Getting about 1,300 hash on 1070 Ti. Is this normal or low?
Powerlimit 78% (140w average draw)
Clock +200
Memory +700
Topic: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! - page 16. (Read 13375 times)
February 19, 2018, 02:30:58 PM
February 19, 2018, 02:23:09 PM
I dunno what it was but I had some cards that were just really under performing, this miner has improved even the ones that were under performers.. I saw them in the low 1600's and this brought them to upper 1700's.. Not sure why the large disparity, since some of my cards hit 1900+ mining at the same time but I guess I just have a bad card.
February 19, 2018, 01:50:58 PM
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software
Actually I can and you know why? Because I'm very powerfull - look here
can you explain this picture, why i see fees going to somewhere ?
i fix the diff to 2048 but here i can see diff 256
https://imgur.com/a/FCw2I
February 19, 2018, 01:34:47 PM
I was using Palgin's original HSR Miner for weeks.. It was a pretty good improvement over Klaust CCMiner for neoscrypt. When I was using one 1080 ti card I was getting around 1815kh/s. When I expanded my rig to 8 cards, the hashrate of the combined cards was closer to 1650kh/s. Still better than Klaust CCminer by about 5%. I guess because of multiple cards the efficiency went down.
Then I tried Just A Miner's fork with high intensity, same high OC settings I've always used (90tdp, +120core +600mem)... Combined hashrate for 8 1080 ti cards back up to 14.8mh/s, that gives an individual rate of 1850kh/s. I'm really impressed, and I want to thank you..
Then I tried Just A Miner's fork with high intensity, same high OC settings I've always used (90tdp, +120core +600mem)... Combined hashrate for 8 1080 ti cards back up to 14.8mh/s, that gives an individual rate of 1850kh/s. I'm really impressed, and I want to thank you..
February 19, 2018, 09:10:34 AM
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.
Try to use normal priority version, reduce overclock. Pool can't show correct speed of miner - it's always some kind of estimation, because miners doesn't report hashrate to pool, it just send result of solved work - shares. Pool then try to calculate speed of miner by number of shares it submited during some time period.
Now i get Share Rejected, Low difficulty share
is there a setting where i can adjust the minimum difficulty ?
February 19, 2018, 02:03:56 AM
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software
Actually I can and you know why? Because I'm very powerfull - look here
February 19, 2018, 02:00:29 AM
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.
Try to use normal priority version, reduce overclock. Pool can't show correct speed of miner - it's always some kind of estimation, because miners doesn't report hashrate to pool, it just send result of solved work - shares. Pool then try to calculate speed of miner by number of shares it submited during some time period.
February 19, 2018, 01:54:08 AM
The new version you posted is being detected as a virus with both Chrome and Edge. The previous one was not.
Normal priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78/detection
High priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8/detection
These days most antiviruses mark almost any miner as at least suspicious, nothing you can do about it. Take any miner - original hsrminer, claymore dual eth miner, etc - all have some av detections.
February 19, 2018, 01:47:52 AM
good job you did but sorry not safe to download your fork.
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware
Why did you post link to some file that is not last version of my miner? 13.6 megabytes file size instead of 8 mb and SHA256 hash is different.
Take a look at 1st post of this topic:
Downloads:
High process priority version (more hashrate): https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork/raw/master/hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork_hp.zip
Checksum for hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork_hp.exe:
SHA256: d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8
Normal process priority version: https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork/raw/master/hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.zip
Checksum for hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.exe:
SHA256: dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78
Do you see valid control sums (SHA256 hash) in greens for each file? Now look at red numbers in your url, it's SHA256 hash of some file you're trying to present as my miner:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
Does red and any of green numbers match? No.
Now let's see virustotal detection for last version of my miner:
Normal priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78/detection
High priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8/detection
February 18, 2018, 09:41:33 PM
Good news and bad news...
Somewhat recent excavator build benches 10% more on 1080/1080ti. I'm getting 2.2MH/s vs 2.02MH/s all things the same.
Somewhat recent excavator build benches 10% more on 1080/1080ti. I'm getting 2.2MH/s vs 2.02MH/s all things the same.
Can I see the settings of your 1080ti and miner?
February 18, 2018, 07:30:15 PM
good job you did but sorry not safe to download your fork.
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware
can you just keep it open without encrypt
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware
can you just keep it open without encrypt
February 18, 2018, 05:38:53 PM
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.
February 18, 2018, 01:20:39 PM
The new version you posted is being detected as a virus with both Chrome and Edge. The previous one was not.
February 18, 2018, 09:05:29 AM
It is working now i get something like 775-785 thanks!
February 18, 2018, 07:04:43 AM
Quote
It's because TitanXP is not supported by original hsrminer for some reason. I will try to fix it with next release.
I'd appreciate that.
Also, as others have indicated previously, I'd be happy to make a percentage donation if you can work out an algorithm.
Thanks
February 18, 2018, 04:57:06 AM
What are the speeds for the gtx 1060 3gb?
with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735
with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735
Users report different results, check 1, 2, 3.
Hi,
I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:
I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.
Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?
thanks
I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:
I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.
Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?
thanks
It's because TitanXP is not supported by original hsrminer for some reason. I will try to fix it with next release.
February 18, 2018, 03:04:44 AM
Hi,
I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:
I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.
Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?
thanks
I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:
C:\NemosMiner-v2.4.2\Bin\NeoScrypt-Palgin>hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17012 -u Zackdaystar.miner1 -p x
888888ba oo dP oo
88 `8b 88
88 88 dP .dP dP .d888b88 dP .d8888b.
88 88 88 d8' 88 88' `88 88 88' `88 888888b 8P dP
88 88 88 .88' 88 88. .88 88 88. .88 88 .d8888b. 88d888b. 88 d8
dP dP 8888P' dP `88888P8 dP `88888P8 888888 88' `88 88' `88 88d88
88 88. .88 88 88 d8
dP `88888P' dP 8P dP
dP oo
88
88d888b. .d8888b. 88d888b. 88d8b.d8b. dP 88d888b. .d8888b. 88d888b.
88' `88 Y8ooooo. 88' `88 88'`88'`88 88 88' `88 88ooood8 88' `88
88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88. ... 88
dP dP `88888P' dP dP dP dP dP dP dP `88888P' dP
https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork
****************************************************************************************************
NVIDIA hsrminer 1.0.1+ for Neoscrypt forked of palgin by Justaminer. Fork's version: 08.02.2018
****************************************************************************************************
Fork contains 0% devfee, working API and -r option, enjoy! ( run with -h to see all new options! )
****************************************************************************************************
INFO : [07:59:54] : POOL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17012
INFO : [07:59:54] : Checking for NVML...
INFO : [07:59:54] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
INFO : [07:59:54] : 1 GPU found/specified, initializing miner...
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share difficulty reset -- 366.309 (0.00559)
INFO : [07:59:54] : New block #2093994 received, new difficulty is 197.711
INFO : [07:59:54] : GPU #0: TITAN Xp, flags: 0, 0, 0
INFO : [07:59:54] : submit_upstream_work stratum_send_line failed
INFO : [07:59:54] : ...retry after 10 seconds
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, low difficulty share of 0.00002879379610524816
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.
Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?
thanks
February 18, 2018, 02:14:07 AM
What are the speeds for the gtx 1060 3gb?
with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735
with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735
February 17, 2018, 02:04:31 PM
I think GeForce1 just wanted to point his miner at your stratum/wallet for a day as a form of donation. Same idea crossed my mind as I was sending btc and had to pay 10% transaction cost...
Btw, fees for btc are quite low last weeks, may be month. I remember it was like 300-400 satoshi per byte like 2-3 month ago. Today I was able to send it for just 15 (only 15 !) satoshi per byte, get 1st confirmation in 5 minutes and 4 confirmations in 20 minutes. I must say it's not bad for good old BTC
February 17, 2018, 01:57:39 PM
Possible Linux version ?
Not of fork, because there is no sources.
Jump to: