Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 81. (Read 10149 times)
Yes, you should consider everything you just said like, Team, Roadmap, Product and how it is going to fit in this world, investments, Marketing, Soft Cap, Hard Cap and do they have detailed Whitepaper. If you have a good feeling about them, go for it or ask someone close to you that is familiar with crypto what they think.
Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.
Yes, I also noticed this trend. There are even cases when all coins are bought out on private pre-sale by large investors. This is the current reality of the ICO. Now it's really hard to choose a good project because the ICO number has increased.I don't think that so many ICO is bad for business. Yes it a bit difficult to pick the best ones, but the number of ICO mean that popularity of crypto is growing and this is good.
Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.
Yes, I also noticed this trend. There are even cases when all coins are bought out on private pre-sale by large investors. This is the current reality of the ICO. Now it's really hard to choose a good project because the ICO number has increased. 
Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
You must check 1st the white paper and see their ideas if it got some pottential. Consider also the team behind if you dont see any information or description of the team we pass by. See also the social media or facebook or telgram of the Ico token the more participants the more chance of successful ICO. You can check also the icoratings.com to check their rating and ico review. You view also at youtube theres some people out there that are doing analytical review about the token.
First of all, you have to check the website,whitepaper,roadmap and the project itself.
that's how you choose a good ICO, do not join if you think that ICO is not a good one.
A great method for me is to watch AMA's and read whitepapers or a summarised vision. What you really need to do is to highlight what makes a good ICO - what technology is going to expand and go big in blockchain, and also what partnerships are in place with businesses.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
The website - the person of any project, and ICO - not an exception. Therefore important to begin project assessment with it. Usually are posted on the website: information on the project, a contact information and the offer to buy tokens.Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Description
It is very important to study the official description of the project. In it usually potential investors are told about architecture of the project, the market and risks. Special attention is paid to technical details. Here the project purposes have to be designated, the business plan and also accurately is provided and financing stages are it is clear specified. The purposes have to be logical and achievable. If the official description contains examples of a code or the reference to storage of data, is a good sign. The more technical details, the better.
If the idea is formulated vaguely, or authors abuse terminology to disguise a lack of sense of the message, is a bad omen.
Team
The good team is not less than 50% of success of the project. Therefore it is important that on the website there was information on participants of team, with the detailed description of their experience and a contact information. The project will look it more convincing if some of its participants already have behind shoulders other successful projects in the field of technology a blockchain.
Road map
Besides told above, the reliable website of ICO has to contain the road map describing financing stages what money, and time frames of implementation of the project will be spent for. It is necessary to pay attention to whether answer planned in the road map to the purpose to general purposes of the project, and how really to reach them in the specified terms.
If authors promise to make something improbable in very short time, it has to guard.
Having finished carrying out such research, it is necessary to estimate whether application in this project of technology a blockchain is justified. If it is not clear how the final product will benefit from use of this technology and as will be able to be ahead due to it of competitors, it is better not to be got involved in such ICO.
In choosing a good ICO you must gather some informations about this ICO where it is base find out what are the offerings it brought to the ads ,then you could also ask your friend about this ICOs , then try to search the manager of this ICOs if he can be trusted and how he manage the projects , how he bring good profits to his members and his advices.It also important to joint this campaign the persons that can be trusted after all this project is vanishing like dust and no more.
If my suggestion we should be able to see the potential and development of ico project in the future. Because if ico is very potential and can be developed in the future. I'm sure this ico will be a success, and don't forget the concept, vision and mission of ico project.
You can consider in the first way look at the selling price. the second read the whitepaper carefully. the third Hard-cap and soff-cap him how ?, Pre-sale schedule and the composition of his team must be known. and most importantly there is no participating because otherwise it is a Scams.
with the numerous icos popping out everywhere, touching every technology there is, it is quite hard to determine the ones that are worth the risk from the others. as for me, one of he best way to do before you decide on which ico to invest in is to research about the ico, know the people behind it and check its technology; if it is realistic and can be used by a lot of people. Moreover, you also have to read its whitepaper so you will also have an idea on their plan.
The best way to choose ICO is make your own market research . But if you haven't enough experience , you can try to trust to some ico rating charts .In most cases they provide users with fair information
That's right. Personal research is a mandatory requirement else one is bound to fail because the ico market is now crowded with vaporwares and scams. Due diligence is required. But It doesn't mean one shouldn't take advantage of resources at disposal though like ico review sites.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
You must check 1st the white paper and see their ideas if it got some pottential. Consider also the team behind if you dont see any information or description of the team we pass by. See also the social media or facebook or telgram of the Ico token the more participants the more chance of successful ICO. You can check also the icoratings.com to check their rating and ico review. You view also at youtube theres some people out there that are doing analytical review about the token.
The best way to choose ICO is make your own market research . But if you haven't enough experience , you can try to trust to some ico rating charts .In most cases they provide users with fair information
I don't really trust ICO review websites and prefer to do my own research. The team is most important and the popularity of the project.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Hi, i think you should pay attention to the team(twitter, linkedin), about token (minting, mining), and what they offer to the clients! Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I will rather suggest you visit ICO review website like icodrops.com to know good ICOs because they parade a lot of good ICOs over there. It is also important to read the whitepaper of any ICO you plan to invest.
i think all of things that you suggest is important to choose a good ICO. however, you can go to forums like bitcointalk.. to read what people think about the ICO
The are some teams in internet who have really good analitics. You pay them some money, save your own time and they give you good information.
When I choose ISO, I look first at the team. All the rest is not so important. A strong team can well implement even a weak project.
look narrowly more attentively that is offered in ICO and as far as the idea is feasible. pay attention to team. not on raspiarenny faces which introduce nothing in the project but only spend our money. and on real workers who will embody this idea.
Jump to: