Pages:
Author

Topic: hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap - page 41. (Read 30791 times)

member
Activity: 144
Merit: 10
so another longer testing shows stable intensity (neoscrypt only):

1070 = 4
1070ti = 4 (5-6 makes illegal memory access, same settings)
1080ti = 6

edited: 1070ti on 5 makes illegal memory access too
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250

Testing it. Is it normal that after the initial GPU speed reports there is only an overall one? Could we still have separate ones for the cards? It does look like that the speed on one of my 1080ti's increased by a bit.


Yes, currently it's working this way, in future I'm planning to add stats request on a button, like in Claymore's Dual Miner.
How about just report it back periodically? Like once every 5 minutes or so? Btw shall I mess around with -i settings? What's the default?

I can make it this way, no problem.

For 1080 (both), 1070 and Titan series it's 17.5 by default.
For 1060 3/6G and 1050Ti it's 16.1 by default.
For 1050 it's 15 by default.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 11

Testing it. Is it normal that after the initial GPU speed reports there is only an overall one? Could we still have separate ones for the cards? It does look like that the speed on one of my 1080ti's increased by a bit.


Yes, currently it's working this way, in future I'm planning to add stats request on a button, like in Claymore's Dual Miner.
How about just report it back periodically? Like once every 5 minutes or so? Btw shall I mess around with -i settings? What's the default?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250

Testing it. Is it normal that after the initial GPU speed reports there is only an overall one? Could we still have separate ones for the cards? It does look like that the speed on one of my 1080ti's increased by a bit.


Yes, currently it's working this way, in future I'm planning to add stats request on a button, like in Claymore's Dual Miner.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 11
UPDATE: Little speedup for 1080's implemented, I ask everyone interested to test it (test version link), added to the first post too.

LINK: TEST_VERSION

Testing it. Is it normal that after the initial GPU speed reports there is only an overall one? Could we still have separate ones for the cards? It does look like that the speed on one of my 1080ti's increased by a bit.

sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
UPDATE: Little speedup for 1080's implemented, I ask everyone interested to test it (test version link), added to the first post too.

LINK: TEST_VERSION
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Hey! I admire your work really. I am trying to use the neoscrypt but I always get this error.

Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.

What do you think is the problem? I have 6 1080 ti.

You are well-appreciated! Thank you.


Hi, try incerasing your pagefile size. Calculation formula is in the first post of this thread:

***ATTENTION***
For rigs with multiple Hi-End graphic cards (5x1080, for example), summary of physical RAM installed plus pagefile size should be more than summary of amounts of allocated memory on each GPU.

Example:
I have 6x1080 rig, on each kernel allocates 6260 Mb memory, so sum of RAM + pagefile should be more than 6260*6 = 37560.

Keep that in mind when launching on multi-GPU systems.

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Hey! I admire your work really. I am trying to use the neoscrypt but I always get this error.

Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.

What do you think is the problem? I have 6 1080 ti.

You are well-appreciated! Thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Cant wait for Linux version to include it in nvOC default miners.
Keep up the good work.

Linux will be avaliable soon, let me finish previous tasks first. API is coming soon too.
jr. member
Activity: 82
Merit: 1
GPU #0:  GTX 1080 Ti, 1989.39 kH/s  Cool
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 140
Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!


Q: Linux support?
A: Planned, I'll provide Linux binaries once I set up developement machine for *nix.



Cant wait for Linux version to include it in nvOC default miners.
Keep up the good work.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.



And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  Roll Eyes

Everyone has good and bad days, it was my bad one, sorry if I abused you. But every medal has 2 sides.

From your side: OK, I've tested it, result sucks, let's post it.

From my side: Oh, new post, wait... This guy is kidding? Fake hashrate, really? He took his time to write this here, but but didn't even tried confiruring. Attack!

So sorry for any inconveniences, in average situation I'd just ignore your post, but not that day.

i have change the paging memory size but still have some crashing after some time

i have two gtx 1060 6g

work fine with ccminer but lower hashrate so try to find why it crash Sad

Have you tried both test and release versions (test can be found on GitHub directly in the same folder, no links in thread) ?

newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Tyт ecть вecьмa явнaя зaвиcимocть oт cлoжнocти нa NeoScrypt. Ecли фикcиpoвaть, тo cкopocть нa paзныx нacтpoйкax cyщecтвeннo oтличaeтcя. Пoэкcпepимeнтиpyйтe. Ha pигe c тpeмя 1070-ми и oднoй 1080Ti экcпepимeнтaльнo пoдoбpaл oптимaльнoe знaчeниe - 512. Bмecтo 5.2 MH/s выдaётcя cтaбильнo 5.4 MH/s. Пoчти 4% pocт...

A вooбщe, нa этoм мaйнepe пapa мoиx 1060-ыx выдaёт пoчти cтoлькo жe, cкoлькo и oднa 1080Ti. Mecтo oптимизaции...
newbie
Activity: 87
Merit: 0
Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy  Grin  Grin

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.

https://i.imgur.com/2D9vUuM.png

And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  Roll Eyes


Wait why are you pulling 251w on a 1070 lol

NeoScrypt is power hungry, i guess. lol

This was tested with 2126MHz Core & 4252MHz Memory clocks at 126% power limit on a MSI 1070 Gaming Z, don't ask me why i get at peak 260 watts. Other algos are far less power hungry, usually with these clocks i'm between 75% and 90% power limit (silicon lottery).
member
Activity: 431
Merit: 10
Quote
Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!
Alex-007, фaйл пoдкaчки yвeличь, в пepвoм пocтe pacпиcaнo.

80000, and dont working !!!!
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0

Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!
Driwer 388.71

 INFO : [01:33:49] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [01:33:49] : 8 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [01:33:50] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining!
 INFO : [01:33:50] : Share difficulty reset -- 256 (0.00391)
 INFO : [01:33:50] : New block #3426 received, new difficulty is 441.081
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.

But it working with cuda 9

[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1511.39 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #4: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1492.73 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #7: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1487.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #1: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1541.18 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #3: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1528.19 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #6: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1518.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #5: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1514.14 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.007), 12.12 MH/s ye

Read the first post in the thread - this question has been asked, and answered, multiple times in the past 48 hours.
full member
Activity: 1124
Merit: 136
Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy  Grin  Grin

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.



And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  Roll Eyes


Wait why are you pulling 251w on a 1070 lol
member
Activity: 431
Merit: 10


Hi, thanks for your interest, but in fact you're not right.

We've started this project specially to get rid of GPL licensed code and possible legal problems, all kernels in hsrminer are my intellectual property, which I have full right not to publish in source code format. You can say style smells like ccminer, but style similarity is not GPL violation, it's the same as, for example, saying that "Daimler AG" is violating "WAG Group" licenses because their cars also have steering wheels and doors. And program clearly says it was "inspired" by ccminer and EWBF's equihash miner.

This project is not related to any kind of "optimisation" as ccminer-palginmod was. If it was so, why we're losing devfee and not releasing new algos for weeks? ccminer-palginmod had many algos "optimised", why not publish them? Hsrminer kernels are homebrew, and it takes me tons of time (really, I get up at 7AM and go to bed at midnight, spending hours in front of screen) to create something faster than existing software offers. Also, palginmod had no movement since 9th of August this year if you look at github.

It's your right to use this software or not, just to close any speculation around GPL and my violation of it, I'm removing all palginmod binaries from Github, just right time to do it.

Thank you again for raising this question and have a nice day!
Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!
Driwer 388.71

 INFO : [01:33:49] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [01:33:49] : 8 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [01:33:50] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining!
 INFO : [01:33:50] : Share difficulty reset -- 256 (0.00391)
 INFO : [01:33:50] : New block #3426 received, new difficulty is 441.081
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.

But it working with cuda 9

[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1511.39 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #4: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1492.73 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #7: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1487.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #1: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1541.18 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #3: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1528.19 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #6: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1518.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #5: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1514.14 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.007), 12.12 MH/s ye
newbie
Activity: 87
Merit: 0
Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy  Grin  Grin

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.

https://i.imgur.com/2D9vUuM.png

And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 431
Merit: 10
1080ti working in cuda 9 better!!!
You miner dont give 1700> only 1300

Pages:
Jump to: