Topic: Is ICO regulation good or bad? - page 9. (Read 31573 times)
I think at this moment ico ecosystem really need some regulations. Cause this ecosystem is destroying itself day by day for the one reason scam and failed projects. In last few months we saw many projects who collected money form general people and investors and then simply disappeared. And some of them successful during ico but when it comes to development they just failed. Some of them never listed their token anywhere. So people are getting this kind of problem day by day. I think only regulations can stop this things.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
in my opinion it is good because every time the ico project offered is getting more intense, but there are too many fake ico at the moment and it is difficult to distinguish, they plan neatly, the price problem is not problematic if appropriate I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
That's pretty good, especially investors and bounty participants feel safe when there is a rule for ico if they want to fund using ico. this is very important to avoid fraud and also things that can harm many people
I think that regulation is not very good. Regulation creates many obstacles for small investors. Cryptocurrencies are designed to be free and easily accessible. Therefore, I think that regulation is bad.
yes regulation may be contrary to crypto properties because there will be a body that controls it. and I think if regulations are held to raise the standards of a project that wants to introduce their platform, then I agree to this
I think that regulation is not very good. Regulation creates many obstacles for small investors. Cryptocurrencies are designed to be free and easily accessible. Therefore, I think that regulation is bad.
If regulation is carried out out of good intentions, and the project develops and benefits all participants and the economy of the country, then this is correct and promising. That will also help to more effectively deal with fraud.
the regulations that made by some countries to limit ICO funding aim to reduce fraud crimes or reduce the flow of funds from out of the country. because funds come out of the country without providing income which means it will damage the country's economy. obviously ICO funding must indeed be limited. this seems to be limiting but by the state also wants to protect assets and its citizens.
Regulations of ICO will be good to a certain level in order to curtail scam project and this will allow investors to invest huge amount in ICO but will limit the chance of investors will small money to invest.
ICO regulation is necessary. Due to the lack of regulation in 2017-2018, there were a lot of scammers in the ICO market. People stopped investing their money in projects. Now on Binance are held ICO. Investors go there. The future is with sites like Launchpad Binance.
It is the best and most necessary, especially for investors to continue believing in technology. It is also positive because financial frauds will cease, besides, I understand that the regulations for ICOs are very demanding, they request a lot of documentation and everything must be under the law.
They will also monitor them, they will have a clear study of the entire team that makes up the ICO, I think that they will study if possible, the funds they collect will enforce what they promised, if not, they can have serious sanctions.
They will also monitor them, they will have a clear study of the entire team that makes up the ICO, I think that they will study if possible, the funds they collect will enforce what they promised, if not, they can have serious sanctions.
Of course, for investors to make a profit and protect their investments is the main task. But the idea and the principle of decentralization will then be violated. Perhaps, insurance of contributions to the ICO this is exit for investors ?
Who would dare say ICO regulation is bad? Regulation is what ICO actually needs the most ,without it ICO will still face hard time in the future and STO will be the only total option left ,regulation is the only way to revive ICO
Yes, it is very good and its a great thing to see the regulation to prevent money laundering from the scammers and most of the scumbag.
I think the arrangement for ICO is very good because this will make investor confidence stronger. There are many ICO frauds because they are carried out by irresponsible people. And if the ICO is regulated, of course, they will not dare to commit fraud and investors will feel safe.
You are absolutely right in everything: that the ICO needs to be regulated, and that there are positive and negative aspects of regulation. The positive side is that investors will be protected and their risks will be minimized. Also, the cryptosphere can develop at the expense of the state, and not just private investors. The negative side - restrictions in favor of the state, and this is very undesirable.
I think regulating ICOs is a necessity in this present cryptocurrency space because of the increase rate of fraudulent activities with ICOs. Statistics shows that over 80% of the ICOs that launched in 2018 were scam, this calls for a drastic change. I think ICOs regulation will curb this fraudulent activities and give ICOs a trusted sign and make it safer for businesses and investors.
More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.
For me, I would say it's good mate. To regulate may be daunting because it can impose more requirements and burden to its users; however, on the other hand, that very same act is a means to amp up the protection that a person who ventures in ICO may get. If it's regulated, then it would add more security, which in turn, may invigorate the ICO market. I mean, these days, many have already shifted their means of business to other department of the cryptocurrency market because the ICO market is one of those markets that have been susceptible to so many losses and even scams, so it's trust rating is at an all time low.
It is difficult for me to draw conclusions today, because today there is such a direction as STO, which seems to be already regulated as STO fully complies with the documents regulated by the SEC, so I think that in general it already exists.
The number of scammers has not decreased, I also did not notice a favorable impact on the crypto currency, radical measures are needed, so that even scammers do not have a desire to meddle in this area, so that they understand that they will not work out
I think that the regulation of ICO is the first step to the recognition of cryptocurrency as a means of payment. I believe that the investor should be protected as any user for example as Visa or MasterCard users.
Of course this will be a good thing for entire crypto industry.
Image of crypto was affected badly by a lot of scam ICO being raised mainly in 2018. Regulations of ICOs would be beneficial first for Ico-based projects, that would keep one chance to get money through ICO.
Image of crypto was affected badly by a lot of scam ICO being raised mainly in 2018. Regulations of ICOs would be beneficial first for Ico-based projects, that would keep one chance to get money through ICO.
Jump to: