Topic: How to Choose better Bounty Projects? - page 16. (Read 22423 times)
Asof i see few of members are disagreeing with some point or other. it is only a different prospective of yours. As in my understanding, these point may have finely placed. these are my behaviour of selecting a better bounty project, which i shared for new hunters or hunters who have failed in bounty earning. thus, you can prove a sound reason so that, bounty community can get a nice output.
It is good advice but also can not serve as a guarantee of the fact that the bounty will be great in the results. Choose a pretty famous manager bounty is safe to do this step and a good start off on should be too long analyzing. see the money collected for the ICO I think are much into priorities to determine whether there are a real and not investors.
What one observe is the number of participants in the project.if they are good one then project is good. Other things which you have to observe is the bounty manager. A reputed and experienced bounty manager have already check the risk factor the product offered and also assure that coin is going to be listed
Most important: TRUSTED BOUNTY MANAGER:- now-a-days, bounty managers are biggest player to fulfill the community management role. in the tough compition choosing the trusted bounty manager is a good option to fast bounty hunting.
Choosing ICO bounty program is not exact science. It requires due diligence and judgement calls most of the time. Investing some time for researching and comparing different programs based on the outlined factors will give you the upper hand and help you stay ahead in the ICO bounty hunting game.
So choosing the bounty manager is so much important things before other things in the bounty campaign.
I was practicing number 1,2 and 4 i think your point are good, and there is something i want to share also from youtuber review also good as reference for joining bounty.
The last point I strongly agree with is "TRUSTED BOUNTY MANAGER" Because they will definitely check the ico project they will manage, they risk their reputation. Although there were indeed some cases it turned out that the manager was suspected of participating in the scam project
Total rubbish for the most part. The main and obvious choice would certainly be that it is already listen on or definitely going to be listed on an exchange. What good are tokens/coins if you cannot even sell them?
I see a lot of under the radar projects with very few participants because people look for all the flashy ANN's even though half of them are actually scams and will never ever be sold anywhere and basically are just decorations for your wallet.
If a coin is able to be sold already than you can't go wrong.
I see a lot of under the radar projects with very few participants because people look for all the flashy ANN's even though half of them are actually scams and will never ever be sold anywhere and basically are just decorations for your wallet.
If a coin is able to be sold already than you can't go wrong.
Do your research before you step in to one. Get information about the campaighs before you go for it.
Who is behind it? Have they done it before? Do they have a good story? Is everything look professionaly etc.
And if something looks to good to be true, it probably is!
P.S. Extra tip - watch if there are legendary and hero members who go for it, if they are it could be a sign.
Who is behind it? Have they done it before? Do they have a good story? Is everything look professionaly etc.
And if something looks to good to be true, it probably is!
P.S. Extra tip - watch if there are legendary and hero members who go for it, if they are it could be a sign.
it looks like you have the same view when you want to choose ico, especially in point number two, which is to see the number or the least number of participants participating. if there are many, the chances are that the ico is good, if it's a little, it's likely not good because, judging by the number of participants, the ico can be considered good or not.
Do review about the project, and check the team if it's good, don't rush be wise and smart by choosing bounty projects.
In my experience, I've been involved in a lot of bounty ICO projects. The most important factor in finding a potential bounty is that it is based on the whitepaper, the developers of the project, as well as the goal of that project in the next 5 years. Also, keep up to date on that ongoing social media channel of this project.
Choosing the best project can very difficult in this moment because of the cirrent state of crypto. This is so because, most projects end up being scam. Choosing the best bounty project comes with doing an intensive research about which ever project you think looks promising. Again, you can also choose from good bounty managers who always run legit projects.
Its really important to start from the bounty manager, choose the bounty manager that already got a good reputation and experience, they can help you if you got a problem, and then read the whitepaper and the roadmap, see where do the developers aim after and before listed in exchanges, nowadays its very hard to search a quality project, some are scam, some project doesn't got any value, so its hard now to make profit from bounty
I think bounty managers these days contribute to so many downs in the campaigns too many inactive members and they still allocate stakes for one week work out of eight. If the hunter is lazy then remove him and make allocation more streamlined to those hardworkers
Just to add.... The success of a project and in effect its bounty lies in the product offered, the team, community as well as realised funds. This can always guide your choices when selecting a bounty to participate in. Always ensure the project is a solid one with a chance of adoption, also consider their funding and team. If they have realised a good share of their funding, then its good to go. Also, check to see the legitimacy of the team involved and how credible they are. This and also a good community backing means there is a greater chance of success.
Choosing the right bounty project can be such a daunting task, especially for those who aren't tech savvy. I mean most of the whitepapers from these ICOs are usually tech based, so for a non-tech savvy person, you can't just rely mostly on an appealing WP to join a bounty. For such people, a combination of all other indices is vital to making an informed decision.
This is so helpful for us to know the better and we think the legit bounty because we are know that many of bounty was scam but because of this idea on how to find and how to determined the legit and not scam bounty but the number 2 idea I am not agree with this because number of participants was not indicating to make the campaign better because even you few participants but all active and following rules they can promote that project.
I don't think number of participant will make a bounty campaign become better . As I know there are so many bounty campaigns with small amount of participant but they were very great. I think the best way to check quality of bounty campaign is check ICO project behind it and their dev team.
. As I know there are so many bounty campaigns with small amount of participant but they were very great. I think the best way to check quality of bounty campaign is check ICO project behind it and their dev team. Jump to: