Pages:
Author

Topic: High Performance Bitcoin Mining | Starting from 0.0004 BTC/Ghs | Since 2014 - page 29. (Read 89601 times)

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER
I want to bet with you that neither 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 nor 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L can be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis. How much you want to bet ?

dr1980m tried to purchase 30 Gh by sending 0.003 BTC to 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L from 13RJvPMzxdAyzXQNnLAAimrMQBGseRJRmC.

i make deposit BUT my GH's didn't come..
Please check it
order id: 2793
Here is detail :  http://blockchain.info/tx-index/2e0c0b2cda919cb7270f6ece7dccf4750724391d3bd51a4270130a8e2ad99240

which was later refunded from Cloud Mining Website's payout address (not the address it was sent to) as shown below:

Sorry its my default   Embarrassed

Can i take my deposit ??

0.003BTC has been sent back to your withdrawal address.

https://blockchain.info/tx/4f78abc29316d72d2714fa6b9887f0f42ce97a536257427987976a6bfe1645d6

Feel free to let us know about any further support from our end.

1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L is a deposit address provided to the customer by Cloud Mining Website (who confirmed that by giving them the refund). 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is obviously a shared wallet collecting incoming funds from individual customer addresses and I've already stated the reasons why.  

Anyway, I'd like to hear an official response.

I am editing the bet statement a little bit, so that you can not get advantage of an unknown zone to discard the bet.

I want to bet with you that...

1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.

2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.

How much you want to bet ?
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
I want to bet with you that neither 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 nor 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L can be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis. How much you want to bet ?

dr1980m tried to purchase 30 Gh by sending 0.003 BTC to 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L from 13RJvPMzxdAyzXQNnLAAimrMQBGseRJRmC.

i make deposit BUT my GH's didn't come..
Please check it
order id: 2793
Here is detail :  http://blockchain.info/tx-index/2e0c0b2cda919cb7270f6ece7dccf4750724391d3bd51a4270130a8e2ad99240

which was later refunded from Cloud Mining Website's payout address (not the address it was sent to) as shown below:

Sorry its my default   Embarrassed

Can i take my deposit ??

0.003BTC has been sent back to your withdrawal address.

https://blockchain.info/tx/4f78abc29316d72d2714fa6b9887f0f42ce97a536257427987976a6bfe1645d6

Feel free to let us know about any further support from our end.

1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L is a deposit address provided to the customer by Cloud Mining Website (who confirmed that by giving them the refund). 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is obviously a shared wallet collecting incoming funds from individual customer addresses and I've already stated the reasons why. 

Anyway, I'd like to hear an official response.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER
Proof 2 of your lie :-

1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec > 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3

It never happened !!! There is Tx you can show where coins have moved from 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec to 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 !!! And from when change address is being owned by the receiver ? From my long journey in blockchain, I have always used to know that change address is owned by the sender. Is friedcat writing a new blockchain rule ? The following explanation of yours is a blatant lie and only people who does not understand anything about blockchain will only believe it...

Quote
The latest transaction with 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec shows that it received 0.01091639 BTC and a 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 received 0.3613364 BTC. Given that 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is the customer payment receiving address where the coins where sent to, 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 is a change address which is also belong to Cloud Mining Website.

https://blockchain.info/tx/5edea64bb74c5a60d074c695cde1482a07b73b1301cf1db581bc1a7f3333aeed

^^^This Tx only says that 0.01091639 BTC & 0.3615364 BTC were sent out of 19yrjrpnw7egjpNV1frP6Q7krbwRyTp3S3 & 1673CoXkjFck6s9xnDBYtgNFLzf7scinxN and 0.01091639 BTC & 0.3614364 BTC have reached 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec & 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 respectively. It does not say anything at all about any relationship between 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec & 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3, let alone being any fund sent from former to the later.

Cloud Mining Website is the owner of the sending and the receiving addresses. 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is a Cloud Mining Website shared address and the addresses that send to it are Cloud Mining Website assigned customer addresses. So, any change address or other addresses will belong to Cloud Mining Website too. They're certainly not customers addresses as customers get payments from 1LKW6fiftaQg8UPp32ptdgJW587XXCDk3p (including the refund mentioned earlier).

1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 therefore belongs to Cloud Mining Website.

Further evidence linking to Eobot:

1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM  > 1MPxhNkSzeTNTHSZAibMaS8HS1esmUL1ne (Eobot cloud mining)

I want to bet with you that neither 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 nor 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L can be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis. How much you want to bet ?
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
Proof 2 of your lie :-

1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec > 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3

It never happened !!! There is Tx you can show where coins have moved from 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec to 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 !!! And from when change address is being owned by the receiver ? From my long journey in blockchain, I have always used to know that change address is owned by the sender. Is friedcat writing a new blockchain rule ? The following explanation of yours is a blatant lie and only people who does not understand anything about blockchain will only believe it...

Quote
The latest transaction with 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec shows that it received 0.01091639 BTC and a 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 received 0.3613364 BTC. Given that 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is the customer payment receiving address where the coins where sent to, 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 is a change address which is also belong to Cloud Mining Website.

https://blockchain.info/tx/5edea64bb74c5a60d074c695cde1482a07b73b1301cf1db581bc1a7f3333aeed

^^^This Tx only says that 0.01091639 BTC & 0.3615364 BTC were sent out of 19yrjrpnw7egjpNV1frP6Q7krbwRyTp3S3 & 1673CoXkjFck6s9xnDBYtgNFLzf7scinxN and 0.01091639 BTC & 0.3614364 BTC have reached 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec & 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 respectively. It does not say anything at all about any relationship between 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec & 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3, let alone being any fund sent from former to the later.

Cloud Mining Website is the owner of the sending and the receiving addresses. 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is a Cloud Mining Website shared address and the addresses that send to it are Cloud Mining Website assigned customer addresses. So, any change address or other addresses will belong to Cloud Mining Website too. They're certainly not customers addresses as customers get payments from 1LKW6fiftaQg8UPp32ptdgJW587XXCDk3p (including the refund mentioned earlier).

1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 therefore belongs to Cloud Mining Website.

Further evidence linking to Eobot:

1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM  > 1MPxhNkSzeTNTHSZAibMaS8HS1esmUL1ne (Eobot cloud mining)
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
with the increased minimum withdraw, and this, its starting to look pretty dark ...
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
dr1980m tried to purchase 30 Gh by sending 0.003 BTC to 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L from 13RJvPMzxdAyzXQNnLAAimrMQBGseRJRmC.

i make deposit BUT my GH's didn't come..
Please check it
order id: 2793
Here is detail :  http://blockchain.info/tx-index/2e0c0b2cda919cb7270f6ece7dccf4750724391d3bd51a4270130a8e2ad99240

which was later refunded from Cloud Mining Website's payout address (not the address it was sent to) as shown below:

Sorry its my default   Embarrassed

Can i take my deposit ??

0.003BTC has been sent back to your withdrawal address.

https://blockchain.info/tx/4f78abc29316d72d2714fa6b9887f0f42ce97a536257427987976a6bfe1645d6

Feel free to let us know about any further support from our end.

From 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L, the 0.003 BTC is sent to 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec. The first payment to 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec was on 2014-11-02 08:42:37 (when Cloud Mining Website started) and receives multiple payments of amounts that are integer multiples of 0.001 BTC (Cloud Mining Website's price per Gh/s). Also, out of 242 transactions, only 3 involve coins moving from 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec.

1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is quite clearly a receiving address for "customer" payments which seem to pass through a unique address first.

The first payment out of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec sends 15.349 BTC to 1Ng9UahczApASvLVPCEoJmvnMAHTvXpFPH on 2015-01-11 18:26:36. From 1Ng9UahczApASvLVPCEoJmvnMAHTvXpFPH, 10.0803785 BTC is sent to 1DoXReLhoc4Qw528ejwhYBWE4DyctGJsRv, which sends the coins to 14uiWYG2kwjbm3AorVaB6qK6o2eSETCqRV and with a few other addresses, finally on to 1FsVcdeHbpvUVT3gjeuVR2ZSDnpcsJMsLL.

This give the following chain of transactions:

1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec > 1Ng9UahczApASvLVPCEoJmvnMAHTvXpFPH > 1DoXReLhoc4Qw528ejwhYBWE4DyctGJsRv > 14uiWYG2kwjbm3AorVaB6qK6o2eSETCqRV > 1FsVcdeHbpvUVT3gjeuVR2ZSDnpcsJMsLL

The latest transaction with 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec shows that it received 0.01091639 BTC and a 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 received 0.3613364 BTC. Given that 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec is the customer payment receiving address where the coins where sent to, 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 is a change address which is also belong to Cloud Mining Website. The coins that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 receives are sent on to 1LAAhMSLXhLhvgrmdHancjhUyVE2rbcTuJ, then 11QSYSjTjadhNbKXgBcg4B3k5WjnEMkqP, then 1P9GfsxGavQVgZndXk1EbPyKmYwdtDYufB, to finally reach 1MPxhNkSzeTNTHSZAibMaS8HS1esmUL1ne (Eobot cloud mining)

This give the following chain of transactions:

1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec > 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 > 1LAAhMSLXhLhvgrmdHancjhUyVE2rbcTuJ > 1P9GfsxGavQVgZndXk1EbPyKmYwdtDYufB > 1MPxhNkSzeTNTHSZAibMaS8HS1esmUL1ne (Eobot cloud mining)

So Cloud Mining Website, can you explain why you are sending payments from customers to Eobot cloud mining? Also, why are your customers payments being sent to 1FsVcdeHbpvUVT3gjeuVR2ZSDnpcsJMsLL (an address familiar to recent cloud mining ponzi victims)?

If anyone posts on Cloud Mining Website's forums, ask them to come and explain that.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
I hope that OP will change his mind, idk why people would invest here and not in any other ponzi if they do not at least give weekly (very small) payouts...

Seriously, there are ponzis that will double your money every 100 hours, yet some people still choose cloudmining ponzis that will return ~10% profit in 3-6 months. (assuming it doesn't collapse prior)

Disclaimer: I don't advocate gambling/promoting ponzis. Just go to a casino where the risk/reward ratio is better and you get free drinks.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1205
This is to inform everyone that our minimum amount of withdrawal is now 0.01 BTC. If you have any queation regarding this, feel free to ask in our support forum => http://forum.cloudmining.website

This sucks.

This REALLY sucks.

I hope that OP will change his mind, idk why people would invest here and not in any other ponzi if they do not at least give weekly (very small) payouts...
yvv
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
.
This is to inform everyone that our minimum amount of withdrawal is now 0.01 BTC. If you have any queation regarding this, feel free to ask in our support forum => http://forum.cloudmining.website

what a load ..


so the ppl who only bought like 20 GHS for 0.02,    get 1 payout at 50% roi,     and the second one at 100% roi (if it makes it that far) ?

Ppl who bought like 10Ghs will never get a payout.
yvv
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
.
This is to inform everyone that our minimum amount of withdrawal is now 0.01 BTC. If you have any queation regarding this, feel free to ask in our support forum => http://forum.cloudmining.website

This sucks.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
This is to inform everyone that our minimum amount of withdrawal is now 0.01 BTC. If you have any queation regarding this, feel free to ask in our support forum => http://forum.cloudmining.website

what a load ..


so the ppl who only bought like 20 GHS for 0.02,    get 1 payout at 50% roi,     and the second one at 100% roi (if it makes it that far) ?
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 250
This is to inform everyone that our minimum amount of withdrawal is now 0.01 BTC. If you have any queation regarding this, feel free to ask in our support forum => http://forum.cloudmining.website
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 501

Successfully completed the first week of the campaign. Now we are accepting Jr. Members and above for the upcoming monthly campaign. Join us & earn bitcoins simply by posting... Smiley

Yeppie... I'll be in \ Smiley/
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 250

Successfully completed the first week of the campaign. Now we are accepting Jr. Members and above for the upcoming monthly campaign. Join us & earn bitcoins simply by posting... Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER

I'm sure u r one of the followers of that Puppet gawd, who is desperately trying to proof legitimacy of an ilegal service call HaveLock Investments.

Yeah, you're definitely not SpanishSoldier.  Roll Eyes

Looks like SpanishSoldier kicked you so hard to throw you out of the DefaultTrust that you have not yet been able to cope up with the pain instead of having the consolation +ve trust from Canary Cheesy

I'm sure u r one of the followers of that Puppet gawd, who is desperately trying to proof legitimacy of an ilegal service call HaveLock Investments.

What havelock does is indeed most likely illegal in most countries, and moreover, not a single security trading there is worth buying (maybe BDD at times). So no, Im not promoting it, and unlike you, Im not desperate. Im just calling a scam a scam, and you a piece of shit.

Still u have to come back to this thread again again in the name of awareness campaign. Wink

Instead of all your collaborative effort for almost 3 months now, we are still getting paid every Monday on time and on the contrary, your super legit CEX.io has stopped mining after giving -ve payout for a few week. Tongue
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
I'm sure u r one of the followers of that Puppet gawd, who is desperately trying to proof legitimacy of an ilegal service call HaveLock Investments.

What havelock does is indeed most likely illegal in most countries, and moreover, not a single security trading there is worth buying (maybe BDD at times). So no, Im not promoting it, and unlike you, Im not desperate. Im just calling a scam a scam, and you a piece of shit.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
[ANN] Jan 14th, 2014 - Umisoo, ANTS2, & ANTS3 Hardware Powered Off

Today, at 08:05 GMT, all Hashnest Umisoo, ANTS2, & ANTS3 units were powered off, as their maintenance fee became higher than their payout. This procedure was previously outlined in this post https://forum.bitmain.com/bbs/topics/969. At the moment, we are examining the situation to determine what further action will be taken. We will be doing our best to keep you updated with the latest information. As long as the machines are switched off, there will be no new revenue payments from these machines. Further, we will collect no maintenance fee on the Umisoo, ANTS2, and ANTS3 during this time.

Note: GH/s trading for these units will continue as normal. Users may still buy or sell mining contracts for the Umisoo, ANTS2, and ANTS3 during this time.

Isn't is funny how a major ASIC manufacturer can no longer offer profitable cloud mining yet these "services" that refuse to provide any evidence of legitimacy can.

I'm sure u r one of the followers of that Puppet gawd, who is desperately trying to proof legitimacy of an ilegal service call HaveLock Investments.

Yeah, you're definitely not SpanishSoldier.  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I AM A SCAMMER
What a bullshit answer. For argument's sake, lets assume they actually own any miners; surely they are pointed to a pool. Each miner will get exactly the same revenue per GH as any other miner mining the same pool. Thats what you have a pool for.

Not that it matters, because there is no hardware, this is just an excuse to pay out arbitrary sums to manage the ponzi.

I'm sure u r one of the followers of that Puppet gawd, who is desperately trying to proof legitimacy of an ilegal service call HaveLock Investments. Anyway, if any logical sense is left to u, u'll check the FAQ of CloudMining.website, where it is clearly stated that they dont mine at any specific pool. Definitely, you'll come up with excuses why you dont bother check the FAQ... but I dont bother about that. I just wonder about 2 facts...

i. Non customers are more interested now-a-days in cloud mining services than customers who actually paid and own some hash power.

ii. The OP of this thread is a retard, not to delete any of the BS that is trying to disturb a business that is paying consistently for more almost 3 months. OP must know, that the Puppet gawd deletes any strong counter opinion that gets posted in his moderated HaveLock promotional thread.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
What a bullshit answer. For argument's sake, lets assume they actually own any miners; surely they are pointed to a pool. Each miner will get exactly the same revenue per GH as any other miner mining the same pool. Thats what you have a pool for.

Not that it matters, because there is no hardware, this is just an excuse to pay out arbitrary sums to manage the ponzi.
Pages:
Jump to: