You are right now no one personally research about the project, almost every one just look at the exchange where IEO plan to be conducted, It is really harmful for individuals and for crypto market too.
Why is it harmful to the crypto market? I think it will help a lot for this market. Eliminate ICO scammer, help investors make profit from investment. Now we do not need to study too many projects because the IEO projects in large exchanges are mostly good and potential projects. 
Topic: IEO's has cause more harm done good (Read 872 times)
Well, one thing I strongly believe is that there is nothing with an advantage that doesn't have a disadvantage, we are know that IEO was introduced into the crypto sphere for a good reason, being that we had a lot of scammers in the ICO space making away with participants money everyday making them give up on crypto as a whole, I know that people don't really make their research about project anymore since they believe that the IEO is being conducted on trusted exchanges but I think it's a good thing that we are not being scammed anymore as we used to be, I believe something better would be introduced in the future to make users focus on studying what the project is about.
The arrival of IEO's has cause more harm done good in the sense that many do not seek to make their own research about projects that's are involve in IEO, everyone is made to believe the exchanges are in control and are bound to think the exchanges are in best position to know better and hence expect that the due deligence be done by them, but trust me most of this exchanges are rather soiling the space and aiding most of this projects to mislead investors....
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
I would agree and also disagree. For one, you cannot blame other people for your own personal failure to do the right thing. In the crypto world, its a silent rule that everyman for himself and every invention or initiative geared towards making the market a better place should be welcome with open hands just like the IEO initiative amongst others. Eventually, the market is still evolving and we should be ready to evolve with and make the most out of it.
yes, because all the crowfundings on crypto are always same there must be some losses and for this ieo alone it brings huge losses because many ieo get tens of millions of dollars, but it proved to be a scam, but this is not too severe compared to ico in 2017/2018, and if you want to join ieo now maybe you should do a very thorough due diligence if you don't want to get a scam project.
IEOs are atleast not turning into scam, so I do not think IEOs have made more harm to the community. Token price appreciation is not guaranteed either in IEO or in ICO, it depends upon demand and supply but atleast IEOs are real projects and getting listed on exchanges, on the other hand many ICOs are taking investors money and running away. IEOs are atleast helping investors to get back their investment confidence. Its investors duty to properly research the project before making any investment decision.
Yes, some of ieo's are misleading their investors and they gone as a failure project! and investors loosing their money which invested over this kind of shit project!
IEO is a new idea for making quick profits to early investors. I think that's better than ICO. IEO is entirely controlled by the exchanger. the team only operates their products.
systemically and how it works maybe IEO is indeed better and newer. but in success, IEO has not been able to make as many investments into the crypto market as ICO has done. it's very difficult, and maybe it will take a long time for IEO.
False, IEOs is giving many project teams a second chance to raise funds for project development. IEOs are better than ICOs. and they are much needed. We learn when a crypto project fails, It helps to create a better crypto space in the long run.
ieo's for me is good when it comes to liquidation because the company's coin/token will have a ready platform to buy or sell when the crowdfunding conclude. For me, it did not affect the way i analyze projects, we need to be careful when choosing a project to invest into, just because it has a ready market does not mean that people can now be lazy in doing their own research but i also believe about what u said that lots of people are not doing their research properly anymore bcoz of ieo's.
Big exchanges are doing own good reasearches which may be better than yours. So i think that IEO is a good thing
IEO is a new idea for making quick profits to early investors. I think that's better than ICO. IEO is entirely controlled by the exchanger. the team only operates their products.
IEOs have actually done more good than harm. But it is true that due diligence is not being done by the investors towards researching further on projects as they leave all to the exchange to do. However in terms of security, I think IEO has reinforced trust in crowdfunding for crypto projects
That's purely an accusation to hear, because we haven't yet witnessed how IEO works right now. So don't judge until there is really a proof of the current situation. We shoul be more observant to the actual outcome and don't ever speculate negatively until there's definite judgement over it.
In fact, only 20% of IEO projects can help investors to make big profits and IEO investment is less risky than ICO investment so I believe that IEO is still an investment trend that people want in this market. Personally, I still prefer to invest in IEO because it makes it easier for me to earn double profit in a short time and if lucky, making a profit x5 easy if the IEO is listed at big exchange.
I also prefer IEO. Hate it if you guys want but the fact that huge exchanges are the ones who makes the due diligence for us on the projects before getting listed is a big YES for me. Didn't you guys realize that the numbers of projects are getting flitered thanks to IEOs? In ICOs, 100 and above projects every months that you need to do your own research and considering the current situation, nobody gets roi in it anymore makes it hard to attract investor. While in IEO, you only monitor 10 or less projects every month if you only count those high-volume exchanges that gives 2x-20x returns. So I don't totally agreee cause IEOs more harm.
Maybe the op is pointing to some unsuccesful ieo's that is runned by new exchanges . this type of ieo's can do harm to the investors because they could loose thier money in an instant as soon as they fall for this trap . but the rest of the ieo's are already proven to be safe and profitable like what you guys said . we wont know , maybe op is also one of the victim of scammy ieo's and he already loose big , this could be the reason why he accused ieo's so bad
That's purely an accusation to hear, because we haven't yet witnessed how IEO works right now. So don't judge until there is really a proof of the current situation. We shoul be more observant to the actual outcome and don't ever speculate negatively until there's definite judgement over it.
In fact, only 20% of IEO projects can help investors to make big profits and IEO investment is less risky than ICO investment so I believe that IEO is still an investment trend that people want in this market. Personally, I still prefer to invest in IEO because it makes it easier for me to earn double profit in a short time and if lucky, making a profit x5 easy if the IEO is listed at big exchange.
I also prefer IEO. Hate it if you guys want but the fact that huge exchanges are the ones who makes the due diligence for us on the projects before getting listed is a big YES for me. Didn't you guys realize that the numbers of projects are getting flitered thanks to IEOs? In ICOs, 100 and above projects every months that you need to do your own research and considering the current situation, nobody gets roi in it anymore makes it hard to attract investor. While in IEO, you only monitor 10 or less projects every month if you only count those high-volume exchanges that gives 2x-20x returns. So I don't totally agreee cause IEOs more harm.
The arrival of IEO's has cause more harm done good in the sense that many do not seek to make their own research about projects that's are involve in IEO, everyone is made to believe the exchanges are in control and are bound to think the exchanges are in best position to know better and hence expect that the due deligence be done by them, but trust me most of this exchanges are rather soiling the space and aiding most of this projects to mislead investors....
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
I think it is not considered harmful. It is beneficial for our economy. Those who like to invest without understanding, they will suffer losses and that cash flow will return to the pockets of smart people.Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
After that, the more intelligent people get richer, the more they will grow and will help the society with charitable activities later.
For those who fail, they will be humiliated and motivated to study.
That's purely an accusation to hear, because we haven't yet witnessed how IEO works right now. So don't judge until there is really a proof of the current situation. We shoul be more observant to the actual outcome and don't ever speculate negatively until there's definite judgement over it.
In fact, only 20% of IEO projects can help investors to make big profits and IEO investment is less risky than ICO investment so I believe that IEO is still an investment trend that people want in this market. Personally, I still prefer to invest in IEO because it makes it easier for me to earn double profit in a short time and if lucky, making a profit x5 easy if the IEO is listed at big exchange.
I sense same in your direction of thinking but the issue am having is the way those ieo coin got pumped just to mislead the investors which we all know the listing of those coins are not guarantee their best as a good coin but shit.
Some exchange has capitalize on this to pump their own coin regardless of what the coin has to offer and also used the opportunity to make the coin believe they are the best and yet have nothing to offer.
Some exchange has capitalize on this to pump their own coin regardless of what the coin has to offer and also used the opportunity to make the coin believe they are the best and yet have nothing to offer.
That's purely an accusation to hear, because we haven't yet witnessed how IEO works right now. So don't judge until there is really a proof of the current situation. We shoul be more observant to the actual outcome and don't ever speculate negatively until there's definite judgement over it.
Disagree, because it's impossible for someone to risk their funds only to a well-known exchange place, besides that there must be investors doing personal research for each project whose IEO takes place.
l always repeat and stick to the point that, IEO projects give the most confidence to investors than ICO projects. Most investors don't make research themselves, it happens because of negligence. They believe projects but as mentioned above they never make enough research and read the whitepaper, analyzes by the ICO rating sites. They are only interested in making more BTC on the next pump, because of that most of these projects mislead investors.
The team of so many projects usually claim that IEO will bring about development. Although, it is one of the easiest and fastest means of fundraising for most projects struggling to raise fund. However, some investors have really lost fund on projects that that do not have real use cases.
Jump to: