Pages:
Author

Topic: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer - page 5. (Read 14719 times)

copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d
Loan date: May 10, 2019
Amount 0.5 BTC
Date of theft: May 22, 2019
Where is the link to Hhampuz and this address?

I couldn't find anything for the address in question.
32KWpF9URwysaHmyvYJFN9RNJ9iBsCX6rE belongs to Hhampuz

This is the address where Hhampuz receives the payment for managing all of his signature campaigns.

For example, to 32kwpF...6rE is 44e85e0c987db8768d69cc0201d59a639483c0201424ebe215e6a5b1903eae1b which is from bc1qfsra7mfzu3e9kkx53kacfg25e65xu75lgllqrk -- he posted a link to the above txid here, indicating he paid the week three payments for the BitcoinCasino.com signature campaign. This address is part of [6df4a1879c] on walletexplorer. Also from this address is 8c3b182116928314fa0bcb4f4c6a99a967a786e7b505f400ca5ea8f3446faa56 which Hhampuz posted here, and 01ee6575c59e3664a5c012f607f9bfce18cffceba5329362a78a6e0bf603f2c4 which Hhampuz posted here, both for the same signature campaign. Each time, as part of the payments to participants for this campaign, he sends himself 0.0225 BTC.


Looking at other transactions received by 32kwpF...6rE, 5fb428c2a968df5ba884a19a77dd2bf894e1e9e0ce0697f1f0098c9ba3486fa6 was posted here, and 5f16ba490237a1cda6e4c1cef5cbb172ece4c48474568c7705ce8fe2f2c2d00a was posted here, both from bc1qqc69ylxx9d6vm3j35vqxd3t90fxulr7n22rsnt both in the amount of 0.02 BTC and both in the PlayBetr signature campaign threads.


Also to 32kwpF...6rE is a0365aa7d569d24b738e0acffd0a89f5b8f59be14ada229faf59164543f8ca6c which is from 1Nz6yBEKg8Wr8zGVZcxTrQUbGneRXbChij which also sent BTC to Hhampuz via f1de4e80724bb26352d6889aeff249bae2063dc95b7363f2a08943aa7d6732d3 9328e72667cb49a7c9b257dda145d219347efe97a7164f897f0cfcb52fc54780 e128901031405a773ce6f5ad41f8ddb5bd2f88b96b15e631b3561d1a0a0fc86c and abc337ab33cd691c5d2d8d7e91276157a23276be6b8030a349343a367fd8a78a .... none of these transactions were posted by Hhampuz, however they were all either immidiately before or after 24427e9d1e7df01f5e5552a1cc67196d9093e1fda49e7298c019f72e3eb38816 which Hhampuz posted here, 299ffbe32197672df2da3aca53e9c52580d0b248cf36534c1d700bf2b34a9427 posted here, 0d23a199251cee7f60ac539ee5e211e6a73192478f26950de9e0c94da1832a81 posted here, e16b5109391e1f7a38a80010dbef31a85ef6fc6ba0ac6c627fb198615b57714c posted here, 8bdbd1de5c240c793db410dc7b4860d828492bb9b8f8f17b3544507b054aa2d9 posted here, all of the transactions are from 1Nz6yBEKg8Wr8zGVZcxTrQUbGneRXbChij and are posted in the LiveCoin signature campaign. Some of the transactions (not mentioned) immidiately before/after the LiveCoin signature payments were sent to other addresses than 32kwpF...6rE and some of the LiveCoin signature payments have small amounts additionally sent to 32kwpF...6rE that is not accounted for on his spreadsheet.

To even further strengthen the connection to Hhampuz, 572f1c9db10f5a1841165bea13baaa7ba59c85404798eecca9c02ef3f9a5c597 sent BTC to 32kwpF...6rE which was from 3MFaRCvArRg5ELaoUotHpDcVCaHSpDgDGn   which Hhampuz posted here as the payment address for a raffle. As a side note, the BTC in 3MFaRCvArRg5ELaoUotHpDcVCaHSpDgDGn eventually made its way into a Poloniex account that does not belong to Hhampuz, which indicates he was selling a physical coin not belonging to him, but that is off topic here.

The tl;dr is Hhampuz consistently received transactions to 32kwpF...6rE either as part of, or immediately before/after transactions that paid participants of three signature campaigns he is/was running, and received a transaction directly from a raffle he was hosting.


Back to the transaction in which Hhampuz received his 0.5BTC loan, 37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d is from bc1qjw4n3mu5q2hlzjca3ufkhyn7pzmw6pshruzu9f which belongs to DarkStar_. The loan was received on May 10, and 32kwpF...6rE is part of [021ea21872] on WalletExplorer. This wallet, and other addresses I found that had known personal funds of Hhampuz had a zero or near zero balance immidiately after receiving 0.5BTC from DarkStar_.


I had discovered the loan some time ago, and as I told DarkStar_, I did not want to screw him over in exposing the loan before he was repaid, decreasing the chances he would be repaid. It was pointed out to me that DarkStar_ had recently sent trust to Hhampuz for repaying the 0.5BTC loan, and it looks like Hhampuz also gave DarkStar_ positive trust for this loan.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d
Loan date: May 10, 2019
Amount 0.5 BTC
Date of theft: May 22, 2019
Where is the link to Hhampuz and this address?

I couldn't find anything for the address in question.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
It was made in private....

So ... basically everyone of us should blindly believe in what you say ?
Is that it or am I missing something ?

In the end, it's only your words, and they aren't very convincing...
Hhampuz never resorted to stuff like "self-escrow" for all I know.  Roll Eyes

You must've missed his post where he claims to have the txid's and loan date. He just doesn't feel like posting them.
37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d
Loan date: May 10, 2019
Amount 0.5 BTC
Date of theft: May 22, 2019
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
It was made in private....

So ... basically everyone of us should blindly believe in what you say ?
Is that it or am I missing something ?

In the end, it's only your words, and they aren't very convincing...
Hhampuz never resorted to stuff like "self-escrow" for all I know.  Roll Eyes

You must've missed his post where he claims to have the txid's and loan date. He just doesn't feel like posting them.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
It was made in private....

So ... basically everyone of us should blindly believe in what you say ?
Is that it or am I missing something ?

In the end, it's only your words, and they aren't very convincing...
Hhampuz never resorted to stuff like "self-escrow" for all I know.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
If you are so confident that Hhampuz is innocent, why don’t you ask him about the loan? Or are you more concerned about protecting Hhampuz...

No victim, no case.

Case closed.

Bye bye quicksie. Whatever he has done, Bestmixer trusted him with the control of the funds, not you. Stop stirring shit up.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.

I think you accidently forgot to include a link to his loan request.
It was made in private....

So you are basing your statement on the feedback that Darkstar left him, without knowing when the loan took place or without having a txid to prove the funds are connected to ChipMixer?

The feedback was left on 08/06/2019, over two and a half weeks after he allegedly embezzled 0.53 BTC. You aren't supplying any facts here (as usual), just more figments of your imagination.
I do have txids and I know the loan was taken prior to the funds being stolen by Hhampuz.

If you are so confident that Hhampuz is innocent, why don’t you ask him about the loan? Or are you more concerned about protecting Hhampuz...

You are accusing him of stealing funds, not me. Why are you withholding information which could back up your accusation? Post the txids (and how you have obtained them) and loan date please.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.

I think you accidently forgot to include a link to his loan request.
It was made in private....

So you are basing your statement on the feedback that Darkstar left him, without knowing when the loan took place or without having a txid to prove the funds are connected to ChipMixer?

The feedback was left on 08/06/2019, over two and a half weeks after he allegedly embezzled 0.53 BTC. You aren't supplying any facts here (as usual), just more figments of your imagination.
I do have txids and I know the loan was taken prior to the funds being stolen by Hhampuz.

If you are so confident that Hhampuz is innocent, why don’t you ask him about the loan? Or are you more concerned about protecting Hhampuz...
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.

I think you accidently forgot to include a link to his loan request.
It was made in private....

So you are basing your statement on the feedback that Darkstar left him, without knowing when the loan took place or without having a txid to prove the funds are connected to ChipMixer?

The feedback was left on 08/06/2019, over two and a half weeks after he allegedly embezzled 0.53 BTC. You aren't supplying any facts here (as usual), just more figments of your imagination.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.

I think you accidently forgot to include a link to his loan request.
It was made in private....
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.

I think you accidently forgot to include a link to his loan request.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
It appears that Hhampuz took out a loan in the amount of 0.5 btc not long before he what I now believe to be him stealing the btc from BestMixer.

Based on the above, I believe Hhampuz to have used the money from BestMixer to repay his debts.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Someone should tell the aggrieved party to put one of them newfangled flags on Hhampuz. I think that's how it's supposed to work nowadays.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Hmmm, it appears that is precisely what Hhampuz did....

According to you.
Why didn't the rightful owner of funds raise their voice ? Who did Hhampuz steal from ?
No one is claiming whatever, except for you.

You know what ?
The sun is purple. I tell you. Trust me, because I say so.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
QS doesn't have the same definition of the word "embezzlement" as everyone else, this is it, really.
What is your definition of "embezzlement". Please be specific and explain clearly so I can understand...

Quote from: Wikipedia
It is important to make clear that embezzlement is not always a form of theft or an act of stealing, since those definitions specifically deal with taking something that does not belong to the perpetrators. Instead, embezzlement is, more generically, an act of deceitfully secreting assets by one or more persons that have been entrusted with such assets. The persons entrusted with such assets may or may not have an ownership stake in such assets.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embezzlement)

So if I understand you correctly, you are saying that Hhampuz is secretively planning to steal from every campaign he manages, shall they go MIA ?
Hmmm, it appears that is precisely what Hhampuz did....
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Whose funds are missing ?
BestMixers.

How do you know ? Did BestMixer told you ? Where is their scam accusation against Hhampuz ?

QS doesn't have the same definition of the word "embezzlement" as everyone else, this is it, really.
What is your definition of "embezzlement". Please be specific and explain clearly so I can understand...

Quote from: Wikipedia
It is important to make clear that embezzlement is not always a form of theft or an act of stealing, since those definitions specifically deal with taking something that does not belong to the perpetrators. Instead, embezzlement is, more generically, an act of deceitfully secreting assets by one or more persons that have been entrusted with such assets. The persons entrusted with such assets may or may not have an ownership stake in such assets.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embezzlement)

So if I understand you correctly, you are saying that Hhampuz is secretively planning to steal from every campaign he manages, shall they go MIA ?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Whose funds are missing ?
BestMixers.

QS doesn't have the same definition of the word "embezzlement" as everyone else, this is it, really.
What is your definition of "embezzlement". Please be specific and explain clearly so I can understand...
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
BIG Hhampuz covering his ass ........... Hahaha


Wasn't he a big mouth when somebody accused him of promoting illegal casinos?

Now sitting silent and covering his ass?

Hhampuz did do something wrong ?
Can you please point us to the scam accusation thread against him, regarding this matter ?
Whose funds are missing ?

Nah, it's just pointless to fight against wind-mills.
With some people, whatever you say, you'll be wrong all the time.
QS doesn't have the same definition of the word "embezzlement" as everyone else, this is it, really.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
BIG Hhampuz covering his ass ........... Hahaha


Wasn't he a big mouth when somebody accused him of promoting illegal casinos?

Now sitting silent and covering his ass?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I did not say that I wanted others to tag him as a scammer.
I do think he should be tagged

 Roll Eyes

It's also bit strange you'd want keep responding to this thread as it grows for almost two weeks now, even if it is clear that even people who are in no way associated with Hhampuz keep defending him, but leaving a negative rating is too futile an endeavour? 
As stated in my post, a negative rating has not been issued because the trust system is broken and doing so will have zero effect. Also as previously mentioned, Hhampuz is being defended because of tribalism, and unless you have verified those posting have no alts, you have no way of knowing they in fact have no association with Hhampuz.

The facts in the OP speak for themselves.
Pages:
Jump to: