Pages:
Author

Topic: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! - page 16. (Read 13383 times)

newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Getting about 1,300 hash on 1070 Ti. Is this normal or low?

Powerlimit 78% (140w average draw)
Clock +200
Memory +700
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
I dunno what it was but I had some cards that were just really under performing, this miner has improved even the ones that were under performers.. I saw them in the low 1600's and this brought them to upper 1700's.. Not sure why the large disparity, since some of my cards hit 1900+ mining at the same time but I guess I just have a bad card.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software

Actually I can and you know why? Because I'm very powerfull - look here   Grin
ok MR macho Cheesy
can you explain this picture, why i see fees going to somewhere ? Smiley
i fix the diff to 2048 but here i can see diff 256
https://imgur.com/a/FCw2I
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
I was using Palgin's original HSR Miner for weeks.. It was a pretty good improvement over Klaust CCMiner for neoscrypt. When I was using one 1080 ti card I was getting around 1815kh/s. When I expanded my rig to 8 cards, the hashrate of the combined cards was closer to 1650kh/s. Still better than Klaust CCminer by about 5%. I guess because of multiple cards the efficiency went down.

Then I tried Just A Miner's fork with high intensity, same high OC settings I've always used (90tdp, +120core +600mem)... Combined hashrate for 8 1080 ti cards back up to 14.8mh/s, that gives an individual rate of 1850kh/s. I'm really impressed, and I want to thank you..
full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.

Try to use normal priority version, reduce overclock. Pool can't show correct speed of miner - it's always some kind of estimation, because miners doesn't report hashrate to pool, it just send result of solved work - shares. Pool then try to calculate speed of miner by number of shares it submited during some time period.

Now i get Share Rejected, Low difficulty share

is there a setting where i can adjust the minimum difficulty ?

jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software

Actually I can and you know why? Because I'm very powerfull - look here   Grin
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.

Try to use normal priority version, reduce overclock. Pool can't show correct speed of miner - it's always some kind of estimation, because miners doesn't report hashrate to pool, it just send result of solved work - shares. Pool then try to calculate speed of miner by number of shares it submited during some time period.
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
The new version you posted is being detected as a virus with both Chrome and Edge.  The previous one was not.

Normal priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78/detection

High priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8/detection

These days most antiviruses mark almost any miner as at least suspicious, nothing you can do about it. Take any miner - original hsrminer, claymore dual eth miner, etc - all have some av detections.
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
good job you did but sorry not safe to download your fork.
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware

Why did you post link to some file that is not last version of my miner? 13.6 megabytes file size instead of 8 mb and SHA256 hash is different.

Take a look at 1st post of this topic:


Downloads:

High process priority version (more hashrate): https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork/raw/master/hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork_hp.zip

Checksum for hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork_hp.exe:
SHA256: d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8


Normal process priority version: https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork/raw/master/hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.zip

Checksum for hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.exe:
SHA256: dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78

Do you see valid control sums (SHA256 hash) in greens for each file? Now look at red numbers in your url, it's SHA256 hash of some file you're trying to present as my miner:

https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection

Does red and any of green numbers match? No.

Now let's see virustotal detection for last version of my miner:

Normal priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/dc0b4ee4dff16847a5fa53d8ad82d1c2a4661b9c67e7fcadea8ebe75b888fd78/detection

High priority version - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/d6bf7149ff189d786f1ee0a5bf28befbd6a1fa12efe02cc27b08dc0de0d268f8/detection


newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Good news and bad news...

Somewhat recent excavator build benches 10% more on 1080/1080ti. I'm getting 2.2MH/s vs 2.02MH/s all things the same.


Can I see the settings of your 1080ti and miner?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
good job you did but sorry not safe to download your fork.
its close code and with binary you can't add and customize the software
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/4992661665e1dfcc8a28d5589484db49ea5f51a20b55d84a233a9cc2fc655e2f/detection
showing trojan and malware
can you just keep it open without encrypt Smiley
full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
Miner shows a higher speed then the pool and getting much more rejected shares. I will do a 24 run and compare it.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
The new version you posted is being detected as a virus with both Chrome and Edge.  The previous one was not.
full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
It is working now i get something like 775-785 thanks!
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Quote

It's because TitanXP is not supported by original hsrminer for some reason. I will try to fix it with next release.

I'd appreciate that.

Also, as others have indicated previously, I'd be happy to make a percentage donation if you can work out an algorithm.

Thanks
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
What are the speeds for the gtx 1060 3gb?

with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735

Users report different results, check 1, 2, 3.

Hi,
I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:

I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.

Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?

thanks


It's because TitanXP is not supported by original hsrminer for some reason. I will try to fix it with next release.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hi,

I'm moving this over from the more general thread on neoscrypt.
I have tried running this from neominer and from the command line thus:


C:\NemosMiner-v2.4.2\Bin\NeoScrypt-Palgin>hsrminer_neoscrypt_fork.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17012 -u Zackdaystar.miner1 -p x

              888888ba           oo       dP oo
              88    `8b                   88
              88     88 dP   .dP dP .d888b88 dP .d8888b.
              88     88 88   d8' 88 88'  `88 88 88'  `88     888888b                   8P   dP
              88     88 88 .88'  88 88.  .88 88 88.  .88     88      .d8888b. 88d888b. 88  d8
              dP     dP 8888P'   dP `88888P8 dP `88888P8     888888  88'  `88 88'  `88 88d88
                                                             88      88.  .88 88       88  d8
                                                             dP      `88888P' dP       8P   dP
  dP                                    oo
  88
  88d888b. .d8888b. 88d888b. 88d8b.d8b. dP 88d888b. .d8888b. 88d888b.
  88'  `88 Y8ooooo. 88'  `88 88'`88'`88 88 88'  `88 88ooood8 88'  `88
  88    88       88 88       88  88  88 88 88    88 88.  ... 88
  dP    dP `88888P' dP       dP  dP  dP dP dP    dP `88888P' dP

                                                             https://github.com/justaminer/hsrm-fork
****************************************************************************************************
 NVIDIA hsrminer 1.0.1+ for Neoscrypt forked of palgin by Justaminer.    Fork's version: 08.02.2018
****************************************************************************************************
 Fork contains 0% devfee, working API and -r option, enjoy! ( run with -h to see all new options! )
****************************************************************************************************

 INFO : [07:59:54] : POOL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17012
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [07:59:54] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [07:59:54] : 1 GPU found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share difficulty reset -- 366.309 (0.00559)
 INFO : [07:59:54] : New block #2093994 received, new difficulty is 197.711
 INFO : [07:59:54] : GPU #0: TITAN Xp, flags: 0, 0, 0
 INFO : [07:59:54] : submit_upstream_work stratum_send_line failed
 INFO : [07:59:54] : ...retry after 10 seconds
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, low difficulty share of 0.00002879379610524816
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share
 INFO : [07:59:54] : Share Rejected, duplicate share


I am getting a lot of rejected shares, same as with non fork version and some accepted shares. And ultimately efficiency drops to around 20%.

Is this something to do with the TitanXP or am i doing something wrong?

thanks

full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
What are the speeds for the gtx 1060 3gb?

with klaust i get like 750/780
but with hsrminer i get 735
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
I think GeForce1 just wanted to point his miner at your stratum/wallet for a day as a form of donation. Same idea crossed my mind as I was sending btc and had to pay 10% transaction cost...

Btw, fees for btc are quite low last weeks, may be month. I remember it was like 300-400 satoshi per byte like 2-3 month ago. Today I was able to send it for just 15 (only 15 !) satoshi per byte, get 1st confirmation in 5 minutes and 4 confirmations in 20 minutes. I must say it's not bad for good old BTC  Grin
jr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 2
Possible Linux version ?


Not of fork, because there is no sources.
Pages:
Jump to: