Is escrowing for yourself using a secret alt OK? - page 6.

Coinonomous

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:44:17 PM

Quote from: Coinonomous on September 12, 2015, 09:43:26 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:38:27 PM

Why wouldn't he be allowed? Because he was pretending to be banned. Undecided

The more this guys posts, the digger he deeps his hole.

This guy is so delusional he would make a great case study for a psychologist interested in studying GREED and multiple-personality (deceptions, or disorders?? lmfao). Grin

Keep doubling-down , doubling down .. You only look more and more ridiculous to the majority of the forum. Please do us all a favor and TRULY leave, already? Roll Eyes

Finally, someone else thinking the same way.

If this doesn't make Quickseller leave, what will?

It will just further anger him. He has no self-control, that's clearly evident as we watch his utter downfall and destruction of trust in real-time.

Pierre11

hero member

Activity: 502

Merit: 500

ATTENTION

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 07:17:44 PM

Are you crying because I might have other DT accounts already that will tag your scammer accounts?

That was in PM. Please find his alts and mark them so people know its Quickseller, a liar and dishonest man.

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Coinonomous on September 12, 2015, 09:43:26 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:38:27 PM

Why wouldn't he be allowed? Because he was pretending to be banned. Undecided

The more this guys posts, the digger he deeps his hole.

This guy is so delusional he would make a great case study for a psychologist interested in studying GREED and multiple-personality (deceptions, or disorders?? lmfao). Grin

Keep doubling-down , doubling down .. You only look more and more ridiculous to the majority of the forum. Please do us all a favor and TRULY leave, already? Roll Eyes

Finally, someone else thinking the same way.

If this doesn't make Quickseller leave, what will?

Coinonomous

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:38:27 PM

Why wouldn't he be allowed? Because he was pretending to be banned. Undecided

The more this guys posts, the digger he deeps his hole.

QS is so delusional he would make a great case study for a psychologist interested in studying GREED and multiple-personality (deceptions, or disorders?? lmfao). Grin

Keep doubling-down , doubling down .. You only look more and more ridiculous to the majority of the forum. Please do us all a favor and TRULY leave, already? Roll Eyes

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:38:27 PM

Look what Quickseller posted under that account:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I believe I am allowed to post in scam accusations threads that have to do with me.

Why wouldn't he be allowed? Because he was pretending to be banned. Undecided

The more this guys posts, the digger he deeps his hole.

Is there a rule about being able to post only in certain sections/threads while someone is banned? Is the scam accusations section mentioned in that rule?

Wouldn't it have been more accurate to say "I am not allowed to post here..." if I was banned?

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:39:48 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:36:20 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:35:35 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:34:37 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:33:34 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

Let's make a bet. If I bought this account, you give me 1 BTC. If I didn't buy this account, I give you 10 BTC.

Fair?

Sure, prove that you have 10 BTC

I'll sell all my possessions to buy and send you 10 BTC if what you claim is true.

Sorry. I am not going to make that bet if I cannot be assured that I will receive payment immediately after the conditions of my winning such bet would be met (and I would obviously need you to put such funds in escrow ahead of time).

If you want to make the bet, I can gather 10 BTC

. Let me know if you want to do the bet.

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:37:47 PM

Quote from: achow101 on September 12, 2015, 09:35:52 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

You created an account called QS banned (Archive]. The banned part of that implies that you were banned at the time of the creation of the account although it was not specified for how long. Furthermore, you created this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059 which proves that you owned that account.

Implies is the key word in that sentence my friend. You also archived the incorrect link LMAO

Give up. Arguing will get you nowhere.

I told you, make a new thread explaining yourself and admitting/apologizing your mistakes. Clearly you did some wrongs, and there's no way out of it. About time you grow some balls to finally admit you did something wrong?

Now I'm no police, but you're making too much of a scene on this forum because you continue to fight back against something you'll never win. You could argue with me, Vod, tspacepilot, and everybody else, or just apologize. You got caught already with more than enough proof....

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:36:20 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:35:35 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:34:37 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:33:34 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

Let's make a bet. If I bought this account, you give me 1 BTC. If I didn't buy this account, I give you 10 BTC.

Fair?

Sure, prove that you have 10 BTC

I'll sell all my possessions to buy and send you 10 BTC if what you claim is true.

Sorry. I am not going to make that bet if I cannot be assured that I will receive payment immediately after the conditions of my winning such bet would be met (and I would obviously need you to put such funds in escrow ahead of time).

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: achow101 on September 12, 2015, 09:35:52 PM

You created an account called QS banned (Archive]. The banned part of that implies that you were banned at the time of the creation of the account although it was not specified for how long. Furthermore, you created this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059 which proves that you owned that account.

I forgot about that!

Look what Quickseller posted under that account:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I believe I am allowed to post in scam accusations threads that have to do with me.

Why wouldn't he be allowed? Because he was pretending to be banned. Undecided

The more this guys posts, the digger he deeps his hole.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: achow101 on September 12, 2015, 09:35:52 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

You created an account called QS banned (Archive]. The banned part of that implies that you were banned at the time of the creation of the account although it was not specified for how long. Furthermore, you created this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059 which proves that you owned that account.

Implies is the key word in that sentence my friend. You also archived the incorrect link LMAO

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:35:35 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:34:37 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:33:34 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

Let's make a bet. If I bought this account, you give me 1 BTC. If I didn't buy this account, I give you 10 BTC.

Fair?

Sure, prove that you have 10 BTC

I'll sell all my possessions to buy and send you 10 BTC if what you claim is true.

lahm-44

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

i don't want to say anything bad for anyone because everyone has a different point of view and that person is right from his view..but i just want to say that i am using escrow only for my safty i don't want to be my funds got stolen or someone scammed me (maybe that can be situation when i need to transact that money and it can be very important for me)..i hate scammers specially at those situations and escrowers help me to transact or complete the deals safely

achow101

staff

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6793

Just writing some code

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

You created an account called QS banned (Archive]. The banned part of that implies that you were banned at the time of the creation of the account although it was not specified for how long. Furthermore, you created this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059 which proves that you owned that account.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:34:37 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:33:34 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

Let's make a bet. If I bought this account, you give me 1 BTC. If I didn't buy this account, I give you 10 BTC.

Fair?

Sure, prove that you have 10 BTC

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:33:34 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

Let's make a bet. If I bought this account, you give me 1 BTC. If I didn't buy this account, I give you 10 BTC.

Fair?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:30:36 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I honestly don't think Quickseller views his lying and escrow scamming as wrong. It's very possible he grew up in a household that encouraged such behavior.

I am still waiting for an answer to my previous questions.....

Thoughtful

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:33:01 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:30:36 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I honestly don't think Quickseller views lying and escrow scamming as wrong. It's very possible he grew up in a household that encouraged such behavior.

I can tell. His perceptions are completely incorrect. How many stories have you heard of Quickseller adding trust for a very bad/stupid reason? Too many.

LMFAO +1 +1 +1 +1 ^^^^^^^^^

so fuckin true! fuck you quickseller you're an idiot!

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on September 12, 2015, 09:27:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:23:50 PM

The exact words Quickseller used were

"Forced 3 day break from the forum Be back Saturday".

Since he didn't have a forced 3 day ban, that makes Quickseller a proven liar.

"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12331922"

Is the word "ban" anywhere in that statement? Would there be any other reasons why one might force themselves from taking a break from the forum?

Assuming that you could somehow conclude that the above statement is a lie, you still have the issue of proving that I stole money from someone which is what is causing you to be liable for libel.

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I have no interest in reading posts that are overwhelmingly obvious being made to build up your account and later sell. If you wanted to post from your main account (not that I don't know what it is), and not one that was purchased sometime before mid May of this year, then I would consider reading your posts

[BTC]onFIRE

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vod on September 12, 2015, 09:30:36 PM

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I honestly don't think Quickseller views lying and escrow scamming as wrong. It's very possible he grew up in a household that encouraged such behavior.

I can tell. His perceptions are completely incorrect. How many stories have you heard of Quickseller adding trust for a very bad/stupid reason? Too many.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: [BTC]onFIRE on September 12, 2015, 09:29:06 PM

Why are you still trying to talk your way out? You didn't read my post? -_-

I honestly don't think Quickseller views his lying and escrow scamming as wrong. It's very possible he grew up in a household that encouraged such behavior.

Topic: Is escrowing for yourself using a secret alt OK? - page 6. (Read 13138 times)