Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 15. (Read 5484 times)
I think TG is no any different to other socials, it's just a new one. The success of ICO depends on how hard the team worked on it, on how honest they are and on how good they promote it. The idea, the WP, the Roadmap is what defines the quality of the project and separates the promising one (like Aworker, NEO, EOS maybe, Bitupper and others) from the scam
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Maybe yes because it is only most comfortable to communicate the investor and the trader compare to the other platform. And having a success in telegram mirrored the success in the bounty because there is lot of people negotiating and giving time on it and because of that we can consider the success of the campaign. We must have faith and trust in the campaign and we've join because without this thing we cannot tell that it will become successful if the members of it have no trust in the manager. With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Yes , this is big truth that in now days to have a ICO to be successful they should have big amount of crowds and specially at the telegram because many people ( mostly big rich people ) are having al better services at the telegram and that are making them to.come at the telegram , and here it is a big factor that out of every 10 person there will be a one person or that group that will invest in ICO .With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
So here clearly big crowd at the telegram will give you big Result of the the success in the ICO , otherwise another platforms are better but having a telegram offical group is a better thing for the ICO to communicate with users with more transparency .
I think it is a measure of success. Of course, it is a helpful platform for communication. It is more convenient, because usually you get quick response and can communicate with other investors or read some helpful info. But if telegram group is dead, it is suspicious and can be scam. You just need to check whether there are a lot of members because it is required for bounty or Airdrop and that’s why group is big. In this case it wouldn’t be an indicator, but if there are about 20k members without all these required stuff it is a measure of success.
An active telegram group with a large number of members shows how good the project with their marketing strategy, up shows how active the project community is.
The other factors that you need to consider is the activeness of the developer, and the total supply of the coins,and the case of the roadmap of the project.
Of course, the success of ICO depends on many factors. The most ambitious placement of coins in history is aimed at financing the development of the Telegram Open Network. Tokens will allow you to make cheap payments in real time and eventually become the basis of a single platform for decentralized identification, storage, and so on.
It certainly seems to be a factor, at least in the short term. For the long term I think maybe not so much.
It is just one way of communication among the members, investors and traders. Right, you can tell whether the project is successful if their social media community is healthy, but there are also other measures. You can also look on charts for their token values, which you can relate to their demand.
An active telegram group with a large number of members shows how good the project with their marketing strategy, up shows how active the project community is.
Definetly not since many ICO's have telegram bounties where they encourage spamming. There is no way to measure how successful a ICO gonna be unfortunetly.
Interesting opinion. I had not paid attention to the activity of telegrams. In the future, I will use this method to find cool ico.
competant ico team.
I think Telegram is not a measure of ICO success though it is a great help of the team to communicate with the whole group. Aside from this, with Telegram, the members of the team will be updated about the project they are joining.
I think Telegram is not a measure of ICO success though it is a great help of the team to communicate with the whole group. Aside from this, with Telegram, the members of the team will be updated about the project they are joining.
The ICO of this project was very competently made, the advertisements of this project and their sales have been everywhere I think it is one of the most promising ICO this year.
For me telegram plays a huge part on making an ico successful. Telegram is a great way for members or potential investors and the people behind the ico to interact and discuss the project. I have joined a couple of ico and I think an active telegram channel is much more better than a dead one.
Telegram is a good channel to evaluate the ICO project community. But it's not all, it could be due to the bounty campaign and the project's airdrop too well. I evaluate the ICO project through some trustworthy sites like icobench.com as well as the amount of capital that the project has called.
It is a hard question, especially after the events in Russia which soon probbaly will to a block for its citizens. And that's not the first time it happened. Iran and couple more countries did something like that.
Telegram in my opinion is one way to announce a project development progress. And also telegram is one place to ask for everyone. Can be from the participants Bounty Campaign and also investors. Indeed Telegram is one way to succeed a project so I think telegram one of the success of ICO.
The success of Telegram fees depends directly on the fact that Pavel Durov is today a very famous person, who in turn is the head of this project, it turns out that people just trusted their investments to this guy.
No, Telegram member count is not a measure of success. Promoters can easily blow up a member count by unscrupulously adding Telegram users without their consent and sometimes people join because of the airdrops.
Everything in crypto is about the anonymity. It is very logical that telegram is important for crypto, because it is anonymous and easy to use. The groups in telegram are suitable for ICOs.
Jump to: