Positions in the left column does not correspond to the those in the right column. See below.
https://imgur.com/gallery/fqWXO2X
Topic: How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? - page 15. (Read 30339 times)
Great feature, but there's something wrong with the list.
Positions in the left column does not correspond to the those in the right column. See below.
https://imgur.com/gallery/fqWXO2X
Positions in the left column does not correspond to the those in the right column. See below.
https://imgur.com/gallery/fqWXO2X
I have remember probably I had mail you about something similar. I was suggest for a list of most active user. Anyway you made more than I expect.
Great job. Easily can find any user information.
Great job. Easily can find any user information.
Yay I beat Jet Cash! (actually didn't expect my name to be on that list though)...
This is quite interesting to see how all of the staff are near the top but aren't all there (and cyrus also isn't taking the number 2 slot as I'd expect).
I'm guessing this is due to both the activity and merit parts. And also, you're more likely to gain trust if you're here for a longer amount of time.
In person, if someone sees you often enough and gets to know you then you start to be able to trust them and it's similar with the online world. If you see someone continuously here and posting well then you'll begin to trust them also (I think) - especially with individual interactions with people.
@Vod if this list gets reupdated continuously, it'll be interesting to see how much it'll change in the coming months - maybe we could get a monthly snapshot on an archive site as a comparison?
This is quite interesting to see how all of the staff are near the top but aren't all there (and cyrus also isn't taking the number 2 slot as I'd expect).
Interestingly at least 725 members that are most "recognized" are Legendary members.
I'm guessing this is due to both the activity and merit parts. And also, you're more likely to gain trust if you're here for a longer amount of time.
In person, if someone sees you often enough and gets to know you then you start to be able to trust them and it's similar with the online world. If you see someone continuously here and posting well then you'll begin to trust them also (I think) - especially with individual interactions with people.
@Vod if this list gets reupdated continuously, it'll be interesting to see how much it'll change in the coming months - maybe we could get a monthly snapshot on an archive site as a comparison?
It's amazing how provincial I've become, even on the internet. Hell, even on a single website!
Yeah, that`s what precisely came to my mind at the first look. I used to spend all my time in the tech discussions boards, and now I´m engaging with the forum and actually caring for it. The people differ a lot from board to board!! It`s like moving from one village to another!!
I do love Vod`s work. Awesome, man, thanks. Also, it is interesting to see how many accounts are "sleeping" right now. As said, probably is due to the bad state of the forum, but I prefer to think that, somehow, they are spreading the "Bitcoin word" just in another side
Thanks, Vod. I`ve come to understand how my social life works in here, and also it looks like a pretty awesome tool for forum investigations too.
Idk if this is an issue or not, I don't see a lot of names,after doing Ctrl+F,like say hilariousetc or HCP and the highest rank I see is 921 
?
Interestingly at least 725 members that are most "recognized" are Legendary members.
Vod, the new site looks pretty cool and is user friendly. Nice job.
? Interestingly at least 725 members that are most "recognized" are Legendary members.
Vod, the new site looks pretty cool and is user friendly. Nice job.
There are quite a few names in the top 100 that I recognize but don't see posting much anymore. This doesn't surprise me, given how bad the forum has become, and they're not exactly sig campaigners who are earning money here. Some of the names I don't recognize at all and I'm assuming they made a name for themselves early on and haven't been active, or they post in sections I don't visit. There are a lot of people in the collectibles and mining sections that I'm not familiar with. It's amazing how provincial I've become, even on the internet. Hell, even on a single website!
Nice compilation, Vod.
Nice compilation, Vod.
I am faceless. No one can recognize me like a fly on the wall.
Interesting to see the first non legendary at 132. Again with activity being a factor it's no surprise. I didn't recognize most of the names but the ones that stood out were escrows, campaign managers, and very active sellers.
Pretty neat metric to look at. First time I checked out your site. Nice to get a different style topic rolling in meta
Editted
Interesting to see the first non legendary at 132. Again with activity being a factor it's no surprise. I didn't recognize most of the names but the ones that stood out were escrows, campaign managers, and very active sellers.
Pretty neat metric to look at. First time I checked out your site. Nice to get a different style topic rolling in meta
Editted
I recognize the first 17 names. #18 posts on Mining/Hardware, and indeed, I don't go there.
Around Rank 100, I still recognize most of the names.
From (about) Rank 400 downwards, I recognize less than half the names.
I'd say the fastest way up this list is gaining trust, high Activity is only for people who have been here longest.
For consideration:
If you're counting the initial (airdropped) Merit, which was based on Activity, aren't you double counting Activity?
Around Rank 100, I still recognize most of the names.
From (about) Rank 400 downwards, I recognize less than half the names.
I'd say the fastest way up this list is gaining trust, high Activity is only for people who have been here longest.
For consideration:
If you're counting the initial (airdropped) Merit, which was based on Activity, aren't you double counting Activity?
(OMG - this is not a post about merit! This is a post about Activity and Trust as well)
I believe the three main pillars of a bitcointalk profile are Merit, Activity and Trust (MAT).
Since I already rank everyone based on those attributes, I thought I would make a new attribute and call it "Recognition".
Everyone is scored 1-1000 for each pillar. If you are not ranked you are scored 1000. The totals are added up, and divided by three.
The result, a number from 1 to 1000 (lower is better), is your average ranking in this community - according to these three pillars anyway. Personally, I was quite stunned at the results. :/
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostrecognized
I believe the three main pillars of a bitcointalk profile are Merit, Activity and Trust (MAT).
Since I already rank everyone based on those attributes, I thought I would make a new attribute and call it "Recognition".
Everyone is scored 1-1000 for each pillar. If you are not ranked you are scored 1000. The totals are added up, and divided by three.
The result, a number from 1 to 1000 (lower is better), is your average ranking in this community - according to these three pillars anyway. Personally, I was quite stunned at the results. :/
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostrecognized
Jump to: