Topic: How do you determine a good ICO project? - page 2. (Read 1381 times)
I am always reading the whitepaper and if you have read over 200 papers, you can recognise a scam project with the first look. A project that aims to collect 100 million USD, is not allowed to have 10 pages text as a whitepaper.
With the current state, itts gettinf harder to connect to those legit projects. Sometime even profesional got tricked on some launched ICOs what more on those beginners level who just keep entering on some flashy ICOs. The competition becoming harder and the approach to use becoming smaller to identify which is which to trust. But I suggest dont invest in ICO phase stage but wait for that projects to get listed to see which one is sincere and not just talks.
Nowadays too many scam project just to cheat money, how u guys determine is it a good project?
it must habe a good idea dn bribg soemthing taht will amke this world a better place for all of us and for our generations 
find great project would be a hard thing. looking for a team that can run the project believed to be true is a thing that is difficult is found in time. most projects have indeed contained this scam and that become obstacles due to the resemblance of a scam and no. a mature analysis will be helpful whether it viewed the full concept on team information and whitepaper available. When this suspicious then leave.
if they were being manage by a reputable bounty manager in this forum like yahoo62278
Btw, I don't trust the ICO rating because the ratings are often inaccurate.
I agree these services are paid service to pump up the project. I have seen several services that offer reviews to different ICO project in exchange for payment. They are no different than paid shills. If you want to determine the legitimacy of the ICO, you should look for the team identity, the legitimacy of their partnership, and the licenses they should have if the project need it. It is kinda need a lot of work but it is better than giving away your money for nothing.
Nowadays too many scam project just to cheat money, how u guys determine is it a good project?
inmmy opinion ti be a good ico project means that it is profitable and that peopel will it lose their money due to it 
Btw, I don't trust the ICO rating because the ratings are often inaccurate.
I agree these services are paid service to pump up the project. I have seen several services that offer reviews to different ICO project in exchange for payment. They are no different than paid shills. If you want to determine the legitimacy of the ICO, you should look for the team identity, the legitimacy of their partnership, and the licenses they should have if the project need it. It is kinda need a lot of work but it is better than giving away your money for nothing.
Good ico project is rare to meet at the moment. I like blockchain 4.0 projects, multiblockchain projects, privacy coins. There are several patterns of sucess ICO. Firstly you should make sure that ICO isn't a scam and then you have to check it for tokenometrics, funds raised and github. Check out VC to participate in tokensale.
Usually, I ask for advice from friends who have experience in ICO. He has good analysis so I believe it. Besides that, I also saw the promotion of the project, if the development team dared to advertise on various websites and media, I think the development team had good vision. Btw, I don't trust the ICO rating because the ratings are often inaccurate.
Many projects are still good and can be successful. I am looking for projects through the ICO ranking website. On the website, you can search for projects that have the most votes. After you get the ICO project, it's better to check it again. You can start checking from the appearance of the website, the development team must be experienced, the project roadmap must be clear and real.
Look, I take a project to analyze, I look at all red flags, other people reviews and make my own research as well. Then I take a decision regarding this ICO.
In any case I check carefully information
In any case I check carefully information
Yeah, really what you say. I am agreed with you. Indeed analysis is the most important factor for us to be successful in choosing ICO. Without doing our own analysis, we will only be overcome by doubts when choosing ICO. I myself always do analysis before I choose ICO. This analysis is very useful for me because in taking part in the ICO, my heart has become steady and sure of success through this ICO. I usually do analysis by drawing four boxes on one large paper. I give the four boxes the names of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. I will write these four boxes about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats faced by ICO after I read this ICO website and whitepaper. With such a description, I can consider whether the ICO is suitable for me to follow or not. That's my simple way to analysis the good ICO.
Look, I take a project to analyze, I look at all red flags, other people reviews and make my own research as well. Then I take a decision regarding this ICO.
In any case I check carefully information
yes i do jot trust any sites as well a speope can write there unchecked infprmation and we will suffer because pf this In any case I check carefully information
Nowadays too many scam project just to cheat money, how u guys determine is it a good project?
good income not a scam what else do we need well and maybe the very idea as well as it is important to be necessary 
Look, I take a project to analyze, I look at all red flags, other people reviews and make my own research as well. Then I take a decision regarding this ICO.
In any case I check carefully information
In any case I check carefully information
a nice project to have the system and the concept of good in it. In addition, the team background anew will also be the base of operations of the ICO project are successful and not. Perhaps for the moment is indeed difficult to find a good ICO many of it just contains a scam. need a good research and selective for the ICO to right.
I agree with your thinking that good ICO has a good system and concept. Team background also needs to be considered. The development team and advisory team also came to my attention when I chose ICO. I myself have the names of the development team and my mainstay advisory team where they already have a good name, good trust, and most of the projects that they work on always succeed. As investors, we must have high accuracy and analytical skills so that we do not go wrong in choosing ICO. Our high flight hours and our experience are very useful because of course we can learn from the mistakes that we made before.
a nice project to have the system and the concept of good in it. In addition, the team background anew will also be the base of operations of the ICO project are successful and not. Perhaps for the moment is indeed difficult to find a good ICO many of it just contains a scam. need a good research and selective for the ICO to right.
I'm starting to work in crypto. When I choose ICO projects I take into consideration those projects that my experienced good friends advise me. So I save time for other activities.
That is a good advice. I would like to try that. I have many friends in the telegram, a close one too. And when they pick a project that they want to invest, succeeded. Maybe I try to ask them next time what project is good to invest. Thanks
I consider the team behind the ICO, experiences and the application of the product to the community. We have many ICOs that have the same application and the competition is too tough for a newcomers that will resulted to failure during the crowd sale.
Nowadays too many scam project just to cheat money, how u guys determine is it a good project?
With the present situation of things, scam projects will efface gradually, because they will not be able to survive in this dip. Investors will be more careful on the project to invest in, because they will not like to waste their money. Even if you as a person find it difficult to recognise a good project, just look out for one you feel ois good, but not too sure of and be on the lookout for the response of the community and how much the project team is able to give precise, concise and intelligent answers to questions being asked.
Jump to: