IOTA=SCAM
so fuckin simple, just watch and learn at their moderated forum.
Now Id say its not a real scam, its just incompetence. The scam is an opportunity, not originally planned for.
IoT is very attractive, its an enterprise buzzword, so of course it attracts real people with real good skills, but the founders and leaders, are just incompetent, both technically and socially obviously, and are delivering vapor, "almost-good" "we will have it ready soon" "from day 1 we knew we have to build asics and sell that duh".
The train is in full steam ahead, the crash wont be spectacular, good parts will fall out of IOTA. But it wont be the one and only machine economy infrastructure or anything like that at all.
you seem to be better than every genius in the iota-team
Even if I cannot paint like Picasso, I can still tell that your painting looks like shit and Picassos doesnt.
Even you should be able to see Iota for what it is, if you had not invested in it and now your critical-thinking is malfunctioning. You just want it to happen you just want it to work. You just want the damn money. And you and I both know, IoT micro-transactions market exists, corporations are dying for it even today, they want it. They want to sell their sensors data in automated fashion.
Look at it from a different perspective, if you are developer of IoT applications, from all the developer platforms out there, and all the chips, how many support the non-existent Jinn-machine/power-hungry ASIC? How many chips today need a power-hungry ASIC, extra-chip integrated on a micro-controller, in order to "broadcast txs to other nodes" for anyway not receiving any protection? I am telling you, 0, zero, none. You do not need it, in fact it is an extra cost, both in integrating it with micro controllers, and various IoT platforms, maintaining it, and in your application - all for what? "Zero-fee transactions"? For not having any more protection of your "IoT nodes" txs than SSL/TLS already today offers if you anyway talk to a full node under your trust.
Byteball does it better, and it does it much better. The fees are minuscule to what you can do, if you have 1Gigabytes, you can do 826 000 txs, and if you dont want your IoT device to "run out of balance to send txs", a declarative smart contract away puts the fee of 580 bytes on the buyer of your sensor-data.
That is all it takes, a declarative smart contract in Byteball, a very light wallet, put 600bytes on all your IoT devices, and sell their data at market prices. Buyer would pay 600bytes (tx fee) plus your set amount to buy say weather or such data. When you receive it, your IoT devices give that. Byteball also supports Oracles so all this can be done decentralized. If you dont want the very light wallet on IoT device (to develop it now), or to put any bytes on each device, you can use already made HTTPS API in all IoT development platforms and talk to your full node wallet. It cant get any simpler than this.
But anyway, good luck with it all.
BB doesn't aim for the IoT. easy. It's human applications, value shifting between two people. IOTAs field is different. Why is this even discussed?
Concerning your picasso:
I'm in IOTA for ~one year now. I studied the tech, the people, the everyday development, which is transparent btw. There are flaws, and everyone would lie if he told otherwise, but that's the process of development.
But up till now, I never saw anyone lying on purpose, no one was trying to hype IOTA and for the most time, we were told to stop hyping as IOTA wasn't interested in cryptoland but in real world application and adoption.
So where are issues with credibility here? I see none, and I doubt you can judge anyone, because you're not a real part of that community.
concerning your asic-example:
they will use IOTA nonetheless because some things can't be done without it. ever heard about winternitz otss?
the ternary system? monte carlo random walk?
too many advantages NOT to use it.
And once, JINN are built in a higher number, they get cheaper, the common circle of industrial processes.
so, it can be done simpler with https api, but a quantum computer will take control in 0.0001 s. not to forget all advantages of a tangle as such are gone. like decentralization etc.
concerning your fees: they disrupt nanopayments as such. you cannot buy sensordata for prices + fees equal to your bytes used because you would generated a GIGANTIC amount of fees. this thought is no fucking rocketscience, this is kindergarten.
and last but not least: if you really like byteball but dislike IOTA, why would you, a person whos a self-appointed expert in cryptos, waste your precious time on discrediting IOTA? Do you discredit komodo, ethereum, dogecoin, fucking potcoin or any other asset?
why not investing, and caring about life, like drinking beer, eating icecream and swinging your balls?
you LIKE to discredit IOTA because you have personal, emotional interest in harming it, because you were banned by David for trolling and for flaming without proper reasons. I see no value in that. Not even for your own sake. my life is more important than wasting time on such a worthless bullshit like these conversations here. srsly, I'm not going to elaborate any further on bullshit like this.