Topic: [HAVELOCK] Mintspare (MS) Bitcoin Electronic Trade-in Service - Official Thread - page 2. (Read 35939 times)
November 06, 2014, 06:13:31 AM
I'm actually agreeing with Havelock on this one. I know there have been issues with this asset from the start, valuation, business model etc, etc. However it is probably better just to let Mintspare trade on Havelock and see what happens... Who knows what will happen in a few years if it hangs around - it may make money if bitcoin takes off again and more people want to trade their stuff for coins???
October 26, 2014, 09:29:33 AM
Are you still holding the 100 BTC you have promised not to release to Mr. Puechavy?
According to your financials, you have been operating in the red ever since you have gone public.
How much longer will you be able to afford this?
Will you warn your users before filing for bankruptcy with the Panamanian authorities?
According to your financials, you have been operating in the red ever since you have gone public.
How much longer will you be able to afford this?
Will you warn your users before filing for bankruptcy with the Panamanian authorities?
October 26, 2014, 09:22:43 AM
MS is still operating. They have lowered their expenses. As long as they are providing a service to their customers we don't see any reason why the MS fund should be closed.
Any proof they're still operating?
You're an incredibly shady exchange. No vetting of new IPOs, no recourse for fraud (NEOBEE), and no de-listing of failing businesses (MS).
MS is in constant contact with us by phone the same way you can contact us by phone. We answer all phone calls and concerns. Judge us as an exchange not for companies that are start-ups and have a very high rate of failure in the real world and in the Bitcoin world. Havelock is a crowd funding platform denominated in Bitcoins. We do our best to protect both the companies which list with us and the users of our platform. If you feel that we can do better please feel free to contact us and provide us with your input.
October 26, 2014, 08:50:23 AM
MS is still operating. They have lowered their expenses. As long as they are providing a service to their customers we don't see any reason why the MS fund should be closed.
Any proof they're still operating?
You're an incredibly shady exchange. No vetting of new IPOs, no recourse for fraud (NEOBEE), and no de-listing of failing businesses (MS).
October 25, 2014, 06:52:04 AM
MS is still operating. They have lowered their expenses. As long as they are providing a service to their customers we don't see any reason why the MS fund should be closed.
gg, Havelock, gg
October 25, 2014, 05:31:47 AM
MS is still operating. They have lowered their expenses. As long as they are providing a service to their customers we don't see any reason why the MS fund should be closed.
October 24, 2014, 10:12:39 PM
Havelock Investments, whats the plan for resolution here?
Clearly they are not the least bit concerned about this...(not that it wasn't already obvious.)
October 16, 2014, 03:43:22 PM
Havelock Investments, whats the plan for resolution here?
October 11, 2014, 09:12:48 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2ika6d/psa_mintsparecom_possibly_out_of_business/
"I recently submitted three devices for sale at MintSpare.com and promptly shipped them out via the prepaid USPS labels the site generates. Upon checking the tracking numbers today, all three packages have been "Returned to Sender: Addressee Unknown"."
"I recently submitted three devices for sale at MintSpare.com and promptly shipped them out via the prepaid USPS labels the site generates. Upon checking the tracking numbers today, all three packages have been "Returned to Sender: Addressee Unknown"."
October 10, 2014, 11:54:47 PM
2.5 Mill, you guys are nuts, no sales, no revenue, no proof of concept with BTC.
Just a cash grab,
I'm starting to think you guys (james, and the others are just trying to come up with more ways to grab btc)
If you guys went on Dragons Den with this kind of offer you would be laughed off the stage!
Did anyone see that post on Reddit a week or so back about somebody sending in a couple packages of used electronics to MintSpare that ended up getting marked by USPS and returned to sender for an undeliverable address?
October 10, 2014, 08:38:13 AM
Bump.
Market Cap฿19.8950 ฿12.4334 (~$5014.03)
We are still holding 100 BTC in escrow for MS
Market Cap
Havelock. How broke are you?
September 20, 2014, 05:39:56 PM
We are still holding 100 BTC in escrow for MS
Market Cap ฿19.8950
Havelock. How broke are you?
@Havelock: Any plans of distributing the remaining 100 BTC among MS shareholders?
Edit: Havelock, you should add a few more decimal places. It looks like you're worth 0.0000 BTC
Though you do have something to take pride in: You're worth 3x as much as Mintspare
September 17, 2014, 12:47:09 AM
The silence in this security really is deafening
Nothing since May 12
And June 26
Nothing since May 12
We are still holding 100 BTC in escrow for MS
And June 26
Update is under review by Havelock.
September 08, 2014, 04:45:40 PM
Havelock. How broke are you?
@Havelock: Any plans of distributing the remaining 100 BTC among MS shareholders?
August 20, 2014, 05:17:48 PM
Mintspare's 3 month financial report should be out by the end of the week.
Update is under review by Havelock.
Update still under review? That's a long time for Havelock to sit on some pretty important information . . .
and now another week? is havelock really sitting on material information - for weeks?
someone's just gotta pull the plug on this one . . .
someone's just gotta pull the plug on this one . . .
wow. still nothing from havelock?
The silence in this thread is deafening.
August 02, 2014, 03:39:01 PM
Havelock has big expenses... 165 btc per month
They must need the 100 btc for other purposes
Past month - month and a half has really lowered my trust in havelock. From not responding to questions to letting shitty IPOs run on their site (ie SHAT and the other one that failed to raise more than 5 btc
)
Pretty pathetic if you ask me. They clearly don't read through issuers business plans or give a shit about initial valuations, the idea with investing is that it will grow.. You don't pay for what the price would be after it grows.
The worst is their expense report. How do they have 165 btc in expenses? They need to clearly show their expenses to their shareholders.
They must need the 100 btc for other purposes
Past month - month and a half has really lowered my trust in havelock. From not responding to questions to letting shitty IPOs run on their site (ie SHAT and the other one that failed to raise more than 5 btc
)Pretty pathetic if you ask me. They clearly don't read through issuers business plans or give a shit about initial valuations, the idea with investing is that it will grow.. You don't pay for what the price would be after it grows.
The worst is their expense report. How do they have 165 btc in expenses? They need to clearly show their expenses to their shareholders.
August 01, 2014, 10:53:10 AM
Pretty shitty business on Havelocks part, why would you put money on a exchange that can not even handle a simple problem like this. Even Cryptostocks will delist a asset after 1 month.
July 31, 2014, 02:37:26 PM
wow. still nothing from havelock?
July 29, 2014, 04:59:34 PM
This asset is illiquid a statement from Havelock is required here
Mintspare shares have pretty much froze trading with an empty orderbook can a user make a motion for liquidation?
Mintspare shares have pretty much froze trading with an empty orderbook can a user make a motion for liquidation?
July 29, 2014, 04:56:44 PM
at this point havelock really needs to make a statement. investors have had no credible information, no answers to any questions and the promised reports have never been issued. this is getting really embarrassing to all involved. at this point, one has to assume that the company doesn't exist and Havelock should post an update on what it intends to do with the funds in escrow.
given that Havelock owns shares in this . . . their silence and withholding of material information is very . . . troubling from an ethical point-of-view.
given that Havelock owns shares in this . . . their silence and withholding of material information is very . . . troubling from an ethical point-of-view.
Update is under review by Havelock.
Jump to: