This being clearly the case, how much else of your financial philosophy is based on hoaxes, mis-information, FUD and plain old-fashioned bullshit?
I've ignored Sage long ago.
Just do the same.
You are unlikely to get any form of intelligent two sided debate from him/her.
In my experience he/she will spout unproven/fictional nonsense then when/if someone calls him/her on it, he/she will resort to personal attacks.
Apparently you haven't ignored me 7Priest7...
And since you haven't, at the danger of co-opting this thread, go ahead 7Priest. Quote me in full context where I haven't directly addressed anyone who has "called me on it" with the facts, and instead resorted to "personal attacks".
Make no mistake about it, I'll call out any shill here. And confront them with the facts. Giving them about as much respect as any government paid shill deserves in the process. But never have I, nor would I ever avoid or deflect a confrontation with a "personal attack".
...Nor would I need to. In matters of exposing Federal Reserve & the scam that is the IRS, the truth is squarely on my side.
Lastly, if I'm wrong & the facts prove that to be so, then I celebrate. Shedding falsehood is something to be celebrated. When I'm wrong I'm wrong, & the first to admit it.
It's sad, but in matters of central banking, the Federal Reserve, the IRS scam, everything I have said here is true... I only wish it wasn't.