Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 58. (Read 10167 times)
You should consider all of the things that you have mentioned. A project's concept is important and will determine the direction of its sales. If it is unlike the rest of what is offered here in the virtual platform and that the project is capable of gathering a lot of potential buyers and investors then you can conclude that it is a good ICO but this particular factor isnt enough to determine if the ICO will successfully reach its quota of sales. You should consider how the team advertises the introduced project and how active they are in doing so because truth be told this particular strategy really helps a lot in selling the project's tokens. Last but not the least, the token allocation and supply should not be too high nor too low
The coinschedule and other websites for ICO commonly have had their rank or rate of each project or ICO. However, it cannot be the only determination to decide that this project is good or not scam.
here, we must analyze some elements:
- team
- token allocation and supply
- wallet
- concept
- whitepaper
here, we must analyze some elements:
- team
- token allocation and supply
- wallet
- concept
- whitepaper
First of all, we can not forget that the word "team product market" applies to investing through ICO in the same way as more traditional forms of investment. We will analyze more quickly.
The team - the people conducting the project - is critical to its success. Developing the main project should be clearly defined, have relevant education and experience. It is important for the investor to understand: is he convinced that this time will lead to success, and the objective factors that support his belief?
Products - more detailed information on how and how to create, available to investors, the better. ICO should serve explanations about the proposed solution, the caution of its implementation. Code that has been written by a team or equipped with a working prototype (testnet) makes it possible to learn a more complete solution. Investors, on the basis of all available information, need to make answers to two very important questions:
1) what is the expected solution better than the existing one?
2) is this worth it?
The team - the people conducting the project - is critical to its success. Developing the main project should be clearly defined, have relevant education and experience. It is important for the investor to understand: is he convinced that this time will lead to success, and the objective factors that support his belief?
Products - more detailed information on how and how to create, available to investors, the better. ICO should serve explanations about the proposed solution, the caution of its implementation. Code that has been written by a team or equipped with a working prototype (testnet) makes it possible to learn a more complete solution. Investors, on the basis of all available information, need to make answers to two very important questions:
1) what is the expected solution better than the existing one?
2) is this worth it?
You must consider their primary goals and visions they have set! One good ICO I can recommend is DCC.
DCC will have a user account system and each user will have their own Decentralized Credit Chain ID, also called as DCCID. Each user in the system will have direct access to their own personal data instead of having a credit agency hold this information. User will then have an ease to access their own information anytime and anywhere since their data will be stored and encrypted in the cloud. Credit Information and transactions will be protected because it is a Blockchain-based framework. Actions of the users will be transparent and can be easily traced on the Blockchain. This will definitely stop the scheming among the big groups and this is what DCC wanted to stop.
Already made a thorough research about them and I find their concept very promising.
If you want to learn more about DCC, you can visit their website at http://dcc.finance/ or follow them on Twitter at https://twitter.com/DccOfficial2018
DCC will have a user account system and each user will have their own Decentralized Credit Chain ID, also called as DCCID. Each user in the system will have direct access to their own personal data instead of having a credit agency hold this information. User will then have an ease to access their own information anytime and anywhere since their data will be stored and encrypted in the cloud. Credit Information and transactions will be protected because it is a Blockchain-based framework. Actions of the users will be transparent and can be easily traced on the Blockchain. This will definitely stop the scheming among the big groups and this is what DCC wanted to stop.
Already made a thorough research about them and I find their concept very promising.
If you want to learn more about DCC, you can visit their website at http://dcc.finance/ or follow them on Twitter at https://twitter.com/DccOfficial2018
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
The first thing to do is to go to the exchange and this is an important issue, and then look at the number of people in the telegrm community and pay attention to the heat of the token.Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I would say good ICO has to have:
- clearly stated Whitepaper
- detaily elaborated Road map
- pool of advisors
- prospective technology to embrace
- working MVP
- strong experienced team
- covered lagal issues
- clearly stated Whitepaper
- detaily elaborated Road map
- pool of advisors
- prospective technology to embrace
- working MVP
- strong experienced team
- covered lagal issues
Choosing the right ICO project can be extremely time consuming so I recommend Icobench for a quick overreview and the information about projects ratings that can help to make a decision.
Nice ICO can usually be seen from his team who work hard for the sake of running the ICO. a good concept run ICO will be more mature if teams want to work well, it's all for the sake of the progress of an ICO.
Best ICO choose is not a easy task for everyone ,it is very difficult but when you choose any ICO for investment purpose you can check these parameter for good ICO, 1. What Type of project, 2. Vision of the project ,3. Team of the project. 4. What is the hard cap and soft cap etc.
There are several elements to consider before you decide to invest in ICO. For example, the website would be better if the token obtained exceeded the softcap limit, understood the subject matter of whitepapers and the flow of ICO to be run, a team of highly skilled professionals from the team had good experience and reference in bringing ICO, has a large community level, a bear fund supply and a trusted platform. Maybe there are some that I have to say, and there are many more things to add, you can read them from the answers in your thread.
Apart from the point you have highlighted, ICO must have an active community that believe the ideals and the prospect of any ICO! ICO itself will not do any good if there is no community supporting it. You must look for caliber of people behind any ico and it's community.
The team is important. The hard cover of the project is crucial - the less, the better. The ICO infrastructure works great. Popularity and marketing are important.
1. this is an idea of course-how original it is, how XI'an is, how much the idea needs a cap block or a smart contract. 2 is the Command solid or U? is there a ready business? If Startup is built on a student with no experience running serious companies, then draw your own conclusions. 3 for me is a site - if the site has a lot of detail and open to the idea of the project it is a good sign. and if in the first place only the numbers and the snack $ $ $ $ $ $ it is worth thinking about personally, I recommend the prospects of the project is a bounty and there is a landing +$ on my referral program
https://t.me/KeplerTekAirdropBot?start=283094395
https://t.me/KeplerTekAirdropBot?start=283094395
There are many factors on choosing a good ICO. one that is reliable and trust worthy. and especially those who can keep an update to every investor they have. such as this one.
https://medium.com/@dcc.finance2018/weekly-update-march-13-2018-3c4f8fe3ab02
https://medium.com/@dcc.finance2018/weekly-update-march-13-2018-3c4f8fe3ab02
When choosing an ICO, there are some basic things that you need to consider, notwithstanding what any ICO listing site might have said or the evaluation they said they have come out with. The basic things to look into are the tech and the team of the projects, other things are additions
For me personally its very hard to find what good ICO I'm going to join, So what I do is read the white paper, ann thread and checking crowd sale then I asked my friend if that ICO has a potential.
The most important thing that you should not do is trust the sites on the basis of ICO Bench completely. Such projects often give inadequate estimates for money, and after the release of tokens on the stock exchanges, the price falls sharply. Especially the market is not in a simple situation now ...
Choosing ICO first you need to know the total supply secondly if the project has a business behind it token, thirdly check their website for White paper and their activities on social media and the support from it community.
Hope it helps!
Hope it helps!
What to choose a good ICO should study and analyze information about a particular ICO, that is, see what the main idea of the project is and whether it is in demand in the cryptocurrency market, study the technical side of the ICO, the composition of the team, the marketing of the distribution of tokens.
Find now the normal is very difficult, as projects are getting worse every day, but still it's realistic to do. I first go to the rating sites and from there I start to check first what they offer to do, how feasible, then I carefully study the team and then the economy of the token.
super duper thorough research
Jump to: