Russia seems to be keep alternating between bans with the communist hive mind that anything they dont have under their boot is an enemy and the other extreme of promoting crypto envolvement as business growth. Perhaps they only wish to support alternatives to the dollar and they view Telegram as politically far too freedom orientated and diverse from the Russian national government interests.
Its sad to see as Russia is a country which needs to transition more then any of the Eastern European former USSR bloc countries away from the old fixed military based economy over to a technology developed and capable dynamic economy. Banning things outright that have no relation to illegal activity is pointless backwards thinking and Im wary of any country prone to this unilateral thinking
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 24. (Read 5484 times)
I don't think so in light of the fact that if a coin comes up short it's Telegram could in any case be enormous despite the fact that it's immaterial
Do you think that Russia ban is going to affect their ICO?
By the way, Russia's demands to provide access to PRIVATE conversations are 100% unconstitutional & borderline impossible (technically). Such a damn shame…
By the way, Russia's demands to provide access to PRIVATE conversations are 100% unconstitutional & borderline impossible (technically). Such a damn shame…
In my own opinion, I think telegram is just one criteria to know how successful an project is going to be.
I agree with you. Telegram is one of the factor that affect or contributed to the success of the project. Of course, the more people involve and active in telegram account, more people knows about the projects. This increases the probability of its success. Sometimes I use the the number of telegrams users before getting into the project. It's a good sign anyway.
It usually happens when something is distributed for free. But in such groups one garbage. A huge amount of stickers and spam. It seems to me that this is causing a negative for investors
Of course No. because telegram is not related to bring ICO’s in success.
In fact telegram is perfectly created and use for the communication process and purpose only, And it is not capable to measure the ICO’s success that why it is a No for me.
In fact telegram is perfectly created and use for the communication process and purpose only, And it is not capable to measure the ICO’s success that why it is a No for me.
elegram made easy business linkages. As a result of this. It has now been perceived that majority ICO currently are now dependent of Telegram for initializing, projecting and adequately actualizing their success dream.
elegram made easy business linkages. As a result of this. It has now been perceived that majority ICO currently are now dependent of Telegram for initializing, projecting and adequately actualizing their success dream.
Well, Telegram cannot be measure for ICO success. ICO success will be measured by the number of investors and the funds raised.
I don't measure telegram as their success. Because I have seen some ICO that has more than 20k telegram members but can't even reach a soft cap for their funding. While I see projects that has less than 5k than actually reach their desired funding soft cap or hard cap. It's too foolish to even consider an ICO potential success base on its telegram members. Investors should use their mind not their emotion on fear on missing out.
yes, i believe that.
More members in group and active conversation means the admin is pretty much monitoring all the time.
When admin is around and keep responding to members, that is somehow shows that the ICO was a success, because the admin is not backing out
More members in group and active conversation means the admin is pretty much monitoring all the time.
When admin is around and keep responding to members, that is somehow shows that the ICO was a success, because the admin is not backing out
Actually maybe not just almost every ICO but all ICO Projects. Telegram is very useful that makes each and everyone of us comfortable and easier to communicate those different ICO projects to be always update on their every announcements or some changes that may apply on their projects. Also, it gives those users to joined their telegram which to be part of their telegram campaign.
I agree, social networks are an important indicator of project success. Telegram is a very convenient platform for communicating with developers, to track updates, this is some indicator of people's interest in this project (and "level of hype" is an important indicator)
Telegram is not a criterion for showing ICO success. Of course, the number of members shows that the project is heard too. But there are groups that have earn too many members with fake airdrops. So only Telegram is not a healthy criterion.
Such a large-scale project was not yet in the history of the ICO, it is certainly a big step in the development of the crypto currency, and it is not surprising that many prophesy big profits for investors and there are plenty of reasons for this ...
Will for me yes. Before i invest into a Initial Coin Offering (ICO) ill make sure that there telegram have good volume of investor or a member.Because for me higher volume of investor big chances to success.
I think it affects, but indirectly. Because sometimes projects pay people for activity in the chat. Although usually it is noticeable. But we must look at everything in the complex. And this is still not a guarantee of success.
Telegram is another measure of a successful ICO but most of the telegram with large number of people is usually a scam now, most of them are Bot instead of investors who will invest in an ICOs, More so, bounty participant are also been the only people on some telegram which won't have positive impact in ICO success if the number of bounty is much higher than the the investors. But to be candid, telegram is use for measuring a successful ICO.
I think telegram cannot be measure of ICO success. You could not considered the number of participants in a telegram is the basis of success of an ICO. Because sometimes there are few members joined in telegram but the ICo success.
We know that telegram is one of the best way to interact people especially investors. But remember that not only the telegram is the only way to promote a projects of campaigns. On the other hand if an ICO are destined to become successful it really successful no matter what happens.
We know that telegram is one of the best way to interact people especially investors. But remember that not only the telegram is the only way to promote a projects of campaigns. On the other hand if an ICO are destined to become successful it really successful no matter what happens.
I'm not sure that telegrams are a good way to promote the project, in my opinion it's more like an information channel where you can ask questions and get answers, but in general, large investors are unlikely to sit in a telegram on one or another bounty channel. Yes, and the people in the telegram are typed through the iidrops or bounty of the company, which obliges you to subscribe, so the number of people is not an indicator.
Jump to: