Topic: Is rank of bounty manager is really matters? - page 10. (Read 1741 times)
Yes, it really matter the ranks file of a bounty manager in an ICO because the trust and confidence of an ICO is in the hands of a manager which could be refers as an expert in that business and done to many success ICO in a market place plus the comfortable to be work once you know already the responsibilty of a manager they have accomplished.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
For me it matters a lot that an ICO employ the expertise of bounty managers with high ranks. High ranking established members here will simply not jeopardize their stature for a project that's not well think off. Although i will not generalize all of them. I was once had an experience with a well-known name bounty manager here that after the ICO, he disappeared immediately as he was already payed and just did not care whether the bounty participants will be payed or not.
Managers with high rank inspire more confidence than newcomers, who no one knows. a manager whose high rank values his reputation and is less likely that you will not receive a reward.
In my opinion, the rank of the bounty manager should be a Member or higher. The ICOs handled by Juniors are looked like a scams. Of course, it is not correct to dye those ICOs by the bad color with no any deep argument. Often the teams create a Newbie named as their project to manage a certain bounty campaign, and this account works pretty well, therefore it is better to look at the result of the bounty manager's work.
A lot of managers with high rank of cheating , and there are low
I think in General no matter what rank , but of course it is better to go to a high rank in the bounty
I think in General no matter what rank , but of course it is better to go to a high rank in the bounty
For me, it matter because in this we can see the experience of bounty manager here in the forum. Many experience, more to be legitimate of the bounty manager. The account is the matters here in forum. Higher rank have more efforts when it comes to the forum. We know that we can trust this bounty manager.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
It is important that the Bounty Manager have a high rank position in bitcointalk forum. It means he have already a n experience on how the bounty works and they cannot take risk their high rank account for a single campaign. a junior rank manager cannot be trusted, many scam campaigns are handled by low ranks in the forum. Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
For me the rank of the bounty manager does not really matter. What matters the most is the reputation of the manager. Whether he is trustworthy and there are some bounty that he manage that became successful.
When you talk about any of the bounty campaign, then the thing which carries the most significant importance when it comes to that of making of more amount of money, then that important factor is your rank. You can only get higher ranks if you are putting in enough of the efforts and that if you have enough knowledge regarding the things and that you are giving enough of your time as well.
Do not rely solely on any ratings or scores for a specific manager. After all, I can now recall some of the known accounts, the cooperation with which ended not in the best way. Therefore, before you start working with the project, you should definitely conduct your research.
For me personally, all these ratings and levels do not have much significance. If the manager has already been replaced in the deception of people, it is unlikely that his ratings will be corrected. Therefore, I always conduct my own research before joining the project.
I generally look at Bounty manager rank, and prefer bounties with hi rank of manager, but if it's rank is Junior, i analyze project more precisely, look at ico ratings sites, etc. Not always junior as manager means scam.
I also think that sometimes they create a new account to participate in the gift company. And I think the older the bounty rating the Manager runs the company, the longer he gets involved, and that also means he should be more experienced than the younger members
I will choose the bounty manager carefully. I trust the bounty managers with Yahoo, Huahui, needmoney, Sylon, HOTACHY, Arteezy and so on.
Although some of them are very severe, their reward is better than the other bounty.
Although some of them are very severe, their reward is better than the other bounty.
for me the rank of bounty manager is not very important, which is important to me project concept is the most important thing for bounty hunters .. because high rank manager is not the benchmark the project will succeed
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I believe that it does not really matter. After all, in case the campaign itself is legal, I will still join her, despite the personalities of the managers. After all, I believe that legitimate projects will not focus on open fraud.
Sometimes high rank leaders can fail the project, sometimes the younger ones can success. It's unpredictible.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Sometimes the rank of the bounty manager is highly indicative of whether or not the campaign will actually pay. It is easy for a jr.member account to host a campaign and never pay anyone after because he/she can easily throw away the account. On the other hand, a legendary account manager will be throwing a way an expensive account if he/she decides not to pay out.
I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
Regarding my experience, bounty manager has no power to control amy project whether the project is highly paying or scam.Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.
I can say bounty manager also one of people who join the campaign so they can not make sure the capability of the project. So bounty manager is not really matter for me.
For me the rank of the bounty manager does not really matter. What matters the most is the reputation of the manager. Whether he is trustworthy and there are some bounty that he manage that became successful.
I used to think it matters until recently. I saw some bounties managed by senior members scamming people. So there is no guarantee even if the bounty is managed by some senior or hero members. May be they don't do proper research before accepting the bounty project. I think they should be more careful while managing bounties because there are many people who trust on those members.
Many ICOs who self-manage their bounties will have Newbie ranked BM, simply because they only create the account to run the bounty and make the ANN. This in no way means they are less capable of running a bounty campaign.
Additionally, there are several high-ranked members who manage bounties who have had to make apologies in recent times because of their greed/lack of scrutiny, so there are absolutely no guarantees with any of this.
If you signup to any bounty campaign, you have to be prepared to come away with nothing, much like the ICO investors themselves, but at least we only lose time, not funds.
Additionally, there are several high-ranked members who manage bounties who have had to make apologies in recent times because of their greed/lack of scrutiny, so there are absolutely no guarantees with any of this.
If you signup to any bounty campaign, you have to be prepared to come away with nothing, much like the ICO investors themselves, but at least we only lose time, not funds.
Jump to: