Pages:
Author

Topic: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [1st Feb 2016] - page 57. (Read 131506 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
Rating of Avalon: B+ Huh  Shocked  Angry

With Avalon  Batch 1 and 2 they built trust. With Batch 3 and chip sales they cashed out their gained trust!

No refund for trade-ins?-> Scam


In my opinion the rating should be: D-


+1
You guys were just in too deep to keep emotions out of it when considering Avalon. They did nothing wrong on batch 3 or chip orders - that you can get even remotely close to proving. The only outstanding issues is the trade ins.

Not to mention they are only selling in stock hardware and no longer preorders specifically because they fucked up that one time
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
What about Knc?
They're being considered in the next cycle. That will also give them time to respond.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
Rating of Avalon: B+ Huh  Shocked  Angry

With Avalon  Batch 1 and 2 they built trust. With Batch 3 and chip sales they cashed out their gained trust!

No refund for trade-ins?-> Scam


In my opinion the rating should be: D-


+1
You guys were just in too deep to keep emotions out of it when considering Avalon. They did nothing wrong on batch 3 or chip orders - that you can get even remotely close to proving. The only outstanding issues is the trade ins.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
yxt
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 1116
Rating of Avalon: B+ Huh  Shocked  Angry

With Avalon  Batch 1 and 2 they built trust. With Batch 3 and chip sales they cashed out their gained trust!

No refund for trade-ins?-> Scam


In my opinion the rating should be: D-


+1
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Is there proof of VMC having ever issued a refund? if so I must be watching the wrong thread.  I have been waiting since January for my refund and have had no contact other than empty replies and broken promises in both public and private communications.  Please demote; 

I second this. Refunds are not being given despite VMC saying they are.

newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Is there proof of VMC having ever issued a refund? if so I must be watching the wrong thread.  I have been waiting since January for my refund and have had no contact other than empty replies and broken promises in both public and private communications.  Please demote; 
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1142
Ιntergalactic Conciliator
OneStringMiner is an A+ seller not a C+
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Bitmain is sorting it though. I do agree with KNCMiner, but they've done nothing wrong, illegal or unethical in the immediate history. Let me know if you think otherwise though.
If you think that creating one of the largest mines in the Bitcoin world(without telling their customers upfront), causing customers that bought their miners to never break even, is not unethical, we have a different definition of unethical.

We know that though, and have continued to know that for the last 6 months. That's why they're stuck at B+. If your a customer of theirs you're free to refund in full any order. There's nothing anyone can sue them over, so there's nothing they can be penalised for further than they already have been.
I am not thinking of suing or penalising, it's just about the definition of unethical.


Exactly this.
It is the definition of unethical.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
Bitmain is sorting it though. I do agree with KNCMiner, but they've done nothing wrong, illegal or unethical in the immediate history. Let me know if you think otherwise though.
If you think that creating one of the largest mines in the Bitcoin world(without telling their customers upfront), causing customers that bought their miners to never break even, is not unethical, we have a different definition of unethical.

We know that though, and have continued to know that for the last 6 months. That's why they're stuck at B+. If your a customer of theirs you're free to refund in full any order. There's nothing anyone can sue them over, so there's nothing they can be penalised for further than they already have been.
I am not thinking of suing or penalising, it's just about the definition of unethical.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
Bitmain is sorting it though. I do agree with KNCMiner, but they've done nothing wrong, illegal or unethical in the immediate history. Let me know if you think otherwise though.
If you think that creating one of the largest mines in the Bitcoin world(without telling their customers upfront), causing customers that bought their miners to never break even, is not unethical, we have a different definition of unethical.

We know that though, and have continued to know that for the last 6 months. That's why they're stuck at B+. If your a customer of theirs you're free to refund in full any order. There's nothing anyone can sue them over, so there's nothing they can be penalised for further than they already have been.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
Bitmain is sorting it though. I do agree with KNCMiner, but they've done nothing wrong, illegal or unethical in the immediate history. Let me know if you think otherwise though.
If you think that creating one of the largest mines in the Bitcoin world(without telling their customers upfront), causing customers that bought their miners to never break even, is not unethical, we have a different definition of unethical.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
VMC is selling hashfast babyjet boards with a 64% failure rate. I have journalled this in the VMC thread and am updating the front page as more news and comment comes in.
These are the same boards that were supposed to be in the mining farm and the reason they are not up to the 200 TH/s as promised to the shareholders by ken could be reasonably attributed to this.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vmc-unofficial-virtual-mining-corporation-discussion-491609

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
dogie, do you think that bitmain and kncminer should have their grades re-looked at, I know I do.?
Why?
well the S2 has not been perfect in regards to batch 2 shipping time and issues/RMA delays and kncminer has gone to the darkside. I bet there are quiet a few who agree if you were to poll their threads.
Bitmain is sorting it though. I do agree with KNCMiner, but they've done nothing wrong, illegal or unethical in the immediate history. Let me know if you think otherwise though.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
dogie, do you think that bitmain and kncminer should have their grades re-looked at, I know I do.?
Why?
well the S2 has not been perfect in regards to batch 2 shipping time and issues/RMA delays and kncminer has gone to the darkside. I bet there are quiet a few who agree if you were to poll their threads.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
dogie, do you think that bitmain and kncminer should have their grades re-looked at, I know I do.?
Why?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
    ...VMC held at C due to the boards being sold not being originally designed...

    Just a heads-up:
    • There are exactly three delivered boards that have been verified: 2 to Bargraphics, and 1 to a guy in India (who has ordered 5 and received 1, after a long wait).

    Edit:   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206488.msg6328027#msg6328027  

    [/list]
    legendary
    Activity: 2461
    Merit: 1058
    Don't use bitcoin.de if you care about privacy!
    Rating of Avalon: B+ Huh  Shocked  Angry

    With Avalon  Batch 1 and 2 they built trust. With Batch 3 and chip sales they cashed out their gained trust!

    Mining with customer Hardware?-> Big No Go!
    No refund for trade-ins?-> Scam
    Lies about reasons for delays -> BFL style

    In my opinion the rating should be: D-

    Yifu is not part of the team anymore? useless. Everyone at Avalon is/was responsible for their behavior!
    sr. member
    Activity: 336
    Merit: 250
    dogie, do you think that bitmain and kncminer should have their grades re-looked at, I know I do.?
    full member
    Activity: 196
    Merit: 100
    Pages:
    Jump to: