Topic: IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon - page 5. (Read 720 times)
IEO is still in a good position in the hands of some big exchanges. Those exchanges have somehow fixed the IEO and are giving profits to the participants. So it seems to investors more interested to the IEO than ICO. However, no one knows the news behind it and no one keeps track of the market dump after the listing. So there will be some more time in the IEO market. And the scam exchanges, which have stolen the money of their own customers using the name of IEO, will not be able to stay in the market for long. So it seems to me that IEO will continue to be listed on the big exchanges in the days ahead.
Those who are giving their fundraising programme another name are only rebranding. IEO is still very much relevant and to me, it is still the best, most especially those that are done on bigger exchanges.
Even if the name is rebranded, in as much as it is doe on a reputable exchange, it is still a sister to IEO.
Even if the name is rebranded, in as much as it is doe on a reputable exchange, it is still a sister to IEO.
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
Lol I don't believe this sir, IEO is the best thing ever, for a new project to get listed on binance the team always make sure the project won't ruin their reputation, I like MakerDAO but I'm not sure they can screen new projects like how top exchanges can but IEO is still doing so well The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
No matter what type of crowdfunding method is used to collect the funds still all the funds are going to be in the hands of project team so its their responsibility to spend the collected money towards the development of the project as they proposed while collecting funds but most of them will slip from their promise and give just the words to the investors without actually any progress towards developing their project. The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
If DYCO actually promises to refund dissatisfied investors according to OP, this means it beats IEO in that regard. However, when comparing the all new DYCO and IEO, be sure to do side by side comparison with their pros and cons. The bottom line remains to achieve success in crowdfunding and also to exclude scam, so IEO still plays a big role for now and has been really helpful especially when done on reputable exchanges. I didn't really know orionprotocol made use of DYCO, sounds good.
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.
For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.
Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks
https://daomaker.com/dyco
This is really interesting information. Of course, for the development of the crypto market, as well as the market for crypto crowdfunding companies, new and improved systems are needed. We already know ICO, IEO and others and see how they work. I can’t say that they show excellent results, since very often problems arise with the same IEOs. Maybe DYCO will be a success, but it needs to get more attention and there should be more new crowdfunding companies on its base to show its efficiency. It is certainly important for the crypto community to have a stable system, as this would solve a number of problems in this direction. Thanks to your information, I will pay more attention to DYCO to understand how effective this system is.
The only project that still use DYCO for crowdfunding is origin protocol, I need to see more than just one project getting succeed through DYCO before I can give a try, I can still remember IMO till date if that still rings a bell, for now I prefer IEO, thanks for sharing
If DYCO can work very well and still requires not too costly money then it might be the best choice for small time project team who aren't well funded, at least they will stop using p2pb2b or vindax exchange
Another thing that's wrong but right about IEO projects are the fee of top exchanges for IEO launchpad, for example binance exchange requires way too much but I believe new projects who are damn serious about the success of their project should be able to come in agreement with binance team
IEO has no problem and I don't see the need for another fundraising right now, the only problem you can see with IEO projects are those that use shit exchanges like p2pb2b exchange or latoken.
DYCO is a nice model of token offering, crowdfunding should be a fair ecosystem for both investors and the project.
Investors are tired of scams, crypto space needs a working model for crowdfunding, Investors protection should be a priority and second is the projects transparency.
Investors are tired of scams, crypto space needs a working model for crowdfunding, Investors protection should be a priority and second is the projects transparency.
for the next few years from my point of view IEO is still feasible to use,
but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
Agree, IEOs only legit if they are on good exchange with strong support and liquidity. Although OP mentioned about DYCO but I don't see a lot of coins implement it, yet.but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
for the next few years from my point of view IEO is still feasible to use,
but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
Agree, IEOs only legit if they are on good exchange with strong support and liquidity. Although OP mentioned about DYCO but I don't see a lot of coins implement it, yet. but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
for the next few years from my point of view IEO is still feasible to use,
but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
but it must have certain criteria, is launch in large exchanges, and have good liquidity
DYCO can do better than IEO but saying IEO might soon be an history is a big joke, after good use case all a project needs is enough volume and good liquidity which top exchanges are ready to provide, any failed IEO projects failed because they choose small exchanges over top exchanges
...
disagree with your opinion here...IEO will last a long time because investors feel more secure buying coins on the exchange, especially reliable exchanges that have real trading volume. as an investor, I feel more confident when buying IEO coins in large exchanges such as Binance and kucoin.
Very hard to believe, any new project that use top exchanges to raise fund will surely be successful, IEO is very easy to understand just as that, all you need is top exchanges and you don't need to worry about things like lack of investors or lack of liquidity
It is seek for better transparency and also, probability of reducing risk of being scammed that lead to IEO but the result so far is not encouraging because it has been hijacked by useless exchange platforms that have turned it to business rather accepting project with a lot of prospect. I don't think IEO will be the thing of the past because even before its popularity, some exchange such as binance already have a launchpad that offer the same features. The worst that could happen is to be witnessing less and lesser people that will invest in crypto project
I think at the moment IEO which are conducted on big exchanges like Binance, Kucoin, Okex etc almost 90% were succeeded and investors had invested. But if IEO is from low rating Exchanges than 90% chance that the project go in scam category.
IEOs and ICOs are nearly dead. I haven't heard this DYCO but these crowd funding will never stop reinventing the name and the scheme that they'll offer to the investors. They have to change their style in a manner that their offering a real thing and working product.
I thought that this time is the best for those decentralized finance and also the centralized finance. Those platforms that are offering it are the ones who are going up lately.
Saying IEO and ICO are near their dead bed is unacceptable because it's like you saying binance exchange and other big exchanges aren't performing very well with new IEO projects anymore, IEO still rocks and once binance and other top exchanges start giving bad IEO results then I will belief its the end for IEO I thought that this time is the best for those decentralized finance and also the centralized finance. Those platforms that are offering it are the ones who are going up lately.
IEOs and ICOs are nearly dead. I haven't heard this DYCO but these crowd funding will never stop reinventing the name and the scheme that they'll offer to the investors. They have to change their style in a manner that their offering a real thing and working product.
I thought that this time is the best for those decentralized finance and also the centralized finance. Those platforms that are offering it are the ones who are going up lately.
IEO is still performing well in this market, I still see a lot of projects are successfully raising funds with IEO and prices have increased many times compared to the beginning. Choose the IEO of the top exchanges in this market to be as safe as possible I thought that this time is the best for those decentralized finance and also the centralized finance. Those platforms that are offering it are the ones who are going up lately.
Jump to: