This probably won't be the case.
Take Bitcoin or Litecoin for example, they have only ASICs running the networks and it's been fine for the last few years.
The centralization issue only occurs if there is one ASIC manufacturer who refuses to distribute their miners and mines with most of the hashrate like everyone assumed Bitmain did back in 2017 with the whole Segwit mess.
However if there are many manufactures of ASICs and they are properly priced where many end retail users buy them for home use around the world then there is no centralization issue anymore.
Hence the reason why BTC or LTC didn't change their algo in the past as ASICs came in.
unless you have near free power its unprofitable to mine which puts it out of reach for home or small even midsize miners.
The networks are OWNED by bitmain and other colluding asic miners who not only sell the shovels but own the biggest mines, theres no central group in either algo to challenge them like they should by changing algo like xmr did so how could a switch be accomplished lolol?!
what the fuck do u mean an algo switch was not made because its fine?! lol the foxes are in the hen house why would they leavr now?!.
just stop posting man u must think we are blind deaf and dumb stop it
BTC has many different ASIC manufacturers from various parts of the world. You got multiple manufactures in China like Canaan and Bitmain and you got some in Japan and you got Bitfury in USA.
I agree with you some of the other algos like maybe Dash or ZEC are more centralized due to the ASICs but with the millions of ASICs already out there for BTC, they are scattered throughout the entire planet and have a good decentralised hashrate from one another.
The problem is... if BTC keeps dropping then people in certain parts of the world will be forced to turn off their ASICs and then it might be more centralized in one area than another.