Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 84. (Read 10149 times)
There is definitely no shortcut to this, you need to spend a lot of efforts in finding the information about the project, team and how they manage their community and etc.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
There are several methods for us to consider that good ico such as if the campaign manager has a green trust is easy to invest in the ico, also the team is active together with the dev. and their realistic goal target for their crowdsales.
Actually all ICO is Good but sometimes project failed (scam) cause some reason, one of them close because it's not hardcap. But you can check how much people review project or participated this project.
Apart from the point you have highlighted, ICO must have an active community that believe the ideals and the prospect of any ICO! ICO itself will not do any good if there is no community supporting it. You must look for caliber of people behind any ico and it's community.
Apparently, there are like hundreds of icos in the market and we can never be sure as to which are worth the risk and can actually deliver. One thing that you should take a look at an ico is its project, is it realistic and if it can be actually used my majority of the population. Another is the team and the member's background and track record; atleast you have an idea on the people behind the project. And lastly, take a look at its whitepaper and other details of the project.
1. The idea. Is it original? Is it possible to implement it?
2. The team. What about their past projects? Were they successful?
3. Soft cap. This is not a very large amount? Is it possible to collect it for such period?
But this is only my opinion.
2. The team. What about their past projects? Were they successful?
3. Soft cap. This is not a very large amount? Is it possible to collect it for such period?
But this is only my opinion.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
here are some tips:-Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Know the people behind them. It is critical to know the nature of the company and the teams behind ICOs.
Go for disruptive concepts.
Understand the target market.
Evaluate the technology.
Nitpick the white paper.
Know what the coins are for.
see what they are promising and if those promises are "doable". If they have what it takes to deliver. The best is when there is a prototype already or a product, something backing up tokens.
A good ICO is not a good choice at the moment. As you said. Technology 、 team 、marketing and so on need to be examined. The key is to find out more about the feasibility of the project. I hope everyone can choose their own project.
A good ICO is not a good choice at the moment. As you said. Technology 、 team 、marketing and so on need to be examined. The key is to find out more about the feasibility of the project. I hope everyone can choose their own project.
Team behind about certain project and support from the community, also one other factor you may want to add is, how many coins are being offered by the ICO; ordinarily, lower numbers of offered coins attracts most people.
Learn as much as possible about the project. Now a lot of scams. Look at the road map and try to find everything about the developers. But in any case, everything depends on luck.
A good ICO usually have this characteristics in my opinion:
1. A high ranking campaign manager with good trust ratings.
2. A thread carefully updated with informations laid out and organized.
3. A set of "real" persons leading the project with promising profile related to their projects.
4. and they always communicate with the people working in their campaign.
though these points are particularly related to bounty campaigns of ICO I believe its chance of success is completely related to its project launch and on how they handle their supporters.
1. A high ranking campaign manager with good trust ratings.
2. A thread carefully updated with informations laid out and organized.
3. A set of "real" persons leading the project with promising profile related to their projects.
4. and they always communicate with the people working in their campaign.
though these points are particularly related to bounty campaigns of ICO I believe its chance of success is completely related to its project launch and on how they handle their supporters.
I think choosing a good ICO requires more of a personal and thorough research on the ICO to get involved in by going through the white paper and also the team managing the project.
what is your chance that ICO is a scam? 
There is definitely no shortcut to this, you need to spend a lot of efforts in finding the information about the project, team and how they manage their community and etc. More importantly, how do you understand the project, and what is your expectation.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I think the choice of a good ico is a very difficult thing, but I generally look at this project has not been able to use the blockchain technology, and the blockchain has no connection, go look at their team information (because Some teams may be fake, just stole picture of other ICO team and change their name), I will find their contact information, join their telegram to observe slowly, watch telegraph group activity is not enough, this is My experience, I hope for your help. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Ico until now. Always choose products. Not a ico MLM will die soon. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
One of the standards is the hot extend of its community, especially the member quantity of the telegram channel.
I have always been in the wrong choice of good ICO, because this is really difficult to choose, especially now more and more projects, like a needle in the haystack.
We need to evaluate everything at once. Although I primarily look at the team, no matter how brilliant the idea was, it is important who will try to implement it. Well, you need to choose infrastructure projects, they always grow faster than the market grows.
From the nearest ICO I plan to participate in ArcBlock.
From the nearest ICO I plan to participate in ArcBlock.
You need to do some research about the ICO you want to join and if know if they have a working product that can be legit, also look for ICO websites like bench, it will also help you alot.!!
Jump to: