Topic: Is ICO regulation good or bad? - page 27. (Read 31583 times)
ICO regulation is a bad. It is bad because regulation will kill creativity nd originality! The operator and the developer will not have enough space to work. They will be distracted spending quality time and resources on admnistration, compliance etc. It take time to develop something worthwhile.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
maybe if the country set ico it is a good thing. avoiding the scam that developers do. especially if in all countries legalize bitcoin. I guess bitcoin will rise 100%
As long as it can be beneficial to the development of ICO, you can not prohibit it
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I am in favor of that for it will help to lessen the scammers if it will be regulated effectively. We cannot control someone doing such a scam thing but at least when there are rules and limitations before launching a particular ICO, scammers may be warn by doing such things.
But, i guess, doing such regulations is a very hard thing to do because we cannot control everyone from posting in the internet.
Its good as well as bad too. Good is that, chances be scam will be less.
LOL @ people that think regulation is going to magically stop scammers. Do your diligence and don't expect a nanny state to do it for you.
In my opinion, it is good for ICO market as bad elements automatically removed after regulated market. Some ICOs collect money and run away without delivering their promises and regulations bound them to follow the guidelines otherwise they cannot enter the market.
Although it may be pretty nice to make money nonstop through various ICO's, there will always be new people trying to make money on new projects. That is why there is so many ICO's nowadays.
I would love to see a global/industry standard/framework for ICO regulation. A simple guideline for participants to safely and legally contribute to an ICO is definitely needed. Bancor seems to be on the right path in regards to this. The reality of the matter is that companies need to conform to the legal rules set in place by the country of residence if they wish to succeed. Perhaps a foundation would be the best way forward as they would have the capacity to lobby on the industry's behalf in countries that ban or severely regulate ICOs.
It's good. Way too much scam in this industry at the moment.
I agree. Clear and simple regulation would cut down on the number of people who are just chasing money and have no real project. It would also help reduce the amount of overt scamming. This would let the real projects shine through, which is important component of making sure crypto/blockchain tech makes an impact in the world.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
maybe if the country set ico it is a good thing. avoiding the scam that developers do. especially if in all countries legalize bitcoin. I guess bitcoin will rise 100%
Many people - many opinions. I personally am against regulation. Time of the coin exit after ICO, you can safely delay for 3 - 12 months. This is bad in our time.
In my fantasy land, ICO regulation would be an optional-but-generally-good choice. So if I want to run an unregulated ICO for reasons of political idealism, I should be free to do that; however, if you don't want to invest in any ICO that hasn't been signed off on by a major regulatory agency, that's just being smart with your money.
In other words, given the decentralized, international nature of public blockchains, trying to pigeonhole an ICO into any one jurisdiction or regulatory framework is illogical. At the same time, by voluntarily complying with regulations and getting officialdom's stamp of approval constitutes a valuable endorsement that most ICOs (and most investors) should want to seek.
In other words, given the decentralized, international nature of public blockchains, trying to pigeonhole an ICO into any one jurisdiction or regulatory framework is illogical. At the same time, by voluntarily complying with regulations and getting officialdom's stamp of approval constitutes a valuable endorsement that most ICOs (and most investors) should want to seek.
It's good. Way too much scam in this industry at the moment.
I am very new to Bitcoin, but I see a lot op hype about this upcoming coin? Should I invest?
https://my.electroneum.com/join/88F8EB
https://my.electroneum.com/join/88F8EB
In my opinion, it is good for ICO market as bad elements automatically removed after regulated market. Some ICOs collect money and run away without delivering their promises and regulations bound them to follow the guidelines otherwise they cannot enter the market.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I always look for the negative side of regulating the ICO and other crypto. The funds and crypto will control and no one can avail the coins, tokens, altcoins and bitcoins. It is not a good side for me, they won't let us to earn money without a commission or paying for them. There's no positive side on regulating our boards. I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
regulation of ico I think is good because it can increase trust investors because many ICO that contains fraud and my friend also been deceived, with the regulation may be ico will more and more demand.
Now I suppose that regulation is only way for spreading crypto around the world. Really big money will come to this market only when it's safe enough for big investors.
I think even though the majority of us think of complete decentralization as a dream come true, 99% of us are not prepared for it, what more to say of the 99% of those who do not know about cryptocurrencies? Until we can equip everyone with the same awareness and basic knowledge, that is, education, we will see a lot of people exploit the majority with scams and deceit.
So for this protection, I believe regulation is good. But eventually, it must become democratic.
So for this protection, I believe regulation is good. But eventually, it must become democratic.
Whether or not ICO depends on the work of the team and the products they make. And for regulation, this is very good in my opinion. In order for each country to filter out ICO Projects that are less considered less attractive and can be detrimental to investors.
Jump to: