Pages:
Author

Topic: If Satoshi came out with bitcoin2.0 would you use it? let`s say he used his keys - page 3. (Read 888 times)

hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 505
Seems to me Bitcoin can and will evolve as need arrises, so the idea of btc2.0 is kinda moot..
Just another greedy pin-head fantasy for the likes of Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Craig Wright.
Everyone is creating their own alt coins and claiming it to be bitcoin and making a ton of money from it, even if Satoshi comes out and create something, it will be another alt coin and since all the spin offs from bitcoin is having a huge market valuation, bitcoin 2.0 will also have a huge market cap and there is no doubt about it but nothing can replace bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
^^^ The first Bitcoin Core is still in beta. If the Devs don't change it, anyone who creates a new version will o nly be creating an altcoin.

Ongoing development - Bitcoin software is still in beta with many incomplete features in active development. New tools, features, and services are being developed to make Bitcoin more secure and accessible to the masses. Some of these are still not ready for everyone. Most Bitcoin businesses are new and still offer no insurance. In general, Bitcoin is still in the process of maturing.

Cool
full member
Activity: 317
Merit: 110
Seems to me Bitcoin can and will evolve as need arrises, so the idea of btc2.0 is kinda moot..
Just another greedy pin-head fantasy for the likes of Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Craig Wright.

Like saying having an Internet 2.0 and moving everyone there...

We are already there and Bitcoin is moving with us....

Sooner the greedy dicks are left behind the better. IMHO...hahaha
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
I just had the sickest idea how to tie bitcoin"core" into bitcoin2.0 so both would be useful. Hey Satoshi hit me up if you want to save the world from us humans. I think the miners would love this and the investors also the average Joe using it. It would only make both the values go up and stop poverty world wide.
sr. member
Activity: 625
Merit: 258
If that would happen and he proven himself being the one and only then i would wait to see evidence on how much capabilities Bitcoin 2.0 would provide us.
What sort ot network improvements would be released thus making Bitcoin 2.0 one of a kind.
From those perspectives i would chose to move into 2.0 version or stay at current one.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address  1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Even if someone is able to sign in with the genesis address and asked to convert the coins to their upcoming new coin and promises a better technology, no one in the right sense will do that as the market has grown to a point that it cannot be replaced in a short period of time, if it was the early days with a few users then there would be a possibility but not anymore.  Wink

This experiment was never about Satoshi Nakamoto, but rather the technology that was supposed to "replace" or "disrupt" the corrupt Banking system. Now Banks have started to use Satoshi's code against him, by creating their own "Blockchain" based coins.
What if Satoshi comes out and patents and copyrights his creation and ask for royalty from everyone who use them, then there will be a massive disruption  Cheesy Tongue.


That is how you do copyright, with blockchain tech, You know what they used to do and still do, you go for a patent with your idea on paper and behind closed doors they clone their paper date to earlier date than yours and steal your patent anyways, with blockchain this cannot happen.

But yah If I were him I would be going after bitcoin.com Because they are using his trade mark, I know other developers here who are getting attacked by the banks just for having part of their name in it, and were in the cyrpto space 4 years even before the government or banks knew what it was, that is the full name www.bitcoin.com right there and they are walking away scot-free. derailing the btc project.  Anyways don`t get fooled www.bitcoin.org is the real one.

Bitpatent if anyone wants to make it, do it up!
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address  1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Even if someone is able to sign in with the genesis address and asked to convert the coins to their upcoming new coin and promises a better technology, no one in the right sense will do that as the market has grown to a point that it cannot be replaced in a short period of time, if it was the early days with a few users then there would be a possibility but not anymore.  Wink

This experiment was never about Satoshi Nakamoto, but rather the technology that was supposed to "replace" or "disrupt" the corrupt Banking system. Now Banks have started to use Satoshi's code against him, by creating their own "Blockchain" based coins.
What if Satoshi comes out and patents and copyrights his creation and ask for royalty from everyone who use them, then there will be a massive disruption  Cheesy Tongue.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023
Whatever might be the technology with the bitcoin 2.0, one that existed initially will hold the value. The second version will be the one derived from the first one. Some user have mentioned it comparing to the ethereum classic, still ethereum leads the market. Ethereum classic gained good support just because of ethereum. Same will happen with bitcoin 2.0 as well.
The market determines which version will be the go to project when it comes to crypto currencies and you really cannot compare ETH and ETH classic split with the hypothetical situation OP is talking about. The former split occurred because of the dictatorship method in which they forked the coin when a massive hack happened in the network and we all know the fate of ETC. The fact is that the market has grown beyond the scope of Satoshi and the better technology will always prevail.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
This experiment was never about Satoshi Nakamoto, but rather the technology that was supposed to "replace" or "disrupt" the corrupt Banking system. Now Banks have started to use Satoshi's code against him, by creating their own "Blockchain" based coins.

If Satoshi created a new technology that could not be "pirated" by Banks and other financial institutions and if it was better than Bitcoin, then I would consider selling some of my coins to buy these new coins.  Wink

I would still keep some BTC, because it is the most widely used coin at the moment.  Wink

Created by Satoshi or not, if it is a better version than the current bitcoin client, then I will support it.

There's a chance that we'll understand some great fine tuning in the new coin settings only when it's already expensive.
If it's proven to be Satoshi (although the chance for such event is very very small), if he will make a new coin I'd probably put a way a couple of them, just to make sure I have my back covered. Then it depends how the ecosystem will adapt to the new coin, I may use it more or less than the actual Bitcoin.

you both earned yourself some merit! and 1 free MikeCoin
wait Kakmakr I have none left, IOU.

much <3 brothers.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1963
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This experiment was never about Satoshi Nakamoto, but rather the technology that was supposed to "replace" or "disrupt" the corrupt Banking system. Now Banks have started to use Satoshi's code against him, by creating their own "Blockchain" based coins.

If Satoshi created a new technology that could not be "pirated" by Banks and other financial institutions and if it was better than Bitcoin, then I would consider selling some of my coins to buy these new coins.  Wink

I would still keep some BTC, because it is the most widely used coin at the moment.  Wink
member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 30
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023
~~
If Satoshi returns with better technology, it will add to BTC "as it will receive quick acceptance" but that does not mean the need to cancel or stop dealing with bitcoin, something like Ubuntu or mint.


Personally, there will be no other technology that Satoshi will bring out that will be of a match to Bitcoin (Original Bitcoin). Remember someone claimed that, he was the Satoshi; and then fork Bitcoin without a good end, so, likewise if the Real Satoshi do, end in shackles. Lets understand that Satoshi created this technology for it to develop as time goes on, and also, remember that its an experiment and cannot be change from what it is to another new version so easily. If this happen, there will be a clear signal that the community is divided.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Created by Satoshi or not, if it is a better version than the current bitcoin client, then I will support it.

There's a chance that we'll understand some great fine tuning in the new coin settings only when it's already expensive.
If it's proven to be Satoshi (although the chance for such event is very very small), if he will make a new coin I'd probably put a way a couple of them, just to make sure I have my back covered. Then it depends how the ecosystem will adapt to the new coin, I may use it more or less than the actual Bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address  1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

First of all, I don't think the real Satoshi Nakamoto would ever do that. He (assuming that Satoshi is not a group of individuals) does not want to claim influence nor popularity that is he left just as Bitcoin is about to be known globally and I don't think he will be changing this character just for the sake of anything. Unlike many other cryptocurrency leaders of this generation, he is not very much motivated by greed but by that opportunity to contribute something that can make humanity much better.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1069
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address  1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

Created by Satoshi or not, if it is a better version than the current bitcoin client, then I will support it. But if it does not have anything better to offer, just the name Satoshi attached to it, then no. The only way is to move forward. If there is something better than bitcoin then the community should support it.
hero member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 574
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I think bitcoin 2.0 will be the next series of bitcoin with better technology. Bitcoin itself will integrate with the new system, so it will make the whole system will work better than before. We need to follow the system and integrate with the new system so it will fix the problem from bitcoin in a better way.
But I wonder if he really created bitcoin 2.0 since he does not appear to the public and he still hiding in the dark. I think that will change the whole cryptocurrency way into a better than now and maybe it will help and solve what the problem itself.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 265
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address  1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Nope,for what reason should i convert my Hard earned bitcoin to somethin*new?let me return the question would you use it?

I am contented on what bitcoin is doing and i have no reason to just abandoned this to jump on another

And besides we are now the owner of bitcoin and it’s not Satoshi
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
that is a very naive question because you still don't realize that those who started using bitcoin for reasons beyond fiat profit never did it because "Satoshi Nakamoto" made it! who is Satoshi anyways apart from an anonymous entity? every one of them did it because of what bitcoin is and what it offers them.

in other words there is no answer to your question because it depends on what this so called "bitcoin 2.0" is. if it really is good (better than bitcoin) then yeah everyone will use it. but if it is not then it  doesn't matter who creates it.
besides, anybody who uses the name Satoshi to create something called "bitcoin 2.0" is obviously not going to create anything half as good as bitcoin! they obviously would do it for monetary gains to scam people that is why they always use the name "bitcoin". take a look at how many projects have done it already!
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
Why will he, when he knows there is no need for it.

People have already developed Bitcoin 2.0, 3.0 and etc in the name of Satoshi and gave them different names, you know the fate of all of them  Grin

For me there is one Bitcoin and I am happy with it.



yah in the name of Satoshi, there is a difference between a Michael Jackson impersonator and a Michael Jackson.  That is not bitcoin2.0 that is sh*tcoin1.0 bitcoin clone edition.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
Firstly, what you mentioned would never happen since Satoshi is not dumb to sabotage Bitcoin by introducing a new version in this aspect. Didn't you observe the current state of the Bitcoin related forks op?

Bitcoin cash is the only successful fork which itself is mired in a bucket load of controversies.

It would not be a fork, well I mean it could be I guess but I don`t see the point of that.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
Bitcoin 2.0 has to offer something as unique as bitcoin offered to this world, otherwise why will people move on it when there are ethereum, monero, grincoin and others?
His/their name isn't a magic word to turn people blindly. Also that would be a very silly action, created bitcoin and hide identity, them created bitcoin 2.0 and came with identity? What was the reason of revealing it in second moment? It's clear, to use your name and manipulate people to follow you. A little "shock" that will be gone after couple days, that's all.

Well yah that is why it is called bitcoin2.0 or SatoshiCoin or whatever they want to call it. I mean they don`t have to reveal their identity or residence they just need people to know they are Satoshi with undeniable proof.

A persons face will not do that anyways. 
Pages:
Jump to: