I do not totally agree with you because IEO has not really stopped cryptocurrency enthusiasts quit making personal researches on the IEO they seek to invest rather, it has also helped newbies in making investment decisions without thinking hard. And finally, the security of funds it offers cannot be over emphasised.
I have the same thought with you mate, Exchange site try to provide a way to help the newbies to get the easiest to invest in the crypto. not so many people are good in the ICO research. I can take a conclusion if IEO offers more pros than cons. 
Topic: IEO's has cause more harm done good - page 5. (Read 872 times)
analysis is pretty good, I also agree with you, but not all exchangers,
I do not believe the IEO on an exchanger with a small volume or a reputation that is not good, but for exchangers such as huobi, kucoin and binance I am sure they will not arbitrarily choose projects for IEO there, because the stakes are the good name of their exchanger.
I do not believe the IEO on an exchanger with a small volume or a reputation that is not good, but for exchangers such as huobi, kucoin and binance I am sure they will not arbitrarily choose projects for IEO there, because the stakes are the good name of their exchanger.
Although you have a point but I do not concur with all you said. Even during ICOs there are investors who fails to make their research thus participating in bad ICOs. Same is with IEOs, we shouldn't throw caution to the wind because it is being done on exchanges anyone doing that is left to blame.
funds and tokens are fully controlled by the exchange and there is no interference from the team, if you still doubt you have to follow the IEO in a big exchange. so far the IEO has raised more funds than the ICO.
Complex issue. I do not think that IEO somehow changes the market. It’s just a different tool, don’t give it such a big deal! You are exaggerating. Think again: what has changed in the market over the past 6 months?
You have a point here, most of the investors/crypto enthusiasts are thinking that if the project is launched in Binance it is a legit and good project because the exchange is backing it but that is not the case because the developer of the project is on their own and the exchange is out of it.
How did you know that people decided not to research before investing to it? Maybe some but most investor will still take a look on how the project work especially if it can be a long term investment. Remember, hsving the project into IEO to big exchanges such as binance etc. can be a plus but it doesnt mean that it will be successful.
Actually, whatever the crowdfunding system used, as an investor, we must be more and more careful, smarter, and also wiser. Only because it is an IEO, we should believe at all? Not at all. We must still analyze the projects whole from their ideas, team, until what exchanges to be used for IEO. Beware of scammers. they are still around us.
The arrival of IEO's has cause more harm done good in the sense that many do not seek to make their own research about projects that's are involve in IEO, everyone is made to believe the exchanges are in control and are bound to think the exchanges are in best position to know better and hence expect that the due deligence be done by them, but trust me most of this exchanges are rather soiling the space and aiding most of this projects to mislead investors....
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
Your argument is quite reasonable, indeed, after the IEO program, there were many investors who neglected to get to know the project more deeply. but if we look in terms of exchanges, is it possible that they are doing so contamination only for something small, whereas what they get can be much bigger than that dirty thing? Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
You are right and i agree with you but there is a way out to avoid this situation and that is to participate in IEOs only at top trusted platform like binance because they will never list a bad quality project as they have a lot at stake, even if you analyse all the projects they have listed as IEOs till now all of them are real legit projects and they are performing better than most of the alts.
The existence of ieos have been rewarding and beneficial
It has brought quick profits to both projects and investors
People tend to invest first in ieo before researching
It has brought quick profits to both projects and investors
People tend to invest first in ieo before researching
Well i joined and participated in IEO just because of it's quick profit. I rather quickly sell my investment right after the tokens get listed on the exchange. Of course i won't join IEO on bad exchange (low tier) , IEO that i joined are only top tier exchange, such as Binance, Okex, and also Kucoin.
Many investors are after the few bucks profit when in the private or early investor. If they do IEO all the time, where do they put those guys who are willing to send BTC and ETH to the projects who are just into this scheme? IEO is just too transparent for anyone to join to and there are only limited tokens to be sold. I guess some don't wanna let exchanges knew they invest in startups.
Disagree, because it's impossible for someone to risk their funds only to a well-known exchange place, besides that there must be investors doing personal research for each project whose IEO takes place.
The arrival of IEO's has cause more harm done good in the sense that many do not seek to make their own research about projects that's are involve in IEO, everyone is made to believe the exchanges are in control and are bound to think the exchanges are in best position to know better and hence expect that the due deligence be done by them, but trust me most of this exchanges are rather soiling the space and aiding most of this projects to mislead investors....
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
When we understand that exchanges are here for their profits then we don't trust them upto this level.Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
Anyway the hype or the blind trust will just stay for few months after that people will get better at knowing it and the actual market condition will replicate.
I do not totally agree with you because IEO has not really stopped cryptocurrency enthusiasts quit making personal researches on the IEO they seek to invest rather, it has also helped newbies in making investment decisions without thinking hard. And finally, the security of funds it offers cannot be over emphasised.
I agree with you when you say IEOs have made investors to relax on personal research by relying on the fact that the exchange must have done due diligence before hosting the IEO. But on the other hand, I totally disagree with your topic stating IEOs have done more harm than good. IEOs have revived the lost confidence in investing in token sale, which was doomed by ICOs. IEO guarantees listing on exchange which is not guaranteed by ICO.
The arrival of IEO's has cause more harm done good in the sense that many do not seek to make their own research about projects that's are involve in IEO, everyone is made to believe the exchanges are in control and are bound to think the exchanges are in best position to know better and hence expect that the due deligence be done by them, but trust me most of this exchanges are rather soiling the space and aiding most of this projects to mislead investors....
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
Agreed or Disagree? Argue it out
Jump to: