HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 226.

Gandalfs Mentor

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: dropt on January 16, 2014, 01:06:27 PM

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

Following a quick review of the photo, my professional critique of the installation is as follows:

FAIL

1 Side vents are 50% obstructed by mounting brackets on open side.
Comment: Rack, shelving modules should have been employed instead of mounting brackets.

Quote from: dropt on January 16, 2014, 01:06:27 PM

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

2 Side vent between units appears fully obstructed (Rack to Rack)
Comment: Poor design, lack of knowledge and planning.

Look closer, there is an air-gap.

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor

Insufficient, either exhaust from one unit will buck the other, or they'll starve each other.

Quote from: dropt on January 16, 2014, 01:06:27 PM

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

3 Bottom Unit in rack 1 is not readily accessible ~the unit above it must be removed to service the bottom one. (We don't put units on the bottom... (Dirt, physical damage, et cetera) start from top down.
Comment: Poor design, lack of knowledge and planning. Guess there is a first time for everything...

Yes it is. Again, look closer, the lowest unit is raised. You can tell by the shadow under the rear corner.

Quote

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor

Yes my blind protagonist, it is raised; not raised enough to clear the racks lower front floor bracket.

Quote from: dropt on January 16, 2014, 01:06:27 PM

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

4 Rack density does not permit ventilation between units, again amateurish and problematic lending to sever thermal issues down the road that will undoubtedly require considerable configuration. Problem will likely present when they continue to fill the racks if they follow the same installation format.

Guy, you need to get your eyes checked. Only the first rack is secured. The rest are floating.

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor

Really?? Are you certain? I guess so, the first rack is secure; was it from reading what I wrote or looking at the picture genius? You even responded to the next statement where I wrote it, Duh!

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

For what its worth, this photo may be old ~except for the end rack units, the rest are not aligned or properly secured, looks like it may have been taken during the build itself.

Then what is the purpose of your "professional critique" of the installation?

To initiate an educated discussion from qualified individuals on the viability of the installation and further to attempt illumination for those who don't know better or can't comprehend what they read.

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

If you had just finished sending out a bunch of buy-out cheques to customers hoping that they would take the settlement but almost no one is falling for it, what would you do? You need to create fear of loss in people; that if they don't get out and cash those cheques right now there won't be anything left.

Micky25

legendary

Activity: 974

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on January 16, 2014, 02:01:53 PM

Everytime I see...

I can't help but think of...

novello

full member

Activity: 161

Merit: 100

Quote from: cedivad on January 16, 2014, 02:04:35 PM

And you would do that basing on the informations given to you by an internet troller?

Not necessarily, they are quite happy to take information from a wide variety of sources who are in many cases anonymous. Money Laundering is taken very seriously nowadays, if Hashfast are up to no good then it'll come out very quickly. Transfers to offshore accounts from US companies or individuals come under a lot more scrutiny now than a few years ago.

A genuine buyer who reported a 'concern', and the key word here is 'concern', not an accusation, that company funds had been transferred offshore will most certainly be taken seriously.

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SantaMuerte on January 16, 2014, 01:50:31 PM

[...]

Unless you have a way of prooving your relationship with HF, you're just another troll.

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

And you would do that basing on the informations given to you by an internet troller?

novello

full member

Activity: 161

Merit: 100

Quote from: SantaMuerte on January 16, 2014, 01:50:31 PM

Quote from: dhenson on January 08, 2014, 08:39:45 PM

Quote from: SantaMuerte on January 08, 2014, 08:34:41 PM

I work @ HashFast. (Just doing it for the paycheck, hate this fucking piece of shit company)
Ask me anything

Who at hashfast was the troll behind iCEBREAKER?

I would think that

de Castro

How do i know this for sure is a scam, beside working for HF?
Because all the money that´s left is sitting on a account belonging to a bank in a country which first letter is S.
(Not in the states anymore)

If that's indeed the case then perhaps some disgruntled customers in the US might want to contact their local FBI office to express 'concerns' that money laundering is taking place, especially considering the large amount of Bitcoin payments that Hashfast received coupled with large offshore transfers? It's pretty much guaranteed to get attention.........much quicker than the courts.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Everytime I see...

I can't help but think of...

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

Wait, people running bitcoin scams that moves the money in FIAT in a fiscal paradise?

Something must have gone completely wrong along the road.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Quote

How do i know this for sure is a scam, beside working for HF?
Because all the money that´s left is sitting on a account belonging to a bank in a country which first letter is S.
(Not in the states anymore)

Suckburg?

defcon23

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1002

no.. show me the poney ! Cool

SantaMuerte

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: dhenson on January 08, 2014, 08:39:45 PM

Quote from: SantaMuerte on January 08, 2014, 08:34:41 PM

I work @ HashFast. (Just doing it for the paycheck, hate this fucking piece of shit company)
Ask me anything

Who at hashfast was the troll behind iCEBREAKER?

de Castro
https://hashfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/jHJDK4Hl.jpg

How do i know this for sure is a scam, beside working for HF?
Because all the money that´s left is sitting on a account belonging to a bank in a country which first letter is S.
(Not in the states anymore)

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Gandalfs Mentor on January 16, 2014, 11:01:20 AM

Following a quick review of the photo, my professional critique of the installation is as follows:

FAIL

1 Side vents are 50% obstructed by mounting brackets on open side.
Comment: Rack, shelving modules should have been employed instead of mounting brackets.

Already discussed and picked apart. Thanks for coming late to the party *golf clap*.

Quote

2 Side vent between units appears fully obstructed (Rack to Rack)
Comment: Poor design, lack of knowledge and planning.

Look closer, there is an air-gap.

Quote

3 Bottom Unit in rack 1 is not readily accessible ~the unit above it must be removed to service the bottom one. (We don't put units on the bottom... (Dirt, physical damage, et cetera) start from top down.
Comment: Poor design, lack of knowledge and planning. Guess there is a first time for everything...

Yes it is. Again, look closer, the lowest unit is raised. You can tell by the shadow under the rear corner.

Quote

4 Rack density does not permit ventilation between units, again amateurish and problematic lending to sever thermal issues down the road that will undoubtedly require considerable configuration. Problem will likely present when they continue to fill the racks if they follow the same installation format.

Guy, you need to get your eyes checked. Only the first rack is secured. The rest are floating.

Quote

For what its worth, this photo may be old ~except for the end rack units, the rest are not aligned or properly secured, looks like it may have been taken during the build itself.

Then what is the purpose of your "professional critique" of the installation?

You sound a lot like our old friend Bargraphics.

defcon23

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1002

LOL cedivad Cheesy

that's funny to see how josh take position for scamfast...
.. I think story will happen again with monarchs customers ... get ready !! Grin

edit : http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1u4v0o/i_sued_bfl_in_kansas_jurisdiction_and_won/?sort=new

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

The difference between HF and BFL is that someone (that was said to cover a high level position, but it was naturally denied) at BFL already spent some good time in jail so they made sure not to repeat the same mistakes again.

The guy was in prison in Italy, i wonder how is it possible that he negotiated a reduction of the sentence thanks to Italia. Grin

(i'm not sure i remember this correctly, it has been over a year ago).

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-butterfly-labs-ceo-25-million-usd-mail-fraud-a-concise-summary-of-evidence-110805

novello

full member

Activity: 161

Merit: 100

Quote from: Inaba on January 16, 2014, 12:03:56 PM

Quote from: cedivad on January 16, 2014, 11:50:31 AM

Quote from: Inaba on January 16, 2014, 11:47:33 AM

A judge won't decide who's wrong or right in the case you outline, they will just issue a default judgement, which is what happened.

Ok, you are right. Yet to failed to show up, and you should have received some certified mail that notified you of what was gonna happen. Right? So how is it possible that you didn't show up by accident?

Maybe they sued the wrong BFL? Like HF that already has at least 3 different companies?

I'm not sure how I can rephrase it so that it's more clear. We were never notified that there was a case pending against us. The first we learned of it was through the forum. If we had been notified, you can be sure we would have shown up. But enough with derailing Hashfasts' thread, please continue the regularly scheduled posting here. I just wanted to debunk the cut-and-paste Searing keeps posting, which is full of misinformation.

I'll post again next time he does it as well, but otherwise, I have nothing else I care to contribute to this thread at the moment.

Perhaps you might to give the forum some insight as to what you think might have gone wrong at Hashfast and how BFL would deal with a similar situation if it arose in the future?

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

many angry customers
several arbitration proceedings being filled (and several is not the plural of seven, no [what is the plural of a number anyway?])
a few lawsuits
a couple of happy cofounders and a marketing guy
another marketing guy that think to have finally a job that qualifies his qualities

and everyone else shitting bricks.

and not even an update in 15 days, while we were expecting 4.

(HashFast in a few lines)

What can we talk about next? TerraHashes?

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

I believe the regularly scheduled programming is to discuss the definition of "many"

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cedivad on January 16, 2014, 11:50:31 AM

Quote from: Inaba on January 16, 2014, 11:47:33 AM

A judge won't decide who's wrong or right in the case you outline, they will just issue a default judgement, which is what happened.

Ok, you are right. Yet to failed to show up, and you should have received some certified mail that notified you of what was gonna happen. Right? So how is it possible that you didn't show up by accident?

Maybe they sued the wrong BFL? Like HF that already has at least 3 different companies?

I'm not sure how I can rephrase it so that it's more clear. We were never notified that there was a case pending against us. The first we learned of it was through the forum. If we had been notified, you can be sure we would have shown up. But enough with derailing Hashfasts' thread, please continue the regularly scheduled posting here. I just wanted to debunk the cut-and-paste Searing keeps posting, which is full of misinformation.

I'll post again next time he does it as well, but otherwise, I have nothing else I care to contribute to this thread at the moment.

Minor Miner

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1020

Be A Digital Miner

Quote from: cedivad on January 16, 2014, 11:43:53 AM

Hey Josh,
Care to share how is it possible that someone sues you and you don't receive the proper paperwork to be there when a judge will decide if they are wrong or right?

When you register any type of company in the USA, you need to list a registered agent. That person or lawyer is the person that official matters would be sent to. You need to update this every year. Many times people do not realize this or they did not create their business through a law firm and just think this does not matter.

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 226. (Read 880461 times)