Honestly, it is a necessary evil, people cannot go on like this investing in something that has no guaranty of returns, Cryptocurrency investment should not fall into an HYIP type of investment where investors will take the risk of hit or miss.
If there is a regulation let's see how it is going to be implemented and how they are going to remain decentralized.
Topic: Is ICO regulation good or bad? - page 8. (Read 31573 times)
positive, ico will have a legal basis and will be protected by the state as a legal asset, with that the scammers will not dare to do further to cheat.
negative, it might be a tax problem, and sometimes it is considered inappropriate by some participants.
negative, it might be a tax problem, and sometimes it is considered inappropriate by some participants.
If Crypto is regulated by the government, of course, there will be good and bad effects. I think the government's entry into Crypto will make ICO opportunities grow. And trust for investors will also grow. In addition, security will be very guarded and fraudsters will be punished.
I think that the entry of the government in the crypto world does not necessarily make ICO grow. because of the growth of ICO we can't know it. but if it is for approval in the crypto world, of course there will be, if the government has plunged and it is possible that the market will be fine, and its security will be maintained.
For one type of people its good, for another - not so much. For professional/institutional/accredited investors regulations is good because it makes their investments more safer and transparent, but for small investors there are a lot of papers and permissions need to do etc.
The current position of the ICO forces investors to look for other methods of investing in new projects, it is impossible to leave without regulation, otherwise the ICO will simply cease to attract funds in a couple of years
For one type of people its good, for another - not so much. For professional/institutional/accredited investors regulations is good because it makes their investments more safer and transparent, but for small investors there are a lot of papers and permissions need to do etc.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think it is more necessary to have an advisory board to review ICOs, there must be laws for ICO to reduce fraud. And there is a good board for ICO projects but they lack resources. I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
Personally, I am convinced that now the correct regulation of the ICO market is becoming a really very useful and important initiative for the market. Thanks to such changes, it will be possible to restore confidence among investors, increasing the total number of investments. But for this result, you need to wait at least several years.
If Crypto is regulated by the government, of course, there will be good and bad effects. I think the government's entry into Crypto will make ICO opportunities grow. And trust for investors will also grow. In addition, security will be very guarded and fraudsters will be punished.
Crypto will be centralized because government was holding the main key in this case. Remember about the fact that we need a little regulation to make the developer wanna do KYC and put it into the trusted party to create transparency to the investors. 
It is a pretty difficult question because on the one hand crypto currencies were created for anonymity and the lack of the third party and such actions will not support these core factors, but on the other hand there are too much scam projects on the market and we need to find a way of how to protect investors from them.
If Crypto is regulated by the government, of course, there will be good and bad effects. I think the government's entry into Crypto will make ICO opportunities grow. And trust for investors will also grow. In addition, security will be very guarded and fraudsters will be punished.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
If this will progress, I think it would be better to be regulated rather than letting those scams spread all over crypto most especially ICO.
I believe that the regulation of ICO carries more advantages, since finally we will be able to clear the market from scams. When only professional teams and professional investors remain on the ICO market, the projects will have real value and significance, competition will increase and their development will accelerate.
I think that ICO regulation is a necessary measure regardless of whether it is bad or good, since too many people become victims of scams.
yes right because with the regulation on the ICO going forward there will be no more scam projects that are scattered and only harm the victims.
so there's no need to worry anymore if there are regulations on ICO for investors to invest in their projects and that will also have a positive impact on the market situation.
That's pretty good, especially investors and bounty participants feel safe when there is a rule for ico if they want to fund using ico. this is very important to avoid fraud and also things that can harm many people
It is not that easy to achieve. Although most of this is written, no one appears when the implementation time comes. If there is mutual respect, they can get more. But, most projects see themselves as unchangeable. 
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
For me it doesn't matter if the ico is decentralized or not, just important is they can give both help to anyone here in this of business.
And besides in some angle there is a positive way if the ico will become regulated, like it can give help to increase the economy of each country for sure in the near future.
I think that ICO regulation is a necessary measure regardless of whether it is bad or good, since too many people become victims of scams.
If regulation is carried out out of good intentions, and the project develops and benefits all participants and the economy of the country, then this is correct and promising. That will also help to more effectively deal with fraud.
KYC verification should be applied to the creator of ico and that must become an optional choice for the bounty hunters to complete the KYC verification but the opposite thing was happening. we need verification to avoid the fraud dude. 
I think the rules on ICO are very good. because basically the market needs rules. so that not all of them act as they wish, and sometimes many use the ICO freely, so sometimes there are those who use ICO incorrectly
ICO regulation right now is desperately needed as there are a lot of scammers put there, polluting the crypto world and making it seem to investors as not dim fit for investment.
The rate of scam is too high as day by day several scam projects are being launched.
The rate of scam is too high as day by day several scam projects are being launched.
ICOs regulations is indeed a very good move in the crypto space because of the increased rate of ICOs scam, which is giving the whole crypto market a negative trust amongst investors. If ICOs get regulated, it will reduce the scam rates and therefore bring in more investors into the market.
Jump to: