Topic: Invest wisely - page 30. (Read 4813 times)
You're right mate. A whole lot of people have misinvested in series of wrong token projects because of ICO rating and all sought of things. Some of the ICO projects turn out to be scam. The recent one is the token call UCHIT. They even went to the extent that they put up fake picture as the picture of their CEO. One just has to do his finding very well before investing in any token that is yet to be listed on the major exchange.
It is true.Do you invest don't worry just think this time is perfect. if you think perfect and you will invest.But at present moment if you invest I think good work for you.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
you're right, unfortunately. Icobench I personally don't trust, too a good score was obscure projects. Don't follow the crowd. Its head on the shoulders should be. Information on how to evaluate the ICO at the moment is not enough.
Before handing over even a single penny; one must ensure that the receiver deserves. Most of the people here would be the persons who may have saved certain surplus funds with them earned by their hard work. So do not invest in some project because someone is doing so or some persons are advising to invest there. First of all study the project; read white paper; check the past experience of the team behind the project their goals for the current project. In case the team is unknown or new to the market and the project is also new then think twice before investing. If the project is already running; then check check results and what are the expansion plans.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
The whole strategy of unscrupulous developers is built on the greed of people. Trying to attract more investors, they make promises, which initially were practically impossible. Promising to get rich without much effort, they attract short-sighted and overly trusting investors. So as not to lose your savings you need to be very careful in choosing ICO. It is necessary to investigate and analyze the ICO market about what our colleagues have already written above.
Yeah you are right, what most people don't understand is that all these review sites are paid by the ICO teams to promote their ICOs. Most of the people in crypto market just invest based on the hype an ICO has which is very wrong. What you should look for is if the basic fundamentals of a coin are strong.
All the same, thanks to the hype, the price of tokens rises and you can sell them by gaining some profit. This is the main type of earnings on most iCO
Agreed. Despite the fact that people make contributions on the basis of excitement. But this is the main thing because of which the value of the coin grows sharply. It is true. The new marketing tactics for most ICO projects nowadays is to conduct airdrop to create hype for the project. And this creates a false hype and fomo.
Most of the ICOs had been in the red and not making extravagant profits like in the past. So everyone has to be more selective nowadays
Most of the ICOs had been in the red and not making extravagant profits like in the past. So everyone has to be more selective nowadays
Invest wisely, choose wisely and importantly be smart and researchable because this is the important thing you must have before investing to avoid scam. Some investors do not even educate themselves about the projects they buy. Maybe we should go through these times. But the problem is that some people will not survive here if their expectations are not even in line with reality.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
if I do have a lot of money, I will invest only coin bitcoin and eth only, because the coin is definitely clear, just waiting for the price of the coin down just bought.
now this price of all coin down, about what month can it rise again?
In the world of Cryptocurrency, there are indeed many sectors to succeed.
Starting from investments in ICO projects, the ICO project is a place for bounty hunters and investors to find tokens and profits.
If the ICO project is good and has good potential to develop then it will not be an investment or a Bounty program because it is one of the opportunities to benefit from Cryptocurrency.
Starting from investments in ICO projects, the ICO project is a place for bounty hunters and investors to find tokens and profits.
If the ICO project is good and has good potential to develop then it will not be an investment or a Bounty program because it is one of the opportunities to benefit from Cryptocurrency.
The problem is that the most of the people here investing their money without knowing what cryptocurrency or blockchain is. Or without searching or reading for them to have some knowledge about what they're into. They just think about the quick money. They don't think about the scams they might get into. Be wise, wiser rather.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
In my opinion rates are important to choose some projects to compare and then make some research on them, taking into consideration some important things like: whitepaper, team and etc. Scores are smth like filter among so many projects on the market. It is difficult to go through all of them, so we need to select based on something and scores are good tool. I am looking at IcoGuide scores, they seems to bee realistic.
I agree that we should study the project more carefully and what kind of team is behind it, so as not to get to the scammers.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It seems that we must understand, that not everyone who invests has access to get the full information about the project they are going to buy. Some may only follow referrals from social media. So before any regulations govern this issue, I think this kind of situation will continue to happen.
and if this is happening, then he needs to find out the news about the projects so he does not choose the wrong project and besides that, he doesn't just to join in any of project before he knows the details about the projects. I think he can find the information about the project in many ways and one of that way is from social media but he doesn't have to participate if he is not sure with the project.
There does not seem much we can do about this situation. Some investors do not even educate themselves about the projects they buy. Maybe we should go through these times. But the problem is that some people will not survive here if their expectations are not even in line with reality.
Looks like the current situation is pretty good. Some projects with regular ratings can get hardcap. This shows that investors are less dependent on a project's rating. But of course with the many new projects a bit more also become another problem. Everyone is trying to keep the project, and a really good project does not get the support it's supposed to.
It seems that we must understand, that not everyone who invests has access to get the full information about the project they are going to buy. Some may only follow referrals from social media. So before any regulations govern this issue, I think this kind of situation will continue to happen.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Ratings should not be the only criteria for investment, but it should be taken into considerations, as the rates often come from experts. For example I am looking at ww.icoguide.com rates.
I completely agree with you here. ICObench and others are clearly paid to rate some ICOs higher than others. Not to mention they are giving 4-5 star ratings on MANY projects, but there's no way these are all great investments.
Yes, sometimes people no longer care whether ICO already has a job project or not. What they care about is whether the tokens are traded or not or whether the volume is very high or not. This should not happen at all. 
I completely agree with you here. ICObench and others are clearly paid to rate some ICOs higher than others. Not to mention they are giving 4-5 star ratings on MANY projects, but there's no way these are all great investments.
Jump to: