Topic: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? - page 21. (Read 102789 times)

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Real democracy can't exist because it is a power vacuum
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Tue, May 13, 2014 9:43 pm
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/05/13/the-death-of-representative-government-the-real-conspiracy-crisis-in-democracy/

It is a positive step (but unsatisfying) to see that Martin Armstrong has
dropped the illogical CIA plot red-herring, strawman argument (for now, we
he bring it back again?).

Now he reverts to his original reasoning displayed on his blog before the
Ukraine situation came into being.

Note I have read virtually EVERYTHING Armstrong has written which is
available on the internet.

Essentially Armstrong believes that the only possible solution for mankind
to avoid the repeating corruption of political structure throughout human
history, is term limits for politicians.

Armstrong's thesis is that politicians' vested interests become ingrained
if they are allowed to stay in office too long (Btw, an anti-dynasty law
is proposed now in the Philippines where I am).

I don't understand why Martin Armstrong can't grasp the point of Mancur
Olson's book The Logic Of Collective Action, which explains that voting
people into office creates a power vacuum wherein those who win are those
who promise the most to everyone. In other words, it hands away the
top-down control and power to privatize the gains from profits of banking
(and other corruptions) and socialize the costs of defaults from these
corrupt activities.

I've sent the following link to Armstrong numerous times, I guess he
hasn't taken the time to read it carefully. The following was written by
Eric Raymond, the progenitor of the open source movement and who is known
to have an IQ in the 150 to 170 range.

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984
(Some Iron Laws of Political Economics)

Creating some constitution or law to create term terms will not eliminate
the power vacuum, because the people who the term limits apply to are the
ones who are voting on the laws of the land. Even if they don't create a
law to absolve the term limits (one possibility), they can use their
influence while in office to gain employment after they leave office with
those corporations and entities which are benefiting from "the top-down
control and power to privatize the gains from profits of banking (and
other corruptions) and socialize the costs of defaults from these corrupt
activities.".

Thus creating a round-robin revolving door for political office
accomplishes nothing against the power vacuum of political top down control.

Even if we had the people vote directly on each and every action of the
government, the people could still be manipulated by mass media as they
are today. And because people are easily divided on petty issues, they are
easy to divide-and-conquer politically.

I long ago concluded there is no solution to politics. Martin sees that it
has been this way throughout human history, yet he thinks he is going to
lead some sudden change to the way it has always been? DELUSION! That is a
first stage of insanity! The power vacuum of political economics is a
natural effect. It can't be changed, because it is nature.

Come on Martin, come back to your senses. Get a grip on reality. You are
not God. Even the Bible explains this can't be changed in 1 Samuel 8. The
solution presented in the Bible is that those who believe are "not one of
this world" and should only answer to one King and not be concerned with
what happens in this flesh life.

Armstrong is correct that a Benevolent Dictator such as Caesar can provide
a brief respite from the power vacuum, but as Rome proved this is never
sustainable and the ill effects of the power vacuum re-emerge.

Armstrong is correct that the problem "is government" (specifically the
power vacuum) but he is incorrect to believe this can be changed.

There is only one change that has ever worked longer-term in the history
of the world. And that is for oppressed people to escape to a new frontier
wherein the government is small. This works until those people become
numerous and society becomes well-established, then the government grows
large again and the ill effects emerge.

Unfortunately now on earth, there is no more place for physical frontier,
because technology has shrunk the world. Even if you try to go hide in the
mountains between Argentina and Chile, there are roaming rangers who will
hunt you down. The U.S.A. even has satellites which can read the VIN
number plate on the dashboard of your car and identify your face from
outer space!

In the past at least we had physical cash (or gold/silver) to transact
with anonymously (out of view of the government) during oppressive times,
but now commerce is mostly electronic so tangible cash would mean a
cataclysmic implosion of the velocity-of-money (because it can't be
exchanged electronically), which is precisely what has been happening
since the blowup of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article45235.html



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantity_theory_of_money

M × V = P × Q ≈ nominal GDP


So now we come full circle to the only frontier remaining on earth which
has any chance of providing a solution to the current global cataclysm
ahead.

I described in great detail how the world is moving away from labor to a
knowledge age. One must read the following linked threads and understand
that labor could be financed and top-down controlled (c.f. the Theory of
the Firm), but knowledge is different especially now we have the means to
self-publish (internet) and self-produce (3D printers) our knowledge. At
the thread below I successfully debated Eric Raymond:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6065144

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6078778


The only frontier remaining is for us to move to a knowledge economy where
most commerce is hidden from the government (the power vacuum of
democracy) with anonymous crypto-currency.

The old labor-intensive industrial world is dying. Those bankster elite
are consolidating their economies-of-scale now with their geopolitical war
games and austerity programs driving revolutions, because IT IS JUST TIME.
What time is it? It is the end of their paradigm.

Finance will die. Because knowledge production no longer needs stored
capital.

This is a epochal shift and Armstrong is blinded. He can only see the old
world and old world non-solutions and plays right into the hand of the
elite's consolidation of power.

Whereas, the other side of the new technology is the birth of the
Knowledge Age and the death of the Industrial Age.

Is Martin too old to have an epiphany?

Well I don't have more time to convince him. I have real work to do on
doing my role to make this Knowledge Age come to fruition as fast as
possible.

What is the solution for Ukraine? It is the same as the solution for
people all over the world. Learn to do knowledge work in your home. Hide
away from the chaos outside. Let the elite consolidate their power.
Meanwhile adopt anonymous crypto-currency and profit from your knowledge
work. Soon the old world will be bankrupted as we race forward into
prosperity.

Epochal shift. Can Martin open his eyes to what TIME IT IS?

Mad max ahead...

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article45235.html



Quantity Theory of Money

M × V = P × Q ≈ nominal GDP

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Adult version of what happened in Ukraine
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Tue, May 13, 2014 5:57 am
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compare Armstrong's naive 5 year old level of analysis of the Ukrainian
events, to an adult analysis wherein the USA and EU were promoting Ukraine
to join the EU (probably aiding and abetting the revolutionaries behind
the scenes either directly or by indirect actions) and so Putin planned
out strategy to retain Ukraine. And the EU and USA stand back and let
Putin bankrupt himself over the next 10 year occupation, which is much
more efficient than starting World War 3. Whereas infantile analysis of
Armstrong says Europe decided not to start World War 3 because U.S.A. is
involved in Ukraine.

By bankrupting Putin in Ukraine, they will further force his hand to need
to create wider conflict, which will provide a distraction to blame the
Sovereign Global Debt Collapse on.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article45471.html

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Education for Armstrong on Ukraine and globalist geopolitics
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Tue, May 13, 2014 5:31 am
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article45455.html

Elites Want War. Front Man Obama Pushing Hard

The modus operandi of the elites is to create chaos, preferably in the
form of [profitable for them] war. Their purpose is to create major
headaches for governments and people. The next step is to “offer
solutions” to end the chaos. Without fail, the solutions always favor the
elite who gain more control as part of the cost for the rescue.

Why war? A simple diversion used to cover the total insolvency of the
entire Western banking system and the failure of all fiat currencies. The
only solution will be financial destruction, and major economic life
disruptions, especially in the ill-prepared United States. Previews of
what is in store for the United States are found in Greece, Cyprus,
Ireland, Venezuela, Argentina. The list grows.

There is only one head of state pushing for war against Russia, using
Ukraine as a pawn, and that is the elite front-man, Barack Obama. What
business does he have instigating chaos in that part of the world? None,
quite simply, yet he leads the charge.

Are the citizens of the United States urging him on? No. What about the
Europeans who transact billions of dollars in business with Russia, depend
upon Russia for 20% to 35% to supply their natural gas needs? Are
individual European states urging him on? No. Too much at risk, and
European leaders do not want to bear the consequences of yet more
sanctions that can end up hurting them more than hurting Russia.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was in Washington this weekend, giving the
appearance of being supportive of Obama but not offing it, directly. Ms
Merkel may soon be saying auf weidersehen to her job within another year.
If the German people are foolish enough to let the head Frau help decimate
the German economy, through risking hundreds of thousands of jobs, risking
future contracts between major German corporations and Russia, then like
the docile Americans, the Germans will only have themselves to blame.

If European states are opposed to more sanctions that will ending harming
them, then Obama has no other support, as he supports an illegal coup
d’etat, the overtaking of an elected government, and blames Putin for
breaking rules. Well, there is that unelected, non-representative group,
the IMF, which is in Obama’s hypocritical corner. The IMF promised Ukraine
$17 billion in tranched loans, with one small catch in the not so fine
print: Ukraine, you must go to war against pro-Russian forces and take the
eastern part of Ukraine, or you do not get your money!

Now we have the IMF, [Rothschilds] telling one country to start a civil
war and capture the Eastern Ukraine. This is how the elites work, and the
Nobel Peace Prize recipient, Barack Obama, is their front man, leading the
charge, just like he did in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. Egypt was a
purely political manuever. Libya has oil, and prior to the killing of
Muammar Gaddafi, that country used to own gold, which was the first order
of business to ransack, just as the Ukrainian gold was the first thing to
disappear, into greedy Western thieving hands. But always remember,
according to Western interests, gold has not useful value, at least not in
your hands. Syria is important for Russian access to ship natural gas to
Europe, and the US sees it as a threat to the petro- dollar. Afghanistan
has heroin that supports the CIA drug trade and a huge source of
profitable money laundering for the Rothschild banking cartel.

What of Ukraine? It may be just what the elite needs, once attempts to
provoke war in Syria failed. Why is attacking and capturing Eastern
Ukraine so important? It has rich farmland that produces income, unlike to
poorer Western Ukraine being exploited. Without the income from the
eastern farmland, how else will the IMF ever get repaid?

What has this to do with the price of gold and silver? Both PMs need to be
kept suppressed and not viewed as an alternative to the world’s largest
Ponzi scheme, the Rothschild Western banking system, totally corrupt and
insolvent to its core, but also totally in charge of all Western
governments. The BRICS nations have created a fissure that continues to
grow and remains the most viable threat to the West.

Expectations are that more European companies will start aligning
themselves with Russia and China. Germany remains a key player, in that
regard. Aligning herself with Obama may be what costs Merkel her job. Good
riddance.

It seemed developing events would have already had an impact on gold and
silver, but last week’s yet another manipulation “take-down” delayed the
inevitable. It should be an overt reminder to all of the control the
elites have to do whatever is necessary in order to maintain their power.
Maybe there will be more “suicided” events where mid- tier bankers do
their utmost best to defy gravity from varying heights of buildings.

[As an aside for our foreign readers, suicide is the taking of one's life.
Use of the term "suicided" implies that the official reports of suicide in
the 14 deaths, to date, may have been, shall we say, involuntarily
assisted, hence suicided.]

The French banker, a woman named Lydia, was considered to be the first
female to be “suicided,” by her attempt to defy gravity and leap to her
death. Somehow, Sumana Sultana, 44, a banker for Rupali Bank escaped
attention when she hung herself from her bedroom ceiling fan, back in
January. That brings the sudden rash of banker “suicides” to 15.

It is a function of the elites to create problems like Ukraine, and/or any
other area in which distractions can be used and keep people focusing on
the wrong issues.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: What happened to Armstrong's logic?
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Tue, May 13, 2014 4:42 am
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/05/11/rebels-declare-victory-in-eastern-ukraine-to-join-russia-thanks-to-claims-of-cia-plots-fascism/


Armstrong is claiming that Western European citizens have been persuaded
that the Ukrainian revolution is a USA plot, and thus Armstrong claims
that Europeans won't rush to the aid of Ukraine to start World War 3 with
Russia because they are tired of being pawns of the USA.

This is completely illogical because:

1. Western Europe can't TODAY defend itself against Russia without the
USA. So even if the Western Europeans wanted to go it alone, they would
still need to be pawns of the USA and they know this.

2. Western Europeans do not want war, that is one of the main reasons they
agreed to form the EU, was to prevent wars. Western Europeans since WW2
never send MASSIVE troops to aid other countries without a U.N. or U.S.A.
lead. The reason the Western Europeans aren't sending troops is because
they don't have enough, and they are pacifists. Your emphasis on CIA plot
as an excuse is a red-herring.


And what caused that structural faults? Socialism. And who was investing
in feminism and environmentalism in order to cause the people to become
distracted from core issues and instead bicker over such nonsense as "gay
rights", while Rome was burned up with debt.

And who is guiding the youth to see all future problems as global in
scope, e.g. climate change, human rights?

Well besides the documentation I provided to that Rockefeller was doing
that, you are also Martin! You are now telling us that we have a
responsibility to defend other people who didn't fight for their own gun
rights long ago.

And so instead of focusing your readers on the real fight for the minds of
our youth, you are misdirecting your readers' attention on illogical
nonsense.

And thus I am losing respect for you. I thought you were a smart man.


Are you seriously claiming that Rockefeller at al was not involved with
creating a national consciousness demanding socialism (in spite of the
evidence I have shown that he was funding such) and also not involved with
pulling strings to have Obama ram a health care system most of us don't
want down our throats (in spite of evidence that his organizations have
tentacles on every major US politician)?

Are you seriously claiming similar power structures did not exist during
Rome?

And why do you build a strawman of "CIA" when you know damn well that
Rockefeller is not the CIA. The CIA is only one of the elements of the
DEEP STATE which the globalists have their tentacles in.

You have turned disingenuous in debate and thus this is now a waste of time.

Let's end this. Go on your ignorant way.

I am working on a real solution. You go on with your masturbation
non-solutions.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: Spread the word that Armstrong is ignoring data
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Tue, May 13, 2014 4:11 am
To:      "Armstrong Economics" <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

> say what you want. You people are directly responsible for what is going
> on in Ukraine.
> You have a lot of blood on your hands and Russia sites your nonsense.
> You have zero respect for the lives of people and just want to champion
> your own
> nonsense. You have never been in Washington and have no clue what is
> really going on.
> For all I know, you are championing Russia for your goal is to ensure
> nobody will
> defend the people of Eastern Europe because it all just a cia plot and
> real people are incapable of rising up against corruption.
> Very sad state of affairs you put forward


Do you really believe this nonsense Martin?

If so it is very sad. I had a lot of respect for you but it evaporating.

Exactly how did I hurt the people of Ukraine? Please tell me. I am waiting.

I am a U.S. citizen, a computer programmer by profession, currently
residing in the Philippines living a simple life. How do you expect me to
have any effect whatsoever on the geopolitics going on in Ukraine?

Please tell me. You accuse me of having blood on my hands, now please tell
me how?

Isn't that remarkably socialist of you to expect that I as an individual
am responsible for other individuals on the other side of the world??

You mean I am supposed to drop everything in my life and grab my gun and
head to Ukraine?

Or you mean I am supposed to write my Congressman back in the USA pleading
for the U.S.A. to the the policeman of the world? (even though I've never
registered to vote in my entire life because I know voting is a crock of
shit)

Do you seriously believe that my government has ever used the military for
honest aims? Iraq?

And yet you hold me as an individual responsible for all that?

You condemn me to things I have no power over, just like Totalitarian
madman do.

I am afraid you've lost your mind.

That is a hard argument to sell when 12 of your last 20 post have been in Anonymint threads. If I didn't know any better I would say you were quite interested in what he has to say.

Armstrong isn't ignoring me. He is debating me in email and responding to my points in his latest blog posts. He and I have a very fundamental disagreement on this point.

Blabbermouth, you are ignored because your capability for comprehension and discernment is asymptotically approaching nil.

---

cc: Armstrong

He isn't going to change his mind.

I am writing how I feel, and being honest with myself and to my other
readers on the forum.

This issue is much more important than my relationship with Armstrong
(which I do value btw even I've never met him...if he only knew me in
person he would see how sweet and loving a person I am), but we are in a
war right now for the future of our kids.

I find don't understand how someone of his intellect could totally ignore
for example the engineered environmental and feminist movement. Is the
1972 United Nations Convention on Human Environment in Brazil, with
Rockefeller hobnobing and romping throughout Latin America to drum up
coordination just a random event? Does he not notice the video of David
Rockefeller speaking fluent Spanish.

And you don't write about this either. Thus no one mainstream (or
widespread) knows what the globalist plan is and how they plan to turn our
youth into idealistic, zombies that believe all the problems are global in
scope.

I am reaching a few thousand readers now and many. I have a guy who claims
to have a 148 IQ private message me and say I had opened his eyes.



> While I have, and do, use harsh language with people, it does not usually
> result in persuading them.

So it begins..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/10819885/David-Cameron-Taxes-will-rise-unless-we-can-raid-bank-accounts.html

They get this in place and then they will easily be able to tweek it to include everyone not only notorious tax evaders when needed.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Spread the word that Armstrong is ignoring data
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Sun, May 11, 2014 9:01 pm
To:      [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/05/11/uprising-against-corruption-is-the-global-trend-get-use-to-it/


And anyone who thinks the corruption in the world today is not aided and abetted by globalist coordination is ignoring for example the prior data I provided showing for example how Goldman Sachs organized the financial instruments that enabled Greece to hide their bad financial state from the EU before 2008, and how after 2008 former Goldman Sachs employees were installed as political leaders throughout Europe and in charge of managing the austerity programs that exacerbated the financial condition of the States which is what is driving the revolutions now.

And this myopic Armstrong is even ignoring the prior communication I sent him, wherein it is documented that the IMF is doing more of the same austerity crap designed to worsen the financial condition of Ukraine (and other States) which will foment more revolution.

And Armstrong ignores the prior communication I sent him referring him to the book Confessions of an Economic Hitman by Perkins who explains his firsthand experience as an agent of the global elite in destroying countries on purpose in order to fulfill the globalist plans for geopolitical hegemony.

And Armstrong continues to ignore the fact that both the West and Russia are playing with Ukraine as a pawn, but neither side has any thing to gain from this activity, except to bolster a globalist plan to frustrate the people of the world when revolutions fail and they must turn to an "international cooperation" NWO solution which the globalists have waiting in the wings to offer the population after this revolution cycle has run amok and ended in death, destruction, and chaos.

And Armstrong continues to ignore the murals at (and the underground bunkers built under) the Denver airport depicting the plans for the above outcome.

And Armstrong continues to ignore the well coordinated plans and actions for environmental manias (e.g. the man-made global warming hoax) in order to instill the urgency in the minds of the people for "international cooperation" which begin as early as the 1972 United Nations Convention on Human Environment in Brazil.

And he ignores the data from Anthony Sutton. And he ignores dozens (and more!) of other evidence which is too circumstantial to be random coincidence.

How can anyone continue to take MARTIN ARMSTRONG seriously, when he refuses to digest the above and the following DATA.

I URGE EVERYONE TO SPREAD THIS POST FAR AND WIDE AND SHAME ARMSTRONG. For it appears he is not a scientist (one who considers all data and falsifies all propositions), but rather an stubborn donkey or Ox.

Here are some videos of David Rockefeller to give a taste of this planned outcome:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClqUcScwnn8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxPYa5mVlYU (see facts after 7:30 min point)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIUDIzApYLE#t=673 (ignore the myopia of the interviewer, focus on Rockefeller's statements)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7da-PuTYOHo (Nick Rockefeller predicted everything happening now!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roR3sSunqpo (Rothschild's Zionism controls Obama)

(Don't forget Nick Rockefeller was governor of New York and David funded the construction of WTC)

Rockefeller funded feminism (in prior communications I documented they funded the environmental) movement:

http://rense.com/general75/how.htm

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/laurie-penny/2012/02/women-white-miller-woman-young-2

"It's interesting to note that Ford and Rockefeller and the other foundations with strong CIA connections started giving grants in the early 70s to study race and gender."

http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?topic=3781.0

Bilderberg:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZhVMRc0hzc (must watch!!!)

Video of Ron Paul admitting Bilderberg gets together to talk about how to control banking system and world's natural resources:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plo-1rLZ3Jo

Zbigniew Brzezinski:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpzJI9Yew90 (must watch!!!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SSLeWnYWAI (He confirms the globalist political movement he predicted in his 1997 book)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9pDY_ny6Qo#t=184

Kissinger (and CFR head Haas) on population control and terrorism agenda:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTd7n5VPID0

More population control globalist organization:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZODE_sRMiT0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3WXcRfsrTQ (Bill Gates lying about C02)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Gi6cf-jiI (Bill Gates' population control plan via indirect introduction of birth control, etc)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TyAJZVARPw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKoD-ow1YcM

http://letsrollforums.com/ted-turner-created-georgia-t22937.html?s=09163fd409c6ae125c4fe1832c88e860&

http://books.google.com/books?id=JoPdaWwIJHwC&pg=PT51&lpg=PT51&dq=ted+turner+georgia+guidestones

Let's throw in the confrontation of Larry Silverstein on WTC7:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I



And Armstrong still can't fathom in his stubborn, myopia, that destroying the nation-state is part of the globalist plan (thoroughly documented above and in prior communications). The globalist foment the brain-dead actions and outcome of the politicians and the sheep.

The global elite are a natural outcome of the power vacuum of democracy and widespread communication technology and the shift to the Knowledge Age are driving the consolidation of global political power.

IT IS JUST TIME, but the guy who discovered the cycle can't seem to wrap his mind around what this time is.


Armstrong must have flunked Logic 101 in high school. Why would a globalist elite intent on destroying the nation-state sovereignty want to rescue the current structure of Western society? Instead by design, they want to crash and burn the current structure, so that the world will turn only to an international solution to political organization.

And they are succeeding. It is going exactly according to plan.


That crypto-currency will emerge because:

* no physical assets will be safe from confiscation and taxation.

"Switzerland and Singapore are the latest signatories to an OECD deal on sharing data
and tax information between countries that now includes 47 nations"

* gold is a hoarding phenomenon where the velocity of money collapses, and even Armstrong has admitted they confiscate it at checkpoints globally.

* the globalists won't be prepared to offer the new financial system until after the destroy and discredit the nation-states, so this open a period of a decade or two where there will be no other option except crypto-currency.

* everyone will be able to generate some of this crypto-currency by turning on their computer. Thus it will have massive distribution and adoption.

The International Forecaster


 World Markets Update
 






by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
May 3, 2014
 

Switzerland and Singapore are the latest signatories to an OECD deal on sharing data
and tax information between countries that now includes 47 nations. The deal, pushed
in recent years by the G20, forces signatory nations to share a wide range of
financial information including bank balances, interest income, sales proceeds and
dividends. Ostensibly a plan to crack down on tax evasion by multinationals and the
global elite, it is actually part of that very elite's plan for a global
governmental system based on complete transparency of every individuals' economic
(and other) activities. This is of course a key stepping stone on the path to the
implementation of a truly global tax, an idea that has already been kicked around
for some years at the UN and other globalist bodies.
 
In the US specifically, we've been warning about Housing Bubble 2.0 and the
derivative black hole for some time. Now it seems we have illustrious company:
Warren Buffett. He headed his annual investors meeting for legendary Berkshire
Hathaway last weekend, and this year brought some unusually sober talk of financial
"discontinuity" that could result if the highly-leveraged derivatives market were to
unwind and fretting about the housing market. Although this comes as news to no one
who has been following the overheating property markets in Orange County, Austin,
Miami, Honolulu and elsewhere, it is just another sign that the Fed's wonderful QE
program for buying up toxic mortgage debt is merely inflating another housing
bubble. Mission accomplished?
 
Speaking of housing bubbles, China's own longstanding problem with its overheated
property market came under the spotlight once again this week as Nomura released a
report detailing how the country's housing bubble might have already burst. As the
report notes "Every property market leading indicator at the national level turned
down," and "The question is no longer 'if' or 'when' but rather 'how much' China's
property market will correct." To make matters worse, the problem may be exacerbated
by China's demographics.
 

 
The country's birth rate peaked in 1987, meaning that new household formation peaked
25 years later, in 2012. As developers, fed by easy credit and riding the wave of
new home buyers, ramp up construction, a glut of houses are going to be hitting an
increasingly shrinking market. The falling prices that will inevitably result are
likely to scare speculators out of the market, which has been estimated to be 15% of
home sales.
 
The UK is facing its own housing crisis as the OECD raised its head once again this
week, this time to chastise the British government for their "Help to Buy" scheme
that allows would-be homeowners to buy a newly built home for a 5% deposit, rather
than the traditional 20%. Not that the BoE or the Parliament need to be told this.
This week chancellor George Osborne has come under pressure by Lord Lawson, Lord
Lamont, and Alistair Darling (three former chancellors themselves), as well as the
LibDem and Labour parties for the program, with his political rivals accusing him of
stoking a property bubble to help the Conservatives' chances at the next election.
Since 2009, the percentage of high loan-to-income ratio mortgages (over 4.5) has
doubled to 8%, and house prices themselves have jumped 8.5% year-to-date. Although
the scheme is raising expectations of home prices, there have been relatively few
sales under the program, meaning there's a growing market for the homes and not many
people who are selling. This is leading to what many are warning could be a repeat
of the US' own housing crash of last decade. The Bank of England is supposedly
mulling over its own options for applying the brakes to the housing market,
including raising capital requirements on banks and building societies, but it's not
clear how effective that will be given the hot money that's floating around the
country due to the bank's own version of quantitative easing.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Martin stop this idiotic shit now!!
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Sat, May 10, 2014 9:10 pm
To:      [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/05/10/what-is-yours-aint-yours/

"There is no elite private conspiracy of some dominating group. That
implies some comprehension of what is even possible. I have sat in the
room with such people and these conspiracy stories give these people WAY
TOO much credit for being intelligent. Nobody smart enough to handle the
job ever seeks such positions. Governments are run by lawyer-politicians
who think they need only decree some law that solves the problem. They
understand nothing. Why should people keep money in a bank in the UK after
Cameron makes such a statement? He is way too stupid to realize people act
in anticipation."


Martin you are so easily fooled. How is that you are so astute when it
comes to analyzing history yet so damn fucking incapable of understanding
two concepts:

1. Deception

2. Compartmentalization

I don't have time to continue explaining this you. Please pour some water
on your face or something. You are behaving as obtusely as the entities
you criticize in your writings.

Cameron knows that what he is saying is crock of shit. He is saying it
because the sheeople are stupid enough to believe it.

Secondly, the elite are the not the politicians. The politicians are
guided and manipulated, and compartmentalized to some extent.

All these individuals belong to the CFR and are aware of the globalist
goals but in such compartmentalized terms that they believe this is for
the betterment of society, i.e. Obama may even believe man-made Global
warming is true and a real threat. If true, this gives him moral standing
in his own mind.

I have already shown to the you the evidence, and the UN Agenda 21 plan
and effects are decades in the making since at least the 1972 United
Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Brazil. That doesn't happen
without coordination.

I could supply you with videos and evidence of Rockefeller funding and
attending these environmentalist movements early on back then (many of
these videos have hence disappeared from Youtube since I watched them
several years ago).

They are indoctrinating the sheeople with this shit and even our youth are
idealistic and believe they will need to enslave the world in this
ideology after the global chaos that bottoms in 2032 according to your
model.

Fuck Martin! Fuck! Wake up! You are acting like a sheep.

interesting thread.

Cross-posting...


If you review the data of my prior post, you see that India total debt is more than 200% of GDP. As the global economy collapses in 2016, where is corporate income going to come from?

GDP will shrink globally by 30% or so, thus debt-to-GDP ratios will increase.

If Modi fails due to this bad timing, then won't the populace return to a socialist "solution" out of desperation? Which will only make the downslide worse.

The problem is that 1/4 of India's population can't even eat without subsidies.

And the crooks who run the country go along with reforms for as long as debt is expanding and they can get their slice of the boom, but in a bust the crooks have to turn to socialism to drive up government spending so they can milk the public spending spigot.

The point of my prior post was the developing world had been in a phase of expanding debt due to the West's ZIRP which caused fixed income to chase higher yields in the emerging market debt.

This caused the "taipans" in each emerging market country to go along with "reforms" in order to receive higher bond ratings and get their slice of that free money.

But in 2016 the trend will have radically shifted and the "taipans" will revert to their former paradigm of milking the public spigot, because the free bond money will be running back to the dollar and the USA as rates rise there and the global economy turns to chaos.

Make sure you understand this, as it applies to all emerging markets.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Bottom line is political revolution can't work any more
From:    AnonyMint
Date:    Fri, May 9, 2014 6:37 pm
To:      [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I sure hope Martin Armstrong wises up and realizes the politics is already
lost to the majority, which is a global majority of chattel managed by a
well-hidden global elite. They are even manipulating the outcome in
Ukraine. Proof is if the USA or EU was intent on Ukraine's independence,
they would ship guns to put under every blade of grass so individuals
could defend themselves (see Hitler quote below). Instead, the IMF sends
them loans in order to further the world governance plan of consolidation.


===================================================
The Ukraine situation is all about global currency and global governance.
In the
New American link you'll see a description of IMF loans to the Ukraine as
being a
vehicle to expand the SDR system.    Brandon Smith of Alt-Market is the
second link.
Gatekeeper coverage of side topics such as military factories is akin to red
herrings.
Memes of US vs. Russia "escalating tension" and hysterical pieces on the
new cold
war and WWIII are bait for world government, as well as the previously
discussed
goals of creating a dollar devaluation scapegoat; distractions from economic
contraction, corruption, spying, and police state activities; and more
justification
for heavily funding the military industrial complex against assorted faux
boogeymen.
 Smoke and mirrors.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/item/18207-imf-bailout-for-ukraine-and-a-new-world-currency

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2126-false-eastwest-paradigm-hides-the-rise-of-global-currency

> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 06:18:29 -0400
> Subject: Putin needed East Ukraine because of 50 military factories?
>
> http://www.businessinsider.com/why-putin-needs-east-and-south-ukraine-2014-5#ixzz317OqrXDd
===================================================



Excerpts from the following posts (click to read in context).

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6625901

"I consider my firearms to be useless against the government in anything
like our current social structure and any realistic balance of power on
the basis of armaments alone."

You have no fucking clue why our forefathers wanted the right to bear arms:

https://www.google.com/search?q=forefathers+reason+for+right+to+bear+arms

http://www.rense.com/general2/right.htm

And so how did Hitler overrun Europe as easily as a hot knife slicing
through butter:

"Tyrannical governments kill far more people than private criminals. The
Nazis conducted a massive search-and-seizure operation in 1933 to disarm
their political opponents, in 1938 to disarm the Jews, and when they
occupied Europe in 1939-41 they proclaimed the death penalty for anyone
who failed to surrender all guns within 24 hours."




https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6640975

Blah, blah, blah.

Bottom line is what I wrote upthread. The Federal goverment is now 75% of
the GDP in the USA (including regulation compliance, see my sources
upthread).

If we can't personally defend ourselves, we will end up like the UK (where
0.2% own 69% of the land) or worse perhaps like one of the countries
Hitler rolled though and put in concentration camps.

Any way, as I have admitted upthread, I think the time for physical
revolution has long since passed. The majority of the population are
chattel and deserve their fate.

That is why I work on anonymous crypto-currency for those who want to move
into a Knowledge Age economy which is unfettered by government. I discuss
this in great detail in the following thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-adoption-slowing-coinbase-bitpay-is-enough-to-make-bitcoin-a-fiat-557732

So I want to bow out of this discussion, because politics (e.g. tvbcof's
ad hominem attacks on Bundy to misdirect attention away from the Fed
govt's abusive growth) is such an enormous waste of breath and time. The
only things that ever make a difference are technology that enables
individual action. I point that out in the above linked thread.

http://blog.mpettis.com/2014/03/will-emerging-markets-come-back/#comment-22683

Armstrong doesn't understand what is frontier now; thus his myopia on globalism

Armstrong is still exploring (attempting to refute) the contention about whether there is globalist agenda and what is/are the potential solution(s) to the enslavement of the people as fodder in geopolitical top-down control.

It amazes me that he apparently can't visualize what is obvious to me as the only potential explanation and outcome. Let me try to see if I can more convincingly elucidate the map I 'see' in my brain.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/05/04/complexity-in-trends/


Martin speculates that the "Justice Department were ignorant of international currency transactions". He has no way to prove that they did not fully understand but decided to pretend they did not. This is just an example where a human is not as objective as a computer, because emotions and confirmation biases are difficult for humans to eliminate from their subjective analysis.

Any way, Armstrong has demonstrated nothing above about whether a global agenda exists or not. One can envision that to keep all the parties vested in a global agenda involves a lot of corruption and that corruption can't always be contained in predictable ways, and the system AUTONOMOUSLY adjusts to sustain the corruption (because corruption binds them together otherwise they could all be jailed). The evidence of that effect is the corrupt system put Armstrong in the slammer for 7 years on a bogus contempt of court charge.


And with all the coorperation amongst a large group, amazingly Armstrong thinks the "NY Club" is isolated and not part of any larger globalist agenda. And he presents absolutely no proof to support such an incredulous position, given the volumes of evidence I have presented to show not only is there a globalist agenda, but there is actual laws and actions occurring that implement that agenda globally in every country on earth. Is Martin blinded to the Agenda 21 activities against farmers in Latin America?

https://www.google.com/search?q=Agenda+21+activities+against+farmers+in+Latin+America

Is Armstrong blind to the manipulation of Greece's economy done by Goldman Sachs, and then appointments of Goldman Sachs persons as leaders all over Europe recently.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/what-price-the-new-democracy-goldman-sachs-conquers-europe-6264091.html


Duh Martin, then why did you write that assumption above.


Then please explain why Goldman has its tentacles throughout the EU fuckfest. You even noted that the creation of the EU was designed to be flawed. Is that random? No! It was by design.


Martin you understand statistics. What is the probability of that level of integration by Goldman due to random orthogonal events and greed. ROUGHLY ZERO.

I am tired of this nonsense. Armstrong is smarter than this. I don't know why he can't do some actual research and overcome his confirmation bias. Obstinance?


Because there is a power vacuum of democracy and it must be filled. You should understand thermodynamics.

This vested interest binds them together, because they can't win control of that power vacuum otherwise.

This is entirely consistent with nature.


Armstrong is conflating orthogonal issues again. I am empathizing with the plight of the Ukrainians, but there is nothing we can do to help them, because we would be merely fighting for the elite and helping the manipulation. The only way for Ukrainians to win is either to have armed themselves with a gun under every blade of grass like in the USA, or for some technological solution to come which enables them to side-step (opt-out) of the power vacuum of democracy, i.e. defund the taxation and political-industrial complex.

And those prior revolutions were also manipulated for outcomes which favored the elite. We would need to get into a deep study of history to debate that, and I don't have time right now. I do believe there was more chaos at that time, because communication and travel was slower thus the chance we see now with anonymous crypto-currency was instead at the time taking the form of distance from the powers-that-be in Europe in the case of the American Revolution.


Armstrong also has nothing but speculation, at least I have provided volumes of evidence.

The difference now is that global technocracy is a reality and they can track everything. You bring the idealistic youth onboard and they will create an EU style fuckfest "international cooperation" for the entire world. And Rockefeller et al will have achieved their Agenda 21 consolidation of control and power over taxation and issuance of debt.


The only effectual physical revolution you will be seeing are the zombie idealistic youth for "international cooperation", after the global war and chaos from 2016 to 2024 or 2032.

This globe has been shrunk by technology. The only remaining frontier for freedom is cryptography. Armstrong has a dinosaur perspective and he needs to correct this pronto!



"Protester Paul Connor sits on the lawns of Parliament House on day 34 of his hunger strike calling for climate change action, on Dec. 10, 2009, in Canberra, Australia."


Rockefeller's true networth is in the $trillions and is hidden behind NGOs, corporations, etc..


Whether Obama is stupid or not is irrelevant because he isn't the mastermind. He could be (and is likely) compartmentalized. You again speculate. The reality is the agenda is being put into action, and the youth will be indoctrinated and ready to embrace it as "international cooperation".


No politicians are about sustaining the cooperation that keeps their brethren in control of the power vacuum of democracy.

That is a fundamental myopia of Armstrong. He must correct this.


It doesn't even matter if there is a mastermind or not, the reality is Armstrong doesn't even identify the main trend in place, which is not just taxation but rather subjugating sovereignty to the collective on a wider scale as I have explained.


And now finally I understand why Armstrong doesn't get it. He thinks the revolution will be physical. He hasn't realized the world has shrunk due to technology, and physical revolution can't overcome the great powers and the global technocracy. These revolutions will all be manipulated by the great powers.

The revolution and frontier is cryptography. I've been trying to tell him this for several months.

Continuing evidence in the debate with Armstrong about whether a global elite exist.

Passing along a comment I received, and I don't have time to verify it.

============
globalist (zionist) background on Russia and Ukraine

You are so busy you may not be aware of the Holodomor, the Ukrainian famine genocide
many believe Stalin engineered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

Here's something I recently stumbled on.  It's a book written by Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn, 200 Years Together.  This book is never spoken of in the west, despite
Solzhenitsyn's status as a Nobel laureate (The Gulag Archipelago), because he
details the Russian Zionists' complicity in vast Soviet atrocities against its own
populations.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/200_Years_Together

Long Wave Cycle (a generational cycle)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6551625