I'd like to point out something many ppl sometimes forget . ALWAYS remember that we are a community and while the iodevteam is working and self funding and pursuing goals it is the ppl here in the community whether big or small to contribute as see fit. IF there is something someone notices wrong with a wallet on a half hack exchange please feel free contact them. If you want be added to shapeshift.io than feel free post a twitter link or email shapeshift. If you feel open bazaar is good exposure set it up. IF u feel dions is taking too long dump away. If you would like make a video a flyer a t-shirt a poster,banner, pin, hat do it. Bitcoinprbuzz is 600 to 1k per press release. Send some btc donate btc for it. Point is ppl in community can take the reigns n spread the word. Go to a crypto meet up and handout some brochures. That's how it works. U get what u put into it. This project is serious, it is harder to stay legit and professional than to run a pump n dump or ico for btc gain. Joel Richard Sam update ,answer questions, and are available more than any dev team I have seen in crypto and I think it's a bit ridiculous the amount of pushy neediness that often times goes on. Ioc is LONGTERM. There will be a time ioc hits 20cents 50 cents dollar 2 dollar and it maybe a month a year 2 years . Who cares.
pdf please 
Topic: I/O Coin - Ticker: IOC - Stealth Blockchain Ecosystem - Dions - Chameleon - page 94. (Read 719184 times)
April 19, 2016, 12:19:28 AM
April 18, 2016, 10:39:27 PM
Unproven ICO blockchain projects = 0
Unless these projects are attached to some hot air and the quick possible profit, nobody would care for them. In this space you will get plenty promoters to find someone to gas up, to the very highest levels, to find someone else to dump on. Hidden and Known devs are quick to dump a project to start up another ico for quick profit. They can spin up ico after ico and make it seem like what they have is GOD Sent and the next BITCOIN destroyer.
We are not in this business of Hype and quick hot air for pump. We are building a secure blockchain ecosystem with our own sacrifice and our own hard earn money. The entire dev team has paid for every single coin we own and that says allot. When you have ICO projects making coins out of thin air you tell me, what kind of commitment that is. Hard work and dedication is the only route we know. We will stick with it, for the foreseeable future, as richard mentioned above. We are here to build a real blockchain ecosystem. Our team has a combined 50 plus years of business and tech experience and we are confident of our success in the long run, no need to hype and or compare to anyone else.
Joel
April 18, 2016, 02:00:36 PM
Hi Simon,
You probably did not make your point clear then.
You are absolutely right about all those ICO's having the interest momentum. But you tell me what ICO's are successful in delivering great software and sustained a decent trade level above their ICO and are still around?
Probably of all ICO's the past 24 months (more then 100) one or two made some good stuff.
That means 98 just got a lot of money and the community in their necks all day long or are completely vanished.
So refering to hold an ICO to get some attention: We will pass on that for now.
Check this page: https://yobit.net/en/ico/ - a lot of nice ICO's where you could give your money to.
Do they all have that same interest momentum? No, others do have the momentum like Lysk because all those people "invested" want to earn a quick buck. Yes, they will tweet like crazy people because of their own financial interest. Wait what happens if they fail to deliver. It is already postponed a few times. Lets see where this ends or not.
We do absolutely everything to have the focus on us. Visiting the Fintech awards, give frequent updates, pay for everything ourselves, talk to investors, talk to businesses etc.
Our focus is to have the attention of investors and businesses because they will stick till the end and will provide a better momentum in the end. A long lasting relationship.
In that light selling IOC stuff on OpenBazaar is not the kind of thing that would attract these kind of people. We could better team up with OpenBazaar to connect to our chain and interconnect with each other. That is the help and ideas we need in case you want to give some more ideas.
An ICO would definitely give us some attention, but not the attention we want and not the attention we need. That is our opinion.
Cheers
Richard
You probably did not make your point clear then.
You are absolutely right about all those ICO's having the interest momentum. But you tell me what ICO's are successful in delivering great software and sustained a decent trade level above their ICO and are still around?
Probably of all ICO's the past 24 months (more then 100) one or two made some good stuff.
That means 98 just got a lot of money and the community in their necks all day long or are completely vanished.
So refering to hold an ICO to get some attention: We will pass on that for now.
Check this page: https://yobit.net/en/ico/ - a lot of nice ICO's where you could give your money to.
Do they all have that same interest momentum? No, others do have the momentum like Lysk because all those people "invested" want to earn a quick buck. Yes, they will tweet like crazy people because of their own financial interest. Wait what happens if they fail to deliver. It is already postponed a few times. Lets see where this ends or not.
We do absolutely everything to have the focus on us. Visiting the Fintech awards, give frequent updates, pay for everything ourselves, talk to investors, talk to businesses etc.
Our focus is to have the attention of investors and businesses because they will stick till the end and will provide a better momentum in the end. A long lasting relationship.
In that light selling IOC stuff on OpenBazaar is not the kind of thing that would attract these kind of people. We could better team up with OpenBazaar to connect to our chain and interconnect with each other. That is the help and ideas we need in case you want to give some more ideas.
An ICO would definitely give us some attention, but not the attention we want and not the attention we need. That is our opinion.
Cheers
Richard
April 18, 2016, 12:47:16 PM
Hi Simon,
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
[/quote]The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
Ok, maybe i did not make my point clear. Firstly, what the hell has Open Bazaar got to do with anything lol and i mentioned those other 2 ICO's because they are the most talked about right now and have had a ton of bitcoin investment.
SO i was thinking, IOC would benefit greatly from creating an ICO to speed developments up, because they are very slow, but hey, i only know(and the rest of the IOC community) only know the 10% you guy share with us.
Thats all i am saying. Not telling anyone what t do, merely thinking out loud.
Far from Nervous and i have more IOC now than i have ever had thanks to the dumpers. Sitting pretty right here.
PS: Happy to sell at 30k sats if someone wants 100k IOC or more in one go.
April 18, 2016, 10:52:07 AM
Lol. you are probably right but also understand what i mean ;-)
you get the picture.
Richard
you get the picture.
Richard
April 18, 2016, 09:01:26 AM
Hi Simon,
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
couldn't have said it better
[/quote]
Yea? And i think this is contradiction in terms:
"The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do." and
"We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that."
April 18, 2016, 08:55:16 AM
Hi Simon,
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
[/quote]The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
couldn't have said it better
April 18, 2016, 08:45:52 AM
Hi Simon,
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
[/quote]
The plans you know are just 10% of the plans we are working on. Not even close to what other projects currently doing or say they will do.
This is being worked on in the background. DIONS and Chameleon will only be a precedent for what is coming.
It seems like you are getting nervous somehow and sucked into new things like Lysk and Open Bazaar. I see some pattern repeating itself and sure hope we don't have to go down that road again. "you need to do this", "you need to do that", "others are doing better with an ICO", "you need to prove you are better".
Also i don't like the tone you are setting with "Will it be released before 2017?". What kind of question is that. You should know better.
Like i said: We are not going to compare dicks with other projects. Yes, we are the nice guys like you said in Slack.
I would prefer to call that "professional".
Let me be clear: we don't need to do anything. We follow our own path and release info when we feel it is of any importance to the community / project.
That is a big difference to projects paid by ICO's. Hundreds of people invested in any ICO want value for their money and rant on dev's when they don't deliver or the price is below ICO. Then the devs must answer to the ICO investors. Teams will get sucked into Scam accusations, mail rants etc. We will not answer to hundreds of people, but only to ourselves and possibly one or two external investors. Yes, we love our community, but it is not needed to tell us what to do.
The great majority is not saying that btw, but just to set an example.
If people are interested in the project and want to know specifics, please ask. Do not just say "what are the differences between you and ETH" for example.
We don't have all the details on all those projects and we cannot compare them or spend time on that. (if people want so, please do so) We can give answers on the questions you have.
People in Slack have seen that the team is very close to the community and questions are answered almost the same day.
Slack: www.iodigital.io/slack
Richard
[/quote]
April 18, 2016, 07:07:38 AM
I/O DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE APRIL 17th 2016
Ok folks, so this past week we were working on the wallet to fully poll the daemon for 'new' name status and provided the option to update. We are also making a NEW! upgrade to DIONS, with the addition of a new name functionality, to make it better and suit the wallet interface. We are changing the new name creation around to make it more unique, so the user can create a new name and choose one of his own public RSA keys to encrypt it with. That way the daemon can be polled by the wallet for 'pending' names and the user can see directly the plain text name but nobody else will, essentially creating an alias (Private Mode). The first update then simply uses the decrypted name using the user's key. This will make the wallet front end tracking of what names the user has pending and ready for update much easier and more robust. Will get this in this coming up week and then make the wallet changes to poll this info. We already implemented the basic mechanism for this in the back end as proof of concept and it works fine.
DIONS has to be very robust and in comparison to other propositions, we need to make our aliases system much better and more secure to sustain us for a long term, without major overhaul upgrades.
Lastly we want to Congratulate everyone that continues to stick with us throughout our development journey. We made some very important gains in relationships in the awards and conference. Allot of hard work in many fronts, not just on coding. On a side note, we are extremely proud of Richard our community manager for all his hard work. A special thank you to "CrazyC" Chris for his help on the final design and print of our brochures.
Thanks Everyone
I/O DIGITAL DEV TEAM
Thank you for the Update.
Any ETA on DioNS ? Will it be released before 2017? Is work being done on Chameleon also? Or is it "All Hands" on DioNS ?
You guys really need to make a ICO (as part of I/ODigital) this will help you to greatly speed things up, look at the money other ICO's are getting and most likely like , Lisk and Waves, they are just "short Term" coins with no real ambition.
Clearly I/OCoin has long, LONG term vision and people can invest into IOC knowing its a solid developments and tea and the bonus of this is that the IOC team can hire more people and speed things along, i fear you are in danger of being over taken by similar projects.
April 17, 2016, 09:42:03 PM
its nice to be apart of project where dev is very active. great work dev cheers.
April 17, 2016, 05:52:49 PM
IOC 500k sat at yobit, lol ;-)
looks like they brought price all the way up to .27777 btc. with the wallet closed for months, I'm wondering who's responsible for pumping it up like that.
if the 17 btc worth of volume is at a commission of .2% than to buy and sell yourself that much btc worth of ioc...would cost less than .07 btc...did i figure that correctly
April 17, 2016, 05:06:16 PM
IOC 500k sat at yobit, lol ;-)
April 17, 2016, 01:16:05 PM
I/O DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE APRIL 17th 2016
Ok folks, so this past week we were working on the wallet to fully poll the daemon for 'new' name status and provided the option to update. We are also making a NEW! upgrade to DIONS, with the addition of a new name functionality, to make it better and suit the wallet interface. We are changing the new name creation around to make it more unique, so the user can create a new name and choose one of his own public RSA keys to encrypt it with. That way the daemon can be polled by the wallet for 'pending' names and the user can see directly the plain text name but nobody else will, essentially creating an alias (Private Mode). The first update then simply uses the decrypted name using the user's key. This will make the wallet front end tracking of what names the user has pending and ready for update much easier and more robust. Will get this in this coming up week and then make the wallet changes to poll this info. We already implemented the basic mechanism for this in the back end as proof of concept and it works fine.
DIONS has to be very robust and in comparison to other propositions, we need to make our aliases system much better and more secure to sustain us for a long term, without major overhaul upgrades.
Lastly we want to Congratulate everyone that continues to stick with us throughout our development journey. We made some very important gains in relationships in the awards and conference. Allot of hard work in many fronts, not just on coding. On a side note, we are extremely proud of Richard our community manager for all his hard work. A special thank you to "CrazyC" Chris for his help on the final design and print of our brochures.
Thanks Everyone
I/O DIGITAL DEV TEAM
April 17, 2016, 10:46:12 AM
We just Won! #1 the Fintech Awards in the Blockchain Category.
Amazing Work big thanks to Richard for representing us all.
Amazing Work big thanks to Richard for representing us all.
congratulations team!!
very nice
April 17, 2016, 10:27:31 AM
looks like some market manipulation on yobit.
interesting as wallet (depsoits and withdrawals) on that exchange has been broken for months. Can't figure the reason?
interesting as wallet (depsoits and withdrawals) on that exchange has been broken for months. Can't figure the reason?
April 14, 2016, 10:23:18 PM
[IOC][ I/O Digital ] I/O Coin - Blokchain Ecosystem - DIONS - CHAMELEON
please fix title of thread.....
not sure if it speaks well of professionalism if we can't spell BLOCKCHAIN correctly
please fix title of thread.....
not sure if it speaks well of professionalism if we can't spell BLOCKCHAIN correctly
April 14, 2016, 06:01:28 PM
The best thing i learned is that even VC’s say that our approach on Chameleon is a real problem solver.
I would have to agree, Chameleon is ground breaking from my limited understanding by linking up technologies and using the ingredients too bake a cake.
I think it is recipe for success, this leads me into another question, I am sorry maybe the community can help, chameleon as the side chain could integrate a function of another block chain such as a smart contract from ethereum to register a asset from NXT or counterparty and use the storage from storj or maidsafe and have a document registered on factom. connecting everything together with a decentralized exchange.
I would have to agree, Chameleon is ground breaking from my limited understanding by linking up technologies and using the ingredients too bake a cake.
I think it is recipe for success, this leads me into another question, I am sorry maybe the community can help, chameleon as the side chain could integrate a function of another block chain such as a smart contract from ethereum to register a asset from NXT or counterparty and use the storage from storj or maidsafe and have a document registered on factom. connecting everything together with a decentralized exchange.
April 14, 2016, 02:05:55 PM
hey Guys,
back home from the Fintech 2016 award conference.
I attended very good sessions about Blockchain, Venture Capitalist investment panel, banking innovation and the keynote.
It was a very informative and exciting day.
Talked to a few Vc’s (actually got an investment inquiry in my mailbox today), banks, businesses and got a lot of inside and background info.
Im going to discuss that with the team initially and in the next coming days maybe elaborate some more what i learned.
The best thing i learned is that even VC’s say that our approach on Chameleon is a real problem solver. They see all sorts of Blockchains and forks spinning up and nobody is working together or helping each other with the technology. When i explained our plans with Chameleon and being that kind of Blockchain middleman that interacts with sidechains and blockchains he immediately wanted my business card.
So a very nice day and learned a lot. Especially learned that Amterdam is an expensive parking area… had to pay $95 for a day parking… lol. Thanks for all the votes and next year we will be on the finals and win the judges award, im sure.
THANKS!
Richard
back home from the Fintech 2016 award conference.
I attended very good sessions about Blockchain, Venture Capitalist investment panel, banking innovation and the keynote.
It was a very informative and exciting day.
Talked to a few Vc’s (actually got an investment inquiry in my mailbox today), banks, businesses and got a lot of inside and background info.
Im going to discuss that with the team initially and in the next coming days maybe elaborate some more what i learned.
The best thing i learned is that even VC’s say that our approach on Chameleon is a real problem solver. They see all sorts of Blockchains and forks spinning up and nobody is working together or helping each other with the technology. When i explained our plans with Chameleon and being that kind of Blockchain middleman that interacts with sidechains and blockchains he immediately wanted my business card.
So a very nice day and learned a lot. Especially learned that Amterdam is an expensive parking area… had to pay $95 for a day parking… lol. Thanks for all the votes and next year we will be on the finals and win the judges award, im sure.
THANKS!
Richard
April 14, 2016, 01:34:19 PM
will the award make IOC price up to moon?
When the whales wanna pump it will, I'd perfer a natural growth instead of a manupulated pump. I think the news was already priced in when they announced they won a free ticket to the event.
April 14, 2016, 12:10:21 PM
will the award make IOC price up to moon?
When the whales wanna pump it will, I'd perfer a natural growth instead of a manupulated pump. I think the news was already priced in when they announced they won a free ticket to the event.
Jump to: