After so much dilema on whether to hold IPL this year or not there are indication that it might get postponed indefinitely. Just read an article on one of the news portal where BCCI president Sourav Ganguly has said "When life is at standstill, where does sport have a future’: BCCI President Sourav Ganguly on holding IPL 2020"
A clear picture will be available on Monday which is 13 th of April.
Source
Topic: IPL Mutual Pool Discussion. - page 5. (Read 1976 times)
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
COVID-19 stats from worldmeters.info/coronavirus. New to creating memes 
Looks like I suck at editing.
Nice one. It's the most trending subject in centuries so no wonder. By the way, not your fault, I guess I need an eye specialist. I really need to check my eyes. Sometimes I do not have clear vision. Looks like I suck at editing.
What do you have in the right column? It's too small for me to see even when I zoom I do not see anything. I must see a doctor LOL
COVID-19 stats from worldmeters.info/coronavirus. New to creating memes Looks like I suck at editing. Didn't check myself before posting. Will try to make it better for you after a few mins. legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Btw, our situation right now in a meme 
What do you have in the right column? It's too small for me to see even when I zoom I do not see anything. I must see a doctor LOL
I have heard of Bet365 in my college days but never joined any sites as I believe gambling is illegal in India (not sure though). Only in 2017, I started gambling online.
Btw, our situation right now in a meme
Edit: I think I fixed it for you Royse. Hope it's readable now.
Btw, our situation right now in a meme
Edit: I think I fixed it for you Royse. Hope it's readable now.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
These fiat based bookies are not safe too because they know your identity and in case they are being caught, the authorities can reach to you.
I only support crypto sportsbooks only because of no KYC. The only disadvantage is that the there are very few crypto based bookies and most of them are fiat based only.
If you are living in a country where gambling is legal then you are really fine and nothing to be worried but if your authority made it illegal then you will be in trouble of course. I only support crypto sportsbooks only because of no KYC. The only disadvantage is that the there are very few crypto based bookies and most of them are fiat based only.
Yeah, KYC is definite turn off for me.
Any fiat based bookies will ask for KYC. This is standard procedure when dealing with cross boarder payments. Since I got introduced with cyrpto bookies, I left those platforms for this reason.These fiat based bookies are not safe too because they know your identity and in case they are being caught, the authorities can reach to you.
I only support crypto sportsbooks only because of no KYC. The only disadvantage is that the there are very few crypto based bookies and most of them are fiat based only.
Never tried it, will check out once situation gets better. Although i like crypto betting more.
I think those of us who are gambling from long long time we all used bet365 more or less. There was a time I used stay logged in in their site most of my times LOLIt's the biggest in the online industry. You will have to do the KYC by the way.
@Royse777 I too visited this site in my early days of online gambling as back then I wasn’t aware of crypto gambling, but I didn’t make a account out there as my local bookie was giving me better odds lol. Further I’m glad that I didn’t make a account out there as I hate getting KYC done especially on a gambling site, and also I’m glad that many crypto casinos don’t subject us to do KYC.
Yeah, KYC is definite turn off for me.
Any fiat based bookies will ask for KYC. This is standard procedure when dealing with cross boarder payments. Since I got introduced with cyrpto bookies, I left those platforms for this reason.Never tried it, will check out once situation gets better. Although i like crypto betting more.
I think those of us who are gambling from long long time we all used bet365 more or less. There was a time I used stay logged in in their site most of my times LOLIt's the biggest in the online industry. You will have to do the KYC by the way.
@Royse777 I too visited this site in my early days of online gambling as back then I wasn’t aware of crypto gambling, but I didn’t make a account out there as my local bookie was giving me better odds lol. Further I’m glad that I didn’t make a account out there as I hate getting KYC done especially on a gambling site, and also I’m glad that many crypto casinos don’t subject us to do KYC.
Yeah, KYC is definite turn off for me.
Any fiat based bookies will ask for KYC. This is standard procedure when dealing with cross boarder payments. Since I got introduced with cyrpto bookies, I left those platforms for this reason.legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Yeah, KYC is definite turn off for me.
Any fiat based bookies will ask for KYC. This is standard procedure when dealing with cross boarder payments. Since I got introduced with cyrpto bookies, I left those platforms for this reason. Players can always migrates to other state, they do all the time and its working quite well for many players.
I am in favor of extra teams playing in any tournaments, be it IPL ( even WC). I would like to see one team from northeast too.
I am in favor of extra teams playing in any tournaments, be it IPL ( even WC). I would like to see one team from northeast too.
I don't want the smaller states to be dominated by players who are not from their ethnic background. For example, I have seen teams such as Meghalaya and Chandigarh, with hardly 2-3 native players in their playing XI. This may have a negative impact on the growth of cricket in these states. Do these teams even deserve a chance to play in the Ranji Trophy? Chandigarh isn't even a state. It is a Union Territory composed of half-part of a city.
BTW, I would love to have one team from the NE in the IPL. But the problem is that there are very few recognized players from that region. Assam and Tripura have been playing Ranji Trophy for many decades now, but till date very few of the players have caught the attention of the national selectors. Other teams such as Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur have started playing very recently.
Its not perfect world so we can't have all. We just have to concentrate on pros and keep working on cons, that's the only way to move forward IMO. More investment in Seven sisters can do magic.
It's the biggest in the online industry. You will have to do the KYC by the way.
Yeah, KYC is definite turn off for me. legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Never tried it, will check out once situation gets better. Although i like crypto betting more.
I think those of us who are gambling from long long time we all used bet365 more or less. There was a time I used stay logged in in their site most of my times LOLIt's the biggest in the online industry. You will have to do the KYC by the way.
Players can always migrates to other state, they do all the time and its working quite well for many players.
I am in favor of extra teams playing in any tournaments, be it IPL ( even WC). I would like to see one team from northeast too.
I am in favor of extra teams playing in any tournaments, be it IPL ( even WC). I would like to see one team from northeast too.
I don't want the smaller states to be dominated by players who are not from their ethnic background. For example, I have seen teams such as Meghalaya and Chandigarh, with hardly 2-3 native players in their playing XI. This may have a negative impact on the growth of cricket in these states. Do these teams even deserve a chance to play in the Ranji Trophy? Chandigarh isn't even a state. It is a Union Territory composed of half-part of a city.
BTW, I would love to have one team from the NE in the IPL. But the problem is that there are very few recognized players from that region. Assam and Tripura have been playing Ranji Trophy for many decades now, but till date very few of the players have caught the attention of the national selectors. Other teams such as Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur have started playing very recently.
~snip~
Hmm.. well.. let them come up with the contract system. But then, there should not be any reduction in the match fees for the players. But the current domestic system needs a revamp. For example, Uttar Pradesh (with a population of 250 million) may be having 14-15 contract players and at the same time states such as Sikkim and Chandigarh (with population less than 1 million) may have similar numbers with the same salary band. It is going to be unfair to emerging cricketers in larger states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
BTW, I would like the IPL to be expanded to 10 teams. Right now, the teams are concentrated in South and West of India, with the Central and Eastern parts scantly represented. I would like one additional team from UP/Bihar and one more from Madhya Pradesh or Orrissa.
Players can always migrates to other state, they do all the time and its working quite well for many players.
I am in favor of extra teams playing in any tournaments, be it IPL ( even WC). I would like to see one team from northeast too.
Not going to deny that nepotism and bias doesn't play any role in domestic cricket as this is harsh reality but i feel that contract based system can help players for simple reason - Financial stability - with this players can concentrate on 4 days cricket instead of IPL gigs, BCCI should also introduce grade system in Domestic level too similar to national team (Top grade players should receive big contract)
Hmm.. well.. let them come up with the contract system. But then, there should not be any reduction in the match fees for the players. But the current domestic system needs a revamp. For example, Uttar Pradesh (with a population of 250 million) may be having 14-15 contract players and at the same time states such as Sikkim and Chandigarh (with population less than 1 million) may have similar numbers with the same salary band. It is going to be unfair to emerging cricketers in larger states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
BTW, I would like the IPL to be expanded to 10 teams. Right now, the teams are concentrated in South and West of India, with the Central and Eastern parts scantly represented. I would like one additional team from UP/Bihar and one more from Madhya Pradesh or Orrissa.
Where in sportsbet? Can't find the section... Cricket section seems empty to me or i am missing something here?
Bitcoin featured bookies are not always cricket friendly. You can try bet365. As far as I know they are the biggest but you will have to deal with fiat money.BCCI might introduce Contract for domestic players too.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/monetary-boost-domestic-players-to-get-contracts/story-HkYlVBwGauapKIxkXGqR9H.html
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/monetary-boost-domestic-players-to-get-contracts/story-HkYlVBwGauapKIxkXGqR9H.html
I am not going to support this move. For the national team, it is OK. For domestic teams the team selection is not being done in a transparent manner and there is a lot of bias and nepotism. So in the end we'll be having sub-standard players getting the contract (at the expense of the good players) and they may play only a handful of matches during the entire season. I would rather go for the current system, where the salary is decided based on the number of matches played.
Not going to deny that nepotism and bias doesn't play any role in domestic cricket as this is harsh reality but i feel that contract based system can help players for simple reason - Financial stability - with this players can concentrate on 4 days cricket instead of IPL gigs, BCCI should also introduce grade system in Domestic level too similar to national team (Top grade players should receive big contract)
BCCI might introduce Contract for domestic players too.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/monetary-boost-domestic-players-to-get-contracts/story-HkYlVBwGauapKIxkXGqR9H.html
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/monetary-boost-domestic-players-to-get-contracts/story-HkYlVBwGauapKIxkXGqR9H.html
I am not going to support this move. For the national team, it is OK. For domestic teams the team selection is not being done in a transparent manner and there is a lot of bias and nepotism. So in the end we'll be having sub-standard players getting the contract (at the expense of the good players) and they may play only a handful of matches during the entire season. I would rather go for the current system, where the salary is decided based on the number of matches played.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Where in sportsbet? Can't find the section... Cricket section seems empty to me or i am missing something here?
Bitcoin featured bookies are not always cricket friendly. You can try bet365. As far as I know they are the biggest but you will have to deal with fiat money. To tell you truth i also do not know how the algorithm will work at the back ground. Anyone here betting on sportsbet on this virtual IPL matches can better share the experience with us. I was excited to get the email about this from sportsbet but look like it will not be successfully among the gamblers.
I am also waiting for someone to verify how this virtual IPL will match up and how the algorithm plays out, it is an experiment by them and there is no way to understand how they have set the algorithm but the house edge they will be having will favor them and it might depend upon the number of bets they receive. Looks like a lottery but with better odds to win 
. In short BCCI pay almost 10k professional cricketers including retired cricketers.
As far as I know, contracts are not offered to domestic players. Their earnings mostly composes of match fees. But at the end of every season, the BCCI pays them a fixed amount (surplus from the budget). These are the match fees for domestic players:
4 day matches (Ranji Trophy): ₹160,000 per match
ODI and T20 matches: ₹40,000 per match
U-19 and U-16 ODIs: ₹12,000 per match
U-23 ODIs: ₹40,000 per match
I was not objecting per se.. But was backing your statement by giving lump sum numbers of players who are solely dependent on BCCI.
About match fees of domestic players, guess its based on experience (old-new) right now.
This article is good
https://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/indian-domestic-cricket-salary-increased-enough
BCCI might introduce Contract for domestic players too.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/monetary-boost-domestic-players-to-get-contracts/story-HkYlVBwGauapKIxkXGqR9H.html
Jump to: