Topic: How old is earth - page 10. (Read 12902 times)

Quote from: Jmild1 on July 17, 2016, 10:12:35 AM

If this was true why did god gave us the power of thinking, questioning. God is just energy. The energy that created universe. The energy is in you and every other living and non living being coz every one is the product of earth, and earth of the big bang. So we will question we will research and find out every secret of the universe.

Agreee, we're a product that use to keep our gene using evolution, the one who undergo evolution are the fittest which undergo survival. We fit ourselves in the universe and that shouldn't go the other way around like what theist say intelligent design. We're the one designing ourself to survive with the ever-changing world we live in.

Earth has been here for billions of years. It is comparatively in a young planet. Everything around us is energy. The real god is Energy. It can neither be created nor destroyed. Every living thing is the part of eternal energy. We evolve to cope up with the changing environment.

Billions of years makes the earth a young planet? How long would earth have to be here to make it an old planet?

All our attempts at determining the age of the earth scientifically, are completely inconclusive beyond about 5,000 years ago. To see this, look at the wording the scientists use. They speak in "disclaimers language," so that nobody can come back and say that they lied or even made a mistake.

Cool

PokerFace3

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Jmild1 on July 17, 2016, 10:12:35 AM

If this was true why did god gave us the power of thinking, questioning. God is just energy. The energy that created universe. The energy is in you and every other living and non living being coz every one is the product of earth, and earth of the big bang. So we will question we will research and find out every secret of the universe.

Agreee, we're a product that use to keep our gene using evolution, the one who undergo evolution are the fittest which undergo survival. We fit ourselves in the universe and that shouldn't go the other way around like what theist say intelligent design. We're the one designing ourself to survive with the ever-changing world we live in.

Earth has been here for billions of years. It is comparatively in a young planet. Everything around us is energy. The real god is Energy. It can neither be created nor destroyed. Every living thing is the part of eternal energy. We evolve to cope up with the changing environment.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

If this was true why did god gave us the power of thinking, questioning. God is just energy. The energy that created universe. The energy is in you and every other living and non living being coz every one is the product of earth, and earth of the big bang. So we will question we will research and find out every secret of the universe.

Agreee, we're a product that use to keep our gene using evolution, the one who undergo evolution are the fittest which undergo survival. We fit ourselves in the universe and that shouldn't go the other way around like what theist say intelligent design. We're the one designing ourself to survive with the ever-changing world we live in.

There was no Big Bang. The math that proves evolution impossible also proves intelligence through a Big Bang impossible. In other words, if the BB happened, there would be no intelligence, anywhere.

God is not only energy. He is way beyond energy. Anybody that can cause the complexity in the universe as is seen today (after thousands of years of cause and effect) is way beyond what anybody can dream that energy is. On top of that, we have intelligence, proving that God's intelligence is way larger and greater.

As long as you jokers don't open your minds to what is really going on in science, you are liable to miss the greatest most wonderful thing... God.

Cool

Jmild1

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 11:07:29 PM

If this was true why did god gave us the power of thinking, questioning. God is just energy. The energy that created universe. The energy is in you and every other living and non living being coz every one is the product of earth, and earth of the big bang. So we will question we will research and find out every secret of the universe.

Agreee, we're a product that use to keep our gene using evolution, the one who undergo evolution are the fittest which undergo survival. We fit ourselves in the universe and that shouldn't go the other way around like what theist say intelligent design. We're the one designing ourself to survive with the ever-changing world we live in.

Jimbola3

sr. member

Activity: 382

Merit: 250

If this was true why did god gave us the power of thinking, questioning. God is just energy. The energy that created universe. The energy is in you and every other living and non living being coz every one is the product of earth, and earth of the big bang. So we will question we will research and find out every secret of the universe.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: BADecker on July 15, 2016, 07:11:43 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 03:34:39 PM

Quote from: BADecker on July 15, 2016, 07:11:43 PM

My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow.

Cool

*sign*
The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread.

However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close.
Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon.

Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old!

Bible history is documented eye-witness reports. No theory needed. Eye-witness beats theory, hands down. The earth and universe is less than 7,000 years old.

Cool

*yawn*
Where you've gone so wrong is start from the premise that your interpretation of the Bible is the literal description how the universe began, and then proceed to hammer your square peg into round holes.

Then when it doesn't fit, you blame the hole, not the peg. Almost childlike in behaviour.

Your big mistake is not realizing that God exists, even when the points of proof are shoved right in your face. Since you won't accept God, none of the things you say about Him and the Bible have any value.

Perhaps if you come to understand that God exists, then you can start on the journey to understanding His power, and that if He had wanted, He could have made the universe in all of its vast array, faster than a snap of the fingers. He chose to do it in 6 days so He could savor the beauty of it.

Cool

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 03:34:39 PM

Quote from: virtualx on July 09, 2016, 05:01:58 AM

My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow.

Cool

*sign*
The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread.

However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close.
Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon.

Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old!

Bible history is documented eye-witness reports. No theory needed. Eye-witness beats theory, hands down. The earth and universe is less than 7,000 years old.

Cool

*yawn*
Where you've gone so wrong is start from the premise that your interpretation of the Bible is the literal description how the universe began, and then proceed to hammer your square peg into round holes.

Then when it doesn't fit, you blame the hole, not the peg. Almost childlike in behaviour.

Strongkored

legendary

Activity: 2814

Merit: 1112

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

How old do you think Earth is? Why?

I think human beings can not predict when Earth will survive, even if it was the smartest person in the world. I think if the ground was not persist then it is called Resurrection, and only God knows when the Hour. So do not you bother to calculate how long the earth survive.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: dunfida on July 15, 2016, 07:20:17 PM

No one really knows how old is the earth. Even science had difficulty on it, in religious state it says 6000 years and in scientific says million years which could actually bring question to our minds regarding to this mystery.

Except that the Bible is not vague. It is very clear, as is the history of the people who wrote it down.

Even today, Israel is one of the toughest and shrewdest nations around. And that is after God kicked them out of their position of strength because they failed Him. Think of what they were like when they obeyed God fully.

Cool

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

No one really knows how old is the earth. Even science had difficulty on it, in religious state it says 6000 years and in scientific says million years which could actually bring question to our minds regarding to this mystery.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 03:34:39 PM

My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow.

Cool

*sign*
The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread.

However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close.
Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon.

Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old!

Bible history is documented eye-witness reports. No theory needed. Eye-witness beats theory, hands down. The earth and universe is less than 7,000 years old.

Cool

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 01:08:56 PM

My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow.

Cool

*sign*
The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread.

However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close.
Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon.

Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old!

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: BADecker on July 15, 2016, 12:48:41 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:29:53 PM

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 12:20:11 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 09:41:24 AM

^
If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. Roll Eyes

The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth.

You are confused

You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here.

Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say.

RealityTruth can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself...
I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't.

Cool

If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth.

Your point?

Assuming you are being truthful with your numbers^, all this proves is that there are more propagandists out there than truth tellers.

Cool

*shrug* If you can't even look at the other side of the argument in case there something there that frightens you, what's the point? Undecided

You've made up your mind. You've submitted to misinformation sites like "creation.com", designed purely to mold you like soft candle wax, into the shape they want, their way, by their rules.

That's the foolish path you've chosen, burdened with the consequences it carries.

Good luck with that.

This sounds exactly like you! You are so close to home that you can't seem to say anything that isn't about yourself, right?

When you read what the scientists say about dating the earth and universe, in their papers, they say it right out, that they are essentially guessing.

Further, science theories are not science fact. If they were, they would be called scientific laws. This doesn't mean that they are NOT laws. All it means is that nobody really knows for sure.

My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow.

Cool

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 01:08:25 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:29:53 PM

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 12:20:11 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 09:41:24 AM

^
If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. Roll Eyes

The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth.

You are confused

You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here.

Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say.

RealityTruth can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself...
I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't.

Cool

If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth.

Your point?

Young Earth: 14 500 000 results, not 50. Old Earth: 42 800 000 results, not 100.

= You are wrong.

*sign*
I dispair sometimes, I really do.

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016

Quote from: BADecker on July 15, 2016, 12:48:41 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:29:53 PM

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 12:20:11 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 09:41:24 AM

^
If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. Roll Eyes

The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth.

You are confused

You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here.

Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say.

RealityTruth can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself...
I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't.

Cool

If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth.

Your point?

Assuming you are being truthful with your numbers^, all this proves is that there are more propagandists out there than truth tellers.

Cool

*shrug* If you can't even look at the other side of the argument in case there something there that frightens you, what's the point? Undecided

You've made up your mind. You've submitted to misinformation sites like "creation.com", designed purely to mold you like soft candle wax, into the shape they want, their way, by their rules.

That's the foolish path you've chosen, burdened with the consequences it carries.

Good luck with that.

RealityTruth

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

narrowpathnetwork.com

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:29:53 PM

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 12:20:11 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 09:41:24 AM

^
If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. Roll Eyes

The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth.

You are confused

You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here.

Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say.

RealityTruth can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself...
I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't.

Cool

If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth.

Your point?

Young Earth: 14 500 000 results, not 50. Old Earth: 42 800 000 results, not 100.

= You are wrong.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:42:34 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 12:29:53 PM

Quote from: RealityTruth on July 15, 2016, 12:20:11 PM

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on July 15, 2016, 09:41:24 AM

^
If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. Roll Eyes

The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth.

You are confused

You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here.

Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say.

RealityTruth can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself...
I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't.

Cool

If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth.

Your point?

Assuming you are being truthful with your numbers^, all this proves is that there are more propagandists out there than truth tellers.

Cool

Buffer Overflow

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1016