I believe that the death penalty may reduce the crime rate and create a sense fear in criminals
Yes. This will significantly reduce the level of crime and in the streets will become safer. Now they have nothing to fear and they feel permissiveness.
Topic: How do you feel about the death penalty? - page 23. (Read 26087 times)
Yes. This will significantly reduce the level of crime and in the streets will become safer. Now they have nothing to fear and they feel permissiveness.
Actually i'm not agree with death penalty because not all crimals are guilty...some of them are inocence..although there are advantages when there is a death penalty law because crimes maybe lessen...people are afraid to do crimes..
If there is no exception to the rule, then death penalty is fine. Law makers are always making themselves safe first before they approve a bill.
We can't prevent crimes just because there is death penalty. There are instances where a man goes into trouble unexpectedly, so even if we are aware that there is this bill, if there is no way we can escape the "trouble", even if it is still a "self defense", law makers could always find loop holes, and if your lawyer is not good enough, then you will end up guilty.
What I am saying is, death penalty is good, not just as a deterrent for people to commit crime but it must also be a deterrent for corrupt politicians to prevail.
Actually i'm not agree with death penalty because not all crimals are guilty...some of them are inocence..although there are advantages when there is a death penalty law because crimes maybe lessen...people are afraid to do crimes..
In China the death penalty is given to mostly government officials who have stolen and embezzled state funds. This is the best way to deal with corruption in my opinion and it's good so far. I think murderers as well as those who shed blood and those who through some means makes one to lose their lives deserve the same fate. An eye for an eye.
Yes I strongly agreeBecause it enters into the crime that kills mankind
The law of death for the corruptors is perfect I think
Because it damages the good name of the country.
I'm just shocked by the kind of people that still have bloodthirsty. Can the Lord still beginner examples of how their desires would have liked to have executed people? Can still give examples of medieval methods of execution would be ready at all marasmus. The greatest value of a person is life.
In fact, the society has always been divided about whether the death penalty is needed or not. But when choosing your opinion, you need to take into account how many people of innocent people can be killed by a court verdict or, on the contrary, an overstated measure of punishment.
Well i think that those losses can be acceptable. Because people would be more careful what they do and where they go. That would mean that there would be more rightly judged, than those of wrongly judged. Just an knowing that death penalty exis would bring crime percent down. 
In fact, the society has always been divided about whether the death penalty is needed or not. But when choosing your opinion, you need to take into account how many people of innocent people can be killed by a court verdict or, on the contrary, an overstated measure of punishment.
I believe that the death penalty may reduce the crime rate and create a sense fear in criminals
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
I used to believe that that is true, though there are crimes that will I think warrant the death penalty. Even before, heinous crimes that gets more and more horrible can't be subjected to redemption. It can be argued that death penalty can't resolve these types of crimes but neither can keeping the criminals alive to torment the victim's families. Rarely do we see regret from these demented people who commit these crimes and might as well just put them out for good
A life for a life, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
Death penalty is not so cruel when you experience or see what people do to other people, it may be rape or a murder. It's complicated every murder doesn't deserve death penalty, it depends on how it was done.
I believe the point of contention is right here, you have touched it.
Death penalty by itself should be expression of justice where the Nature itself was violated. Murdering another human being in pre-planned fashion for personal gain is just one such occurence. The line "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" comes from fifth book of Old Testament. Deutronomium.
Point of capital punishment is not therefore prevention (as all human beings are gifted with free will - even to do evil) nor revenge. Its justice where nothing else can absolve the guilty individual of stain and where the only one authorized to forgive him is his very victim.
I fully condone death penalty and I think it should be a must. Keeping alive people who are no good for the society, and waste products on them, is detrimental for the human population because we're growing at far too large numbers and someone needs to put a stop to it.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
Eugenics is practiced by human beings every time they choose partner and every time they choose to either respect or violate natural order. No earthly government has the authority to do that instead of the people (in fact we can see very much the opposite as welfare system promotes procreation of the weakest in body and mind). Otherwise we agree on the fact, that this is justice.
I do not think that you need to destroy a person who has transgressed the law. I think he needs to give a second chance. This is a question for me of each person. This is a matter of the country or humanity as a whole.
A criminal doesn't deserve a second chance, when his victim can't have one. One of my female friends was raped many years back. Her life is completely ruined now. She is suffering from mental illness and is unable to work. Her parents need to be around her, to take care of her needs. On top of that, she got a sexually transmitted disease from the attacker as well. Now tell me, do you really believe that the attacker in this case deserves a second chance? I don't think so.
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
I used to believe that that is true, though there are crimes that will I think warrant the death penalty. Even before, heinous crimes that gets more and more horrible can't be subjected to redemption. It can be argued that death penalty can't resolve these types of crimes but neither can keeping the criminals alive to torment the victim's families. Rarely do we see regret from these demented people who commit these crimes and might as well just put them out for good
A life for a life, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
Death penalty is not so cruel when you experience or see what people do to other people, it may be rape or a murder. It's complicated every murder doesn't deserve death penalty, it depends on how it was done.
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
I used to believe that that is true, though there are crimes that will I think warrant the death penalty. Even before, heinous crimes that gets more and more horrible can't be subjected to redemption. It can be argued that death penalty can't resolve these types of crimes but neither can keeping the criminals alive to torment the victim's families. Rarely do we see regret from these demented people who commit these crimes and might as well just put them out for good
A life for a life, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
Death penalty is not so cruel when you experience or see what people do to other people, it may be rape or a murder. It's complicated every murder doesn't deserve death penalty, it depends on how it was done.
I fully condone death penalty and I think it should be a must. Keeping alive people who are no good for the society, and waste products on them, is detrimental for the human population because we're growing at far too large numbers and someone needs to put a stop to it.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
Yes, such people do not do any good. They can only destroy the planet and all living things on it. They need only to be destroyed.
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
I used to believe that that is true, though there are crimes that will I think warrant the death penalty. Even before, heinous crimes that gets more and more horrible can't be subjected to redemption. It can be argued that death penalty can't resolve these types of crimes but neither can keeping the criminals alive to torment the victim's families. Rarely do we see regret from these demented people who commit these crimes and might as well just put them out for good
A life for a life, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
I fully condone death penalty and I think it should be a must. Keeping alive people who are no good for the society, and waste products on them, is detrimental for the human population because we're growing at far too large numbers and someone needs to put a stop to it.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
Take everyone's life who committed a bigger crime and don't even put a question mark on it. It is the only thing that does justice to the victims and the human specie.
Eugenics is the answer. People need to understand or face extinction.
I believe that the death penalty will reduce or completely destroy the level of crime. All sorts of garbage will be afraid to inflict serious crimes on pain of execution.
It will not completely eradicate crime, but the death penalty will act as a serious deterrent. If there is no death penalty, there will always be a possibility of the criminal getting out of the prison after some time, and then harassing the victim.
I believe that the death penalty will reduce or completely destroy the level of crime. All sorts of garbage will be afraid to inflict serious crimes on pain of execution.
It will not completely eradicate crime, but the death penalty will act as a serious deterrent. If there is no death penalty, there will always be a possibility of the criminal getting out of the prison after some time, and then harassing the victim.
I believe that the death penalty will reduce or completely destroy the level of crime. All sorts of garbage will be afraid to inflict serious crimes on pain of execution.
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
I used to believe that that is true, though there are crimes that will I think warrant the death penalty. Even before, heinous crimes that gets more and more horrible can't be subjected to redemption. It can be argued that death penalty can't resolve these types of crimes but neither can keeping the criminals alive to torment the victim's families. Rarely do we see regret from these demented people who commit these crimes and might as well just put them out for good
I feel sad because for me there are causes worth dying for, but none worth killing for.
Jump to: