Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 2. (Read 5486 times)
success of an ICO is not only seen from telegram, but seen from a good ICO team in their marketing, but telegram is also a supporter for easy communication with investors, so between a good team and telegram communications help each other in the success of an ICO
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
In real and organic scenario the number of Telegram members is one of the measure of a ICO popularity.I have seen some ICOs opening second,third ,fourth telegram channels as they have reached max capacity on the main channel (max being 100k members).But now a days scammy ICOs are buying fake/paid telegram members to boost the member count.
I think that this is a very big mistake if you are trying to assess the success of projects by the number of people who are registered in the telegram-channel.
no.. telegram is just a group.. you can see the number of the member but you cannot sure if this all member are investor.. you can see the ico successful if they reached the soft cap.. telegram is not a base of success of ico.
Success no .. popularity yes. But that doesn't mean the price will moon and that you are able to buy low & sell high.
I think people are over with the telegram hype. It's a very cold bear period so their numbers does no even matter. Exceptional projects will work even they don't have a lot of members in their telegram. It's just been use to attract more investors and that's all.
Being a thousands of followers in telegram on a ICO project is better for them to attract more investors and contributors. But telegram is just one of the platforms that support the ICO. Like social media, blog and articles, bounties and more.
Yes, I agree here, diversifiying a marketing is a very good measure to make their own project more famous and attract new investors. For me it's most important all the channels are updated often enough so everyone can follow the progress. And an official Telegram update group, where you haven't to read all the spam questions.
Being a thousands of followers in telegram on a ICO project is better for them to attract more investors and contributors. But telegram is just one of the platforms that support the ICO. Like social media, blog and articles, bounties and more.
at this time telegram group from a crypto to me is no longer a measure of success where many fake telegram accounts, until at a certain time when crypto is listing in the market and needs a lot of votes, there will be clearly seen how many votes. many dev and project teams were initially very happy to see the development and enthusiasm of the telegram group but will feel sad the next few moments
ICOs nowadays use telegram groups to attract baby accounts that seems not good. I have seen many ICOs with plenty telegram members that barely had any investors. Those telegram members could've been gained by hosting an airdrop. Real investors should be wary of this.
not really, because most people are there for airdrops and there is a lot of bot accounts, etc.
I agree. Telegram is a good way to know how ICO project success.it can help spreading new ideas to many people.
but if I think that telegram is not necessarily a special benchmark for successful ico, telegram is only for communication media and the role for ico success is the marketing and concept of the project. in my opinion, bro
I think not. But telegrams are a factor to consider when choosing ico. The addition of professional telegram community managers also brings credibility and professionalism to the project. So, I also regularly monitor the telegram of the project before deciding on the investment.
I do not think so. Telegram can be a trap and it has never been a priority to evaluate the quality of an ico project. Essentials will be ideas, WP, devs team, advisor team and beta versions (if any).
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
by seeing a telegram that has more than 50k groups, I think it's a very good project because social media has a lot of followers and visits it With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Not really, Telegram is just a media channel like Facebook or Twitter, it does not evaluate whether ICO has succeeded or not, to know if a successful ICO or not based on many other factors
the creator of the telegram is a very smart person and this is not his first quality project. I am sure that he will do a good job and of course he will be successful. Many critics have already called his ICO one of the best this year
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Nope I don't think it determines the measures or how good an ico projects gonna be, most of the project out there right now are using airdrop to bring in more people into their group, and such airdrop reward can dump the token so hard
I do not thing so. Telegram channel can have a lot of subscribers, but they can be not active. And of course advitising campaign must be in all posible social media, including reddit, steemit, medium and ather. So if you need promotion in reddit you can buy upvotes on upvotes.io
I also think that the number of subscribers in telegram does not reflect the real state of affairs of the project. Projects need activity in all social media. Jump to: