Topic: Invest wisely - page 22. (Read 4813 times)
Well said....thorough research on any project before investing is Paramount. Ratings given ICO bench and co should not be enough reason to invest. Team, whitepaper, need for project development, etc should also be put in consideration before investing.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I also think that before you invest or start to participate in the bounty, you need to take the time and study the project and only then make a decisionYou're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
This is just hitting the nail in the head.. So many projects that are being introduced are turning out to be a waste time, and it is becoming very discouraging.. The team experience and even the partners is very vital for my option to say Yes or No to a project.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I also think that before you invest or start to participate in the bounty, you need to take the time and study the project and only then make a decision You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
True but there are too many ICOs to learn and research. All looking good especially for newbie like me. Well, I will learn by doing. This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I think people forget about research, most of people follow the hype about the project,this is why a lot of people loose their investments value remember make a research in every directions of the project before investing in the project.
Hello everybody. Invest in a company that has been tested by time, whose rating is verified by experienced professionals who has a finished product that runs social networks that has partner support. Here, in my opinion, the company's investment standards are required. All of these qualities are owned by Кonios.
Of course we should think twice before we invest into any ICO.
Since the beginning of this year, lots of ICOs failed and investors lost lots of hard earned money.
They have learnt from these experiences and become more cautious, which is good for crypto world.
Since the beginning of this year, lots of ICOs failed and investors lost lots of hard earned money.
They have learnt from these experiences and become more cautious, which is good for crypto world.
Oh please. There will always be people who trust everyone and are pitched headfirst into the deep end of hype without gathering at least minimum amount of information about hype projects. And scammers will always thrive on that silly gullible guys. It's life.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You are very right. That's why, it is very difficult to answer the permanent posts - how to find a good ICO, how to make sure that ICO is good and so on. Before investing time or money, we have a very good idea where to put in this resource.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Good point you have there! People now invest base on the hype on a particular ico without critically looking at the potentials in the project as well as its viability. Many projects nowadays are over hyped but they lack the potentials to deliver as expected of them.
Absolutely, sad thats therr are people just joining wihout knowing what really a good project is. Even a shit project have some investor and bounty hunters who promote. Yes we need to be work multiple times but working just to say we do our best. Dont depend on how many you are participating its okey to have less but all are legit and real great ico who really have plan and working product out there
I think that's what everybody is trying to do right now, because every project seems to promise something similar. There are some that we can easily distinguish, but unfortunately there are many shit that wrapped neatly, because the scammer also evolved.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I agree with what your stating because before investing my money on something, I make sure I believe and understand what I'm getting into. However, in the defense of those who are getting swayed by what others are saying, it cannot be ignored that one factor you need to consider would be the feedback from others. However, those "others" must be a legitimate and reliable source of information.
I think the best to is to invest wisely, I.e by understanding the trend of the platform
I always at first helped ratings sites icobench and icoratings. But they only help with the initial choice, then you need to study the information about the project yourself.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I can't agree with you more. We need to be more responsible for our money and make the choice of our investment. We need to be find the reliable evidence to make sure the coins are good for us to invest. That means we need to make the wise choice. You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
in my opinion, we must be careful to buy ico, because now ico project is very much, if the origin of your purchase can be fooled, buy ico who have a project and a team that has been experienced
that is really true, not only for the investor but also for the bounty hunters because it will only waste your time. you should really study thoroughly the project before going to invest in it. check the white paper and the developer and the team.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
True, learn first how is the team doing and not because of the websites and other materials that seems to be like that the project is very true and promising. There ico now that is very deceiving and afterwards we will discover that the project is a scam.
indeed invest wisely it is in need and very important. such as clever take steps in investing and using every opportunity that exists. not easy Panic and so forth.
Jump to: