Topic: If Satoshi came out with bitcoin2.0 would you use it? let`s say he used his keys - page 5. (Read 955 times)
April 30, 2019, 04:21:08 AM
Those who gather at the Club are only a small part of a fast-growing idealist group and profit seekers who work hastily on a new type of digital currency. Call them crypto 2.0. These coins must, like Bitcoin, allow direct payments between two parties without intermediary interference or government oversight. However, unlike the original cryptocurrency, it is stable enough to be used in everyday transactions.
April 30, 2019, 04:00:59 AM
yes, I would, just like we risks trying out for new altcoins we are surely gonna try bitcoin 2.0 too. maybe it will come with plenty of new features but that doesn't mean we are gonna leave the old bitcoin system.bitcoin was really unexpected from the start, no matter how well someone understands the inner workings of this coin they still need a lot of external skills to grab some handfull of digital coins.
April 30, 2019, 03:27:37 AM
As for me, there's no need for him to release Bitcoin 2.0 because Bitcoin is more than enough and is already playing a vital role in the community. I'm contented with Bitcoin and as bitcoin holders, we should just focus on its development and price increase. If Satoshi would release a new coin, I'm sure that it still needs a lot of time to progress and it couldn't surpass Bitcoin's achievement.
April 30, 2019, 03:02:28 AM
Firstly, what you mentioned would never happen since Satoshi is not dumb to sabotage Bitcoin by introducing a new version in this aspect. Didn't you observe the current state of the Bitcoin related forks op?
Bitcoin cash is the only successful fork which itself is mired in a bucket load of controversies.
Bitcoin cash is the only successful fork which itself is mired in a bucket load of controversies.
April 30, 2019, 02:38:08 AM
No, because if he did launch another bitcoin, that means his intention isn't purely to help the oppressed anymore but to make money off of his believers. I don't believe that he'd do it anyway, because if he would, he already had in the past prior to the 2017 ATH. I'm good with what bitcoin is right now and I'm happy with the benefits it offers me. If I want to play with other coins I would, and if it's one of Satoshi's, I'd trade, but I would not blindly follow.
(Let's just assume that Satoshi is a he.)
(Let's just assume that Satoshi is a he.)
April 30, 2019, 02:30:06 AM
Short answer: Yes, I will use it.
Satoshi or others, it does not depend on people, but the technology developed.
Most altcoins are shit-copies of BTC so it will not be better than it.
If Satoshi returns with better technology, it will add to BTC "as it will receive quick acceptance" but that does not mean the need to cancel or stop dealing with bitcoin, something like Ubuntu or mint.
Satoshi or others, it does not depend on people, but the technology developed.
Most altcoins are shit-copies of BTC so it will not be better than it.
If Satoshi returns with better technology, it will add to BTC "as it will receive quick acceptance" but that does not mean the need to cancel or stop dealing with bitcoin, something like Ubuntu or mint.
April 30, 2019, 02:26:04 AM
Bitcoin gained its value because it was community driven ,not because it was made by Satoshi, so having some soatoshi coming out with a bitcoin 2.0 does not change my choice of which bitcoin to follow. The current bitcoin software is the most secure block chain to date ,it is the most robost and decentralized.No such thing as bitcoin 2.0, anything not the bitcoin we already know is an altcoin.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
April 30, 2019, 02:25:44 AM
I won't, you know why? Satoshi is no longer the owner of bitcoin (he intentionally created the technology to evolve that way). We know he's the founder but gone are the days one individual have control over how a decentralized system is operated. Bitcoin have grown more than Satoshi and he/she/them knows that too. Him bringing out another bitcoin, bitcoin2.0 will just be considered as another wanna be bitcoin (shitcoin) by me even though he proves his identity through signing a signature message from his know address. This days nothing is impossible, hackers are capable of doing anything.
April 30, 2019, 02:19:51 AM
Why will he, when he knows there is no need for it.
People have already developed Bitcoin 2.0, 3.0 and etc in the name of Satoshi and gave them different names, you know the fate of all of them
For me there is one Bitcoin and I am happy with it.
People have already developed Bitcoin 2.0, 3.0 and etc in the name of Satoshi and gave them different names, you know the fate of all of them
For me there is one Bitcoin and I am happy with it.
April 30, 2019, 02:13:14 AM
Whatever might be the technology with the bitcoin 2.0, one that existed initially will hold the value. The second version will be the one derived from the first one. Some user have mentioned it comparing to the ethereum classic, still ethereum leads the market. Ethereum classic gained good support just because of ethereum. Same will happen with bitcoin 2.0 as well.
April 30, 2019, 01:57:41 AM
Bitcoin 2.0 will it be a migration from the current bitcoin version to a more advanced one, if the evidences are clear and having the same key with exchange rate of 1 to 1 value then I will use it. I know this is just a poll and just for fun because we have seen the results from all previous attempt to fork bitcoin and it aftermath result.
April 30, 2019, 01:49:23 AM
I believe there's a small faction in the community that has accepted that "Satoshi" has ALREADY come out with "Bitcoin 2.0". They call it,
Bitcoin Cash SV, Satoshi's Vision.
But deep inside they know it's stupid.
Bitcoin Cash SV, Satoshi's Vision.
But deep inside they know it's stupid.
April 30, 2019, 12:11:01 AM
If Satoshi came out with Bitcoin2.0 would you use it over Bitcoin current client, if he advised you to and let you exchange your current btc into it? let`s say he used his keys to 100% prove it is the real person or team.
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
signed on the forum and signed with 2-3 of the starting wallets and genesis address 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
Jump to: