Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 19. (Read 5489 times)
In my opinion is just a hype created along telegram and this is nothing new as last years slack was on power now it's telegram and who knows what it will be next year so don't get to hyped of this telegram train as it boomed just because every crypto project is there.
I think it is a pointer to chances the ICO will be successful but it is only one element of the overall picture.
Some of the Telegram groups are bloated with bots and dead accounts there may be 50000 members in there but only 50 or 100 people actually communicating....
Some of the Telegram groups are bloated with bots and dead accounts there may be 50000 members in there but only 50 or 100 people actually communicating....
About the updates and the stuff - some of ICOs are just stating their effort that they have made on their website, not in the group, but it, as you said - has to be active.
I cannot think about it without having shivers on my spine. Telegram really can be a new era of economy right away!
That's not true, telegram is just a place of easy communication with some people wherever they are. Telegram users are also capable of being manipulated by multiple parties. They can at any time eliminate themselves from groups they make. Telegram is far from guaranteeing the success of an ico.
No questions. There are a lot of people in the telegram who understand this technology.
I think it depends on why there are so many cable members. I know that there are programs that launch the telegraph airdrops and a lot of fake followers, and we can see a lot of pointless discussions there.
As I know Telegram is one more social media platform to connect with investors and other traders as a way of communication. It is now really renown for many investors which is used in many countries of the world, and in some of them as in mine completely know about it. In Telegram, the members of the team will update about the project they are joining, thus, it must be a new measure for ICO now.
Such ambitious ICO is aimed at financing the development of the Telegram Open Network. Tokens will allow to make cheap payments in real time and eventually become the basis of a single platform for decentralized identification, storage, and so on.
But it can be noted that the alpha version of the future project is not ready yet. In addition, the principles of encryption are questioned by experts who are concerned about vulnerabilities in its technologies.
But it can be noted that the alpha version of the future project is not ready yet. In addition, the principles of encryption are questioned by experts who are concerned about vulnerabilities in its technologies.
It can be a measure of marketing success but not an entire project's success. That still rests on the hands of the founders and programmers of the team.
I tend to consider the size of project telegram group not as an indicator of success but as some necessary component of well-run ICO that expects to attract investor interest and reach hard cap. Actually, it is not only about size but also about quality of community, i.e. a project should have active community with many loyal members.
I always consider telegram group as one of factors that affect project success because telegram group represent the community that will support the project. But you should check whether the member in the group is real or they are just bot to boost the number. A real telgram group will have a lot of discussion even if the topic isn't revolve around the project.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Telegram is not the main point to become the ICO success, but it is the one of a good measure for ICO project because through this we can communicate to all members, investor and the official board of the project. With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
The best measure of ICO's success is a ready-made innovative product that improves public welfare. Telegram is just an application that helps to achieve this success.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I think Telegram can also contribute for the success of the ICO because Telegram can build a huge and active community that supports the project on which the team and investors are easily communicated by each other. But, We should not depend on the telegram number of followers always because it is important to always look for the project and the development team of it because it helps the ICO alot to become successful. With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
unfortunately telegram is always overrated for ico.
of course it's a good way to reach all users quickly but in my opinion the forum shouldn't have to suffer from it here. it currently does but again and again because infos can only be found in telegram.
of course it's a good way to reach all users quickly but in my opinion the forum shouldn't have to suffer from it here. it currently does but again and again because infos can only be found in telegram.
I think it is wrong to judge the quality of the project by the number of telegraph members only. Even if a bad project can get a large number of advocates through promotion, this has a certain effect, but it is not absolute.
Yes I think telegram can also be used as a benchmark of the success of an ICO. I think FB is now slowly already losing popularity (probably related to data theft). Through telegram we can monitor the activity of a community because I think the liveliness of the community will also facilitate and make a coin / tokens survive.
I don't believe the telegram can play a major role in a crypto developing. It's just a social media resource. If there's wouldn't be telegram something for sure would be instead.
An ICO can always run a telegram campaign so people will join but in reality only few of them are active. But, based on my observation, those ICO with a good number of telegram members are successful, so maybe it could be a good basis but we
have to do further research also as not this trend will succeed all the time.
I don't believe the telegram can play a major role in a crypto developing. It's just a social media resource. If there's wouldn't be telegram something for sure would be instead.
Jump to: