Topic: IOTA - Unmoderated thread - page 2. (Read 70768 times)
IOTA is super strong, beyond my imagination, it makes so many ppl rich. Wonderful project.
this team is good and they are doing great job. i trust to IOTA and HODL.
Why is IOTA only traded on Bitfinex and none of the other exchanges?
"I am sure you have not a single Iota"
Heh Heh... in this case you are correct. It's XEM I'm on about. Sorry about that. I'll get me coat!
Heh Heh... in this case you are correct. It's XEM I'm on about. Sorry about that. I'll get me coat!
Can anyone tell me why Bitrex have a 15 IOTA transaction fee?
How much should an IOTA transaction fee cost?
How much should an IOTA transaction fee cost?
The only Exchange with Iota is Bitfinex and not Bittrex. So you dont know nothing about Iota. I am sure you have not a single Iota.
Can anyone tell me why Bitrex have a 15 IOTA transaction fee?
How much should an IOTA transaction fee cost?
How much should an IOTA transaction fee cost?
More broken promises 
nxt3?
nxt3?
I'll send you a personal invite if I do that, don't worry.
Everytime i forget that youtube url I return here so that you can repost it. I am awaiting episode 2 that you promised.
I found a much more interesting scenario, sorry.
More broken promises
nxt3?
Everytime i forget that youtube url I return here so that you can repost it. I am awaiting episode 2 that you promised.
I found a much more interesting scenario, sorry.
The tech side of iota being poor is secondary to the fact it was a narrowly distributed.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
Every time you return to this topic I recall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM36ED544iE&feature=youtu.be and every time I enjoy it like seeing for the first time.
Everytime i forget that youtube url I return here so that you can repost it. I am awaiting episode 2 that you promised.
"In 2017, leaving your crypto algorithm vulnerable to differential cryptanalysis is a rookie mistake. It says that no one of any calibre analyzed their system, and that the odds that their fix makes the system secure is low".
This is addressed in https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Come-from-Beyond/63c97a697baf2a657bdddd9bdc6be05d/raw/e01bb6aae47a0207edaeb3e1fbfbf347b2ee3c2d/CFB%27s%2520response%2520to%2520Neha%2520Narula%27s%2520blogpost , just use CTRL+F.
In other words: You ran out of arguments and decided to use appeal to authority fallacy.
Your response to the revealed retardation is childish whimpering.
Beyond embarrassing and pathetic.
The tech side of iota being poor is secondary to the fact it was a narrowly distributed.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
Every time you return to this topic I recall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM36ED544iE&feature=youtu.be and every time I enjoy it like seeing for the first time.
The tech side of iota being poor is secondary to the fact it was a narrowly distributed.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.
You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.
Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.
Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.
I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.
"In 2017, leaving your crypto algorithm vulnerable to differential cryptanalysis is a rookie mistake. It says that no one of any calibre analyzed their system, and that the odds that their fix makes the system secure is low".
This is addressed in https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Come-from-Beyond/63c97a697baf2a657bdddd9bdc6be05d/raw/e01bb6aae47a0207edaeb3e1fbfbf347b2ee3c2d/CFB%27s%2520response%2520to%2520Neha%2520Narula%27s%2520blogpost , just use CTRL+F.
In other words: You ran out of arguments and decided to use appeal to authority fallacy.
"In 2017, leaving your crypto algorithm vulnerable to differential cryptanalysis is a rookie mistake. It says that no one of any calibre analyzed their system, and that the odds that their fix makes the system secure is low".
You are a rookie, and should gtfo of crypto.
My call back in february was correct, your own hash function was not even worthy of my time to analyze, just like many others of any calibre react upon seeing it.
Can not be taken seriously
I dont really care about your motivations and am not your psychatrist.
IOTA like many other attempted cryptocurrencies is a scam at worst, childish incompetence at best.
You are a rookie, and should gtfo of crypto.
My call back in february was correct, your own hash function was not even worthy of my time to analyze, just like many others of any calibre react upon seeing it.
Can not be taken seriously
I dont really care about your motivations and am not your psychatrist.
IOTA like many other attempted cryptocurrencies is a scam at worst, childish incompetence at best.
go fuck vitalik. he didn't make rookie childish mistakes... oh wait
I see you prefer algos with backdoors implemented by NSA
"In 2017, leaving your crypto algorithm vulnerable to differential cryptanalysis is a rookie mistake. It says that no one of any calibre analyzed their system, and that the odds that their fix makes the system secure is low".
You are a rookie, and should gtfo of crypto.
My call back in february was correct, your own hash function was not even worthy of my time to analyze, just like many others of any calibre react upon seeing it.
Can not be taken seriously
I dont really care about your motivations and am not your psychatrist.
IOTA like many other attempted cryptocurrencies is a scam at worst, childish incompetence at best.
You are a rookie, and should gtfo of crypto.
My call back in february was correct, your own hash function was not even worthy of my time to analyze, just like many others of any calibre react upon seeing it.
Can not be taken seriously
I dont really care about your motivations and am not your psychatrist.
IOTA like many other attempted cryptocurrencies is a scam at worst, childish incompetence at best.
You, and your followers, got your money and increased ego.
Heh, ok. Do you know, by the way, that people judge by their own personality?
Not lucky, just experienced scammer.
And what is the goal of this "scam"?
Rookie.
Not lucky, just experienced scammer.
And what is the goal of this "scam"?
Bringing Tupac back to life
Not lucky, just experienced scammer.
And what is the goal of this "scam"?
Jump to: