Pages:
Author

Topic: IEO might soon become an history in crypto world soon - page 4. (Read 734 times)

full member
Activity: 785
Merit: 105
IEO is coming to an end, it has been around for more than 2 years and has helped a lot of projects successfully raise capital, but then those projects are also unable to develop and deliver products to the community. Now only the IEOs at the top exchanges in this market can provide profit to investors
IEO is still performing well in this market, currently there are still many successful projects with IEO and helping many investors to be profitable. Only the ICO is dead and if any project implements an ICO, it is quite sure they are a scam
full member
Activity: 983
Merit: 100
IEO projects are better than ICO, why? because we can distinguish IEO from good and bad,
while ICO is very difficult for us to distinguish, so IEO is much better
Actually, we can distinguish between the two fundraising programs, only for ICO is a little more difficult to distinguish, because the flow is almost the same in all projects, but that is not something that cannot be done, and for IEO it is indeed very clear to distinguish it , because IEO is made in the exchange, so the difference can be seen also through good exchange or bad exchange.
member
Activity: 669
Merit: 10
Soon is a stretch definition when I haven't yet seen any reliable method of raising fund that could replace IEO effective. Sure not every IEO promise back profit but they are mile better than ICO and if some thing want to replace it, they also need to mile better than the current IEO.
IEO projects are better than ICO, why? because we can distinguish IEO from good and bad,
while ICO is very difficult for us to distinguish, so IEO is much better
hero member
Activity: 3066
Merit: 629
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
IEO is still performing well in this market, I still see a lot of projects are successfully raising funds with IEO and prices have increased many times compared to the beginning. Choose the IEO of the top exchanges in this market to be as safe as possible
If that's what you think about IEO, ok. But to me, it's also going with the same path as the ICOs did. The factor is big if the IEO is being done on a known exchange so that's why I have said nearly, and soon they might be dead for real once there's nothing new anymore about them.

Saying IEO and ICO are near their dead bed is unacceptable because it's like you saying binance exchange and other big exchanges aren't performing very well with new IEO projects anymore, IEO still rocks and once binance and other top exchanges start giving bad IEO results then I will belief its the end for IEO
It's ok if you can't accept it, that's only an opinion of mine. It's nearly to be like that but as long as it survives then that's ok for IEO supporters and investors.
member
Activity: 124
Merit: 10
Soon is a stretch definition when I haven't yet seen any reliable method of raising fund that could replace IEO effective. Sure not every IEO promise back profit but they are mile better than ICO and if some thing want to replace it, they also need to mile better than the current IEO.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 22
It's only something that doesn't work becomes history, IEO works better than ICO through top exchanges and I'm loving it, right now I don't even pray for another ways to raise funds, quack new projects are the only projects that will have problem raising funds through top exchanges
sr. member
Activity: 499
Merit: 250
Chainjoes.com
I don't think IEO is a public offering and this is more like an event listing on an exchange, but this certainly won't be easy to disappear because I think that until next year IEO will still be there because it's like an ICO trend that hasn't been lost even though people investing in ICO It's been drastically reduced, if there is something new this is a good thing, I just found out about DYCO in terms of the concept is quite interesting and seems to be the next trend like IEO.
Most people come to IEO for profit and after they have made enough money they will tend to leave the project. I am familiar with this and if the IEO project is launched at reputable exchanges like Binance, the investor will skip the evaluation and quickly look for opportunities to participate. I guess, IEO will always exist in this market and will certainly be better than ICO so if you are considering then should only choose IEO projects at the exchanges that people often recommend.
full member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 158
IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO
ICO is even still existed until today even it's not so impressive as IEO. As long as the key of ICO that called exchange site will be alive and there was no reason for IEO to be another history in the future.
DYCO is not getting hyped caused by it's an overrated mechanism. People still prefer with IEO

People prefer IEO on top exchanges like Binance. But for other substandard exchanges, IEO is not an attractive launchpad especially those with low trading volumes. The case of Binance is different, because before a project is accepted to their launchpad, Binance is very strict and is doing their investigation per se. However, there are still few projects that can surpass their strict selection. But in any case, people trust more if Binance is handling the IEO. Right now, IEO is still alive but if projects continue to fall even with BNB management, IEO will also be a history soon.
sr. member
Activity: 1063
Merit: 253
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO
ICO is even still existed until today even it's not so impressive as IEO. As long as the key of ICO that called exchange site will be alive and there was no reason for IEO to be another history in the future.
DYCO is not getting hyped caused by it's an overrated mechanism. People still prefer with IEO
hero member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 594
IEO isn't bad only because of exchanges, all these crypto offerings are inherently flawed, because it's a perfect model for scamming - scammers stay anonymous on the Internet, offer people to buy useless digital coins with a promise that one day they will be useful, but in reality there is no mechanism for verifying that these developers will even lift a finger to developer the product.
Specially after the developers got the needed funding, the thought to exit scam will be present. And as we all know, this is just a rehearse of an old ICO model, nothing has change a bit, except that this is being run or launch from a supposedly reputed exchange. But it didn't mitigate the risk that the people behind can still scam people and developers are not going to give a shit as long as they are making easy money from gullible individuals, IEO will not stop.
full member
Activity: 497
Merit: 110
arcs-chain.com
I don't think that IEO will became a history all I can say it will remain and IEO was upgraded unlike ICO that became the history because they didn't change the way they run to run a funds for now who is the one that upgrade into something it will be remain and the people like the IEO because it was handle on the exchange itself they don't need a gas to transfer their funds into exchange.
legendary
Activity: 3024
Merit: 2148
IEO isn't bad only because of exchanges, all these crypto offerings are inherently flawed, because it's a perfect model for scamming - scammers stay anonymous on the Internet, offer people to buy useless digital coins with a promise that one day they will be useful, but in reality there is no mechanism for verifying that these developers will even lift a finger to developer the product.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 255
SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE
Although we can't rule out the fact that it might be hard for IEO to become history but we can also have in mind that change is the only thing that is constant in this world, and the crypto space is not exempted. Yes, IEO is very legit unlike ICO or better still, IEO on good exchanges are worthwhile which has reduced exit scam to a lowest minimum but what if another method comes up with better features? There will be a competition and the one that users finds more favourable will win, that is to say users are the determinant factor of which fundraising method that will work or not. But till then, let's continue using IEO as it is still working well till date until a better one comes up.
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 252
Futurov
IEOs are not public offerings, which entirely misses the principle of crowdfunding, am I right or wrong? ICO is the only fundraising strategy that works wonders publicly but since we have no better crowdfunding than the not so transparent crowdfunding (IEO) we just have to accept things as they are presently?

The only crowdfunding I'm looking forward to is DYCO ( dynamic coin offering) which I once thought was a complete joke but not until Orion Protocol used this crowdfunding platform to raise fund and the result were satisfying, DYCO is from DAO MAKER and it is designed to increase the effectiveness of token fundraising events.

For the first 16 months after token distribution, the entire circulating supply is backed by USDC. 80% of the funds raised initially are set aside to be used to buy back tokens from dissatisfied holders.

Note: I'm just sharing this on my own, I'm not part of DYCO team and I'm not paid to do this, if you want to learn more about DYCO check the link down below, thanks

https://daomaker.com/dyco

not so fast, because the demands on IEO still high my friend
maybe someday IEO will be a history just like STO, but as i said before thats need more time
about Dyco, i just heard this crowfunding methode from you
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.
Not all new projects deserved to be here, Cartesi get listed on binance because the team are prepared, I'd say if new devs aren't prepared for successful fundraising they shouldn't launch their projects, IEO still works and I like the fact that without top exchanges you can't get good results
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 710
I don't think IEO is a public offering and this is more like an event listing on an exchange, but this certainly won't be easy to disappear because I think that until next year IEO will still be there because it's like an ICO trend that hasn't been lost even though people investing in ICO It's been drastically reduced, if there is something new this is a good thing, I just found out about DYCO in terms of the concept is quite interesting and seems to be the next trend like IEO.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.
I understand, it's very hard for some new projects to go on binance and other top exchanges because of their high requirements but isn't this the reason why we have less bad projects on top exchanges? That's the part you missing
hero member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 577
Eventually project team will make the decision of which fundraising system will be much better for them to raise funds to support their project, I also think ieo are not 100% the sure way to raise funds especially for new startup projects because the conditions of some exchange are often too difficult for this new project to meet up with, at the end, the project will not be able to raise the desired funds required to start project development,
Am not very familiar with dyco but whatever will be better and much secure for new projects to raise funds will be a great idea, if dyco system of fundraising will be better than what we have at present, then I think project team should make their decision accordingly.
sr. member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 260
In 2016-2018 cryptoworld was flooded with a huge large number of ICOs, among which more than 70% were fake. When all were searing for a solution the IEO brought the solution to bring back the trust on the legit projects. If you ask people to invest now 90 out of 100 times they will choose IEO over the ICO.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 29
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
IEO is still going to be around for a very long time to come, it works better than ICO in terms of reliability, all it's gonna cost is top exchanges and the result will definitely be a satisfying one, DYCO can work out but can't beat IEO
Pages:
Jump to: