Topic: IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon (Read 690 times)
In terms of securing your assets with no hassle upon making a transactions since you are only using the account of a certain exchanges that are highly trusted and reliable. But we should also be aware of something that are possible to happen the kind of losing money because of an immediate dump. Like what happened for the ICO a year ago.
Both IEO and ICO will go down as one of the better coin offering that ever existed in crypto scene. ICO is the pioneer of all crowdfunding and will have its place in history book of crypto but it will not be as good as what IEO is doing right now, IEO is much more secured unlike ICO that had been exploited to scam investors.
IEO is also not a secure scheme. you get coins that are already traded on the exchange, but their price can dump so low that it will equal the scam of the project that conducted the ICO
Both IEO and ICO will go down as one of the better coin offering that ever existed in crypto scene. ICO is the pioneer of all crowdfunding and will have its place in history book of crypto but it will not be as good as what IEO is doing right now, IEO is much more secured unlike ICO that had been exploited to scam investors.
for the next few years from my point of view IEO is still feasible to use,
but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
Agree, IEOs only legit if they are on good exchange with strong support and liquidity. Although OP mentioned about DYCO but I don't see a lot of coins implement it, yet.but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
Maybe this year, IEO will still be available on sjavascript:void(0);ome exchanges because the exchanges want to make money from the project still. I think many people are still waiting for the next projects which can give them money. But in the end, if there is a new program that can attract the investor to try, that will replace the old programs, and many people will move to those new programs. It will happen like that, and we can only follow the trend, so we can still make money from the program.
if there is something better than IEO, then I think IEO will also become history like the current ICO which has almost disappeared. however, nowadays people are looking for investments that have a profitable system on both sides. so investors can invest the money they have in developers who are really serious about the projects they will develop.So far, so good, there has not been any problem per se with IEO, except those done on smaller and less trusted or non-trusted exchanges. Since IEO has not failed us, there might not be any replacement soon. Although, new ideas on fundraising might have started coming onboard, but not so popular. Such idea(s) will still wait until IEO becomes faulty.
Maybe this year, IEO will still be available on some exchanges because the exchanges want to make money from the project still. I think many people are still waiting for the next projects which can give them money. But in the end, if there is a new program that can attract the investor to try, that will replace the old programs, and many people will move to those new programs. It will happen like that, and we can only follow the trend, so we can still make money from the program.
if there is something better than IEO, then I think IEO will also become history like the current ICO which has almost disappeared. however, nowadays people are looking for investments that have a profitable system on both sides. so investors can invest the money they have in developers who are really serious about the projects they will develop. IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
I don't think so, IEO that was done on a legitimate and trusted crypto exchange is much attractive and safe compared to all kind of kinds of fundraising that exist today If your so-called DYCO method is different and unique from others why it's not yet patronized by newly established projects? it sounds odd to me, But if DYCO was truly good, safe and effective well it deserves a break to replace the previous crowdfunding methods like ICO, STO etc. that was prone to scammers. The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
But I think it would also be polluted when it gains too much attention just like what happened to ICO,STO,IEO etc....
Possibly but presently there is no reason to let go of IEO, as for DYCO fund raising it would like to see what will happen in near future, if more projects uses DYCO crowdfunding and they become successful then attentions will be diverted from IEO to DYCO, anything is possible
There is no reason for projects to choose DYCO, IEO is doing well and many projects are successful with it. Therefore, new projects will not take risks and choose DYCO at the present time Possibly but presently there is no reason to let go of IEO, as for DYCO fund raising it would like to see what will happen in near future, if more projects uses DYCO crowdfunding and they become successful then attentions will be diverted from IEO to DYCO, anything is possible
DYCO has no demand and compared with IEO and it's still nothing. People have already known very well the mechanism that already used in DYCO but again it's not so good as IEO when speculators can earn a lot of money easily when the IEO token was getting a big pump.
Possibly but presently there is no reason to let go of IEO, as for DYCO fund raising it would like to see what will happen in near future, if more projects uses DYCO crowdfunding and they become successful then attentions will be diverted from IEO to DYCO, anything is possible
If this DYCO is really safe and profitable for investors just like IEO it can co exist with IEO it will greatly benefit the whole industry because now developers will now have two options for their crowdfunding and investors will pour their money on developers that uses both crowdfunding.
I'm sure if it is good it will create more news because this is really the first time I read about this DYCO thing
I'm sure if it is good it will create more news because this is really the first time I read about this DYCO thing
Presently it's impossible because investors feels more safer using IEO, they know that to make profits from IEO crowdfunding they have to choose projects from top exchanges, gate, binance, huobi etc, in Security IEO wins over ICO, it's not gonna fade any time soon.
I think so and as far as I can see that IEO is still having a lot of demand and that means IEO will always be the best way for a new project to raise the funds and so far IEO is always really profitable when it comes to the exchange legit exchange site. Presently it's impossible because investors feels more safer using IEO, they know that to make profits from IEO crowdfunding they have to choose projects from top exchanges, gate, binance, huobi etc, in Security IEO wins over ICO, it's not gonna fade any time soon.
I think so and as far as I can see that IEO is still having a lot of demand and that means IEO will always be the best way for a new project to raise the funds and so far IEO is always really profitable when it comes to the exchange legit exchange site. Presently it's impossible because investors feels more safer using IEO, they know that to make profits from IEO crowdfunding they have to choose projects from top exchanges, gate, binance, huobi etc, in Security IEO wins over ICO, it's not gonna fade any time soon.
Feeling safe does not mean that we will see more projects using IEO as it will go down like the ICO market because statistics will not lie, just take a look at some of the projects listed in top exchanges and how many got their profit and if you check those statistics you will understand how safe these are 
. In the initial period of the IEO craze many projects helped investors in making a good profit but it will not last that long. IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
Does not sound to be a realistic solution to me especially for crypto market where fud, panic and fear happens everyother day and people rush to sell even the news proves to be a rumor so such a fundraising campaign cannot be sustainable because each project takes time to fully develop and there are a lot of times during that period when the price dumps badly so with the current market psycology i am sure most people will ask for the 80% refund and in that case the project will not be able to continue, i fear. The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
IEO is open for public except those ban countries like US, like for an instance on Binance you need to register an account do KYC and hold at least 50 BNB but their IEO is lottery style so not everyone got a chance to buy. It is still open but there are so many requirements you need to comply, The IEO allocation is very small I have join several IEO before but I failed to get some share there are people that are faster than me I guess that is why some IEO shifted to lottery style so that it is fair for everyone it is based on luck.
IEO world was dead from the start, it was never something big that could sustain for a long period of time, it was always something that would definitely work out for the best if they stopped and not take peoples money. Think about it, it is literally ICO that is just based on an exchange that says they trust that coin and that's it. The only difference is something that a third party that makes a ton of profit from it says.
Why would people trust them? I mean sure some do and there was some IEO that made some money but in the end you are telling people "my coin will worth a lot in the future because binance will list it" and that is not really a good enough reason, you have trust the coin itself before you can invest into it, without that why would anyone trust something just because someone else said it.
Why would people trust them? I mean sure some do and there was some IEO that made some money but in the end you are telling people "my coin will worth a lot in the future because binance will list it" and that is not really a good enough reason, you have trust the coin itself before you can invest into it, without that why would anyone trust something just because someone else said it.
The reason why IEO will remain investors choice is because of reputations, for example binance doesn't only make it hard for low projects to make it to their Platform but also make sure they don't introduce scam IEO launchpads to their investors
Presently it's impossible because investors feels more safer using IEO, they know that to make profits from IEO crowdfunding they have to choose projects from top exchanges, gate, binance, huobi etc, in Security IEO wins over ICO, it's not gonna fade any time soon.
If there are still new projects that are better then IEO will continue to grow but if failures occur and IEO in large exchanges does not exist anymore then investors will also think hard about this IEO investment so that failed projects that often destroy this all.
The idea of DYCO is interesting, and I will say that I like it. We haven’t gotten to know much about it, as time goes on we will get to know about it. As for IEO, I think it has to do with the platform that the project running the token is using to launch it. There are some projects that launch their tokens using cheap exchanges that won’t be able to fetch them the level of audience (investors) that they will need to blow that project, and that’s why a lot of them fails. And that’s not the only thing , a project can also fail if people don’t like the idea of the devs.
So, lots of things can make a project not to be successful. And as for ICOs, I don’t think they are leaving (not anytime soon), people still are interested in them. Let’s wait and see the level of growth this newly introduced DYCO will achieve.
So, lots of things can make a project not to be successful. And as for ICOs, I don’t think they are leaving (not anytime soon), people still are interested in them. Let’s wait and see the level of growth this newly introduced DYCO will achieve.
Jump to: