Topic: IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon - page 3. (Read 720 times)
Anything is possible, IEO can become history in few years time if another better crowdfunding takes over, remember that working doesn't mean surviving, once new developers find interest in DYCO it will oy take few months and IEO will slowly fade away, it's not about because it's working
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong?
Wrong. How can you say its not an public offering as they offered token for sale? The only thing about those IEO held on big platforms are they using lottery system to pick out the winners of their token sale since a lot of investors will probably participate. Like most investors they are confident with the listing of those IEO cause it was handled by top exchanges like Binance, kucoin and okex. IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong?
Wrong. How can you say its not an public offering as they offered token for sale? The only thing about those IEO held on big platforms are they using lottery system to pick out the winners of their token sale since a lot of investors will probably participate. Like most investors they are confident with the listing of those IEO cause it was handled by top exchanges like Binance, kucoin and okex.
There are less and less IEOs today, so the new way of fundraising for crypto projects might appear soon. As of DYCO, only one project held it at the moment having a miserable Hard Cap, so it is too early to say about DYCO prospects.
If you can all go through the features that DYCO fundraising is offering you will see that there is no room for scam projects, every projects that will accept DYCO conditions have to room for exit scam, DYCO rules are like trap for scam projects, I believe it will be popular in few more months
Well IEO has benefits of its own and the major one is instant exchange listing. TBT I have never heard of DYCO before today and what I liked the most about it is as you said that they will keep aside 80% of the funds to buyback tokens from the dissatisfied customer.
Orion Protocol crowdfunding was a success, I don't blame OP for seeing things this way and now Orion Protocol is aiming for more top exchanges, it's a total success if you ask me, we still can't judge or put DYCO and IEO head to head because DYCO only performed well in it's first crowdfunding, id say let's wait for more good news?
One thing is constant in life and that is "change", in as much as all the development is in order to make Bitcoin better, all updates is welcomed, when we were using ICO constantly, we never thought IEO could be better untill it came.
Another thing I wished could be checked properly is the creation of fake projects. I'm sure this cannot be done by a novice, they are people that are traceable, it needs an Intervention too.
Another thing I wished could be checked properly is the creation of fake projects. I'm sure this cannot be done by a novice, they are people that are traceable, it needs an Intervention too.
It seems you been overwhelmed by dyco first list orion protocol result when it started trading. Actually thats how hype created, we all knew that the token is highly tradede because of it. Also I like yo add that dyco has specific approach or have insurance to investors. So it likely to be invested by a lot of people. I like IEO on top exchanges but some of them in the shit exchange were completely useless. IEO would never fade I think and would not be like forgotten ICO of 2017.
Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come
Well, I think that it is normal if IEO soon will be a history in the crypto because the trend will change, and there will be a new trend that will attract more people or new people to comes to the crypto world. That happens too in the real world, and we don't have to surprise that, and we can prepare for the next new trend in the crypto world. Meanwhile, if you are still making a profit from the IEO, you can still search for another project to make more profit from crypto. 
Let's accept that DYCO becomes more impressive than all IEO can do combined, this won't eradicate IEO still because IEO has no problem, the choice will be left for new developers, they will choose between IEO or DYCO, that's if DYCO ever works well though
Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come
When more people like you and I, start ignoring IEOs then it will become a history regardless of top exchanges are still into business or not; I just notify you about the other possibility for making IEO a history 
. When IEO checks all the basics of crowdfunding and it is being conducted only for reasonable projects after enough due diligence then I guess it will survive forever; otherwise people will start ignoring when they find more projects are not keeping their words.We can still say that IEO is worthy enough if it is listed at least in the moderate exchange that has good trading volume and at least listed on CMC.
That is because of their dedicated userbase. What about the success rate of all listed projects? They have started delivering what they have promised? How many of coins/tokens have returned its IEO contributors more than 10% return so far. If the percentage is more than 50% of project then we can assume like IEO is doing by checking all the basics of crowdfunding.We are not here concerned about the success of a project's crowdfunding results when they try with IEO but we need more detailed information about those IEO contributors along with their ROI.
A crowdfunding may be expired in certain period. But for IEO, it may not end as soon as possible. SO far, IEO is better than ICO and it is mostly used for current new projects. However, we also cannot say that this is the best way because IEO may be not good if listing the coin/token in the small exchange with small trading volume It will not be good for the development of the coin/token itself. We can still say that IEO is worthy enough if it is listed at least in the moderate exchange that has good trading volume and at least listed on CMC.
Why?
Because, if we are offered a new coin listed in IEO, the first one to ask is "what exchange?".
IN this case,as long as the team chooses more to the good exchanges, I believe that IEO will still last longer. However, if most new projects only list the or new coins in small and not worthy exchange, be ready that it may end in several years or months.
Why?
Because, if we are offered a new coin listed in IEO, the first one to ask is "what exchange?".
IN this case,as long as the team chooses more to the good exchanges, I believe that IEO will still last longer. However, if most new projects only list the or new coins in small and not worthy exchange, be ready that it may end in several years or months.
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?
Left to me i believe IEO's are public offerings and it has been more secured than ICO, The entire market had enough of every project coming up just to scam investors but since the beginning of IEO, i can assure you that projects that Launch IEO on top exchanges such as Binance and Gate hardly exit scam. Infact I'm not sure if any has exited scam so far but the rate of scams has reduced if you invest in IEO's on major exchange...the button line is, i believe IEO is here to stay
IEO has come to stay, even during the ICO boom exchanges were still doing IEO but not at the current rate, nothing is wrong with IEO, it is a win-win situation for everyone involved. I do not fancy buy back, buy back is different from burning (Burning is used when a project makes profit and use part of the profit to buy tokens from the market unlike buy back that happens when the team use part of the ICO money to buy tokens instead of development
But OP is stating some flaws about IEO's basic mechanism like it is lagging in transparency I am not sure that the government approved stocks are doing the same thing about transparency while they are entering into crowdfunding. OP is not providing sufficient external references to support his claim. When there is something wrong in the basic fundamentals of IEO, I guess that needs to be fixed before exchanges will be swallowing innocent investors' all the money.We cannot simply assume that there will be nothing wrong with the currently ongoing IEO model. It has fully become centralized compare to when ICOs went being conducted on this forum. Always centralized things are known for manipulation and possible hidden things. This is the reason I cannot simply ignore what OP is emphasizing.
Centralized exchanges owns IEO success and saying IEO will be history means top exchanges like binance will be out of business, well it's completely hard to accept this fact of yours, IEO and Centralized exchanges are one and it will be like that for many years to come
IEO has come to stay, even during the ICO boom exchanges were still doing IEO but not at the current rate, nothing is wrong with IEO, it is a win-win situation for everyone involved. I do not fancy buy back, buy back is different from burning (Burning is used when a project makes profit and use part of the profit to buy tokens from the market unlike buy back that happens when the team use part of the ICO money to buy tokens instead of development
IEO is coming to an end, it has been around for more than 2 years and has helped a lot of projects successfully raise capital, but then those projects are also unable to develop and deliver products to the community. Now only the IEOs at the top exchanges in this market can provide profit to investors
From the beginning, the top exchange IEO was better than any other crowdfunding. Only a few top exchange IEO failed, including Binance exchange. Actually the top exchange IEO didn't provide a good return to investors without a few IEO. The best time is during the correction time of a good volume coin. 
So far IEO is doing good it is still well supported by investors, as long as Binance is doing this IEO is still preferred by investors, I don't know much about this DYCO crowdfunding, but if this is legal and trusted and will yield profit for investors why not, we need to protect investors because they are the life of any project.
At least we can have IEOs as a trusted method when it is on renowned exchanges. ICOs are managed by the projects itself but its not trustworthy. Maytimes it is observed with few ICOs that they don't update the fund raised value until it is completed.
There was another method applied by a few projects like VELIc is IAO. Initial auction offering. I think as far as fund raising is transparent and with trust, any method should work fine.
There was another method applied by a few projects like VELIc is IAO. Initial auction offering. I think as far as fund raising is transparent and with trust, any method should work fine.
Jump to: