Base on telegram channel, you can see their marketing team. How they answer all question, promote their project, and make sure for investor; they are one of indicator that the ICO is gonna be success or failed.
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 21. (Read 5486 times)
I don't think so, because many of the ICO project telegram people number of groups although many, but most look like fake accounts, because so many people in one group but just dozens of people chat one day.
It all depends, but in telegram you get many active supporters and also admins are much more active now in telegram groups than on this forum. I see many projects here that have no active admins at all after their icos conclude, but they are more active on telegram. Also many icos run airdrops in telegram so they get lots of new users coming for the airdrops, but then if they like the projects they invest in them as well, if they really become believers and liek the projects there. Telegram is becoming the go to meeting place for various coin supporters so that's quite an interesting development. Shame we couldn't invest in the telegram ICO because they made it a private sale for the whales only.
it is just one more social media platform to connect with investors and other traders .
it plays better role bcoz here admins can get interacted with people keen to invest in the project .
it plays better role bcoz here admins can get interacted with people keen to invest in the project .
Most of Telegram's members are robots, and spam is being published every day. I can't stand Telegram group. I've removed many groups.
I think that's not the fact that the telegram is always jammed with the chat, and so that it is interesting to find out there is a need to put efforts, the withdrawal of telegram is not so successful!
Yes, in addition to the telegram, I think the success of the ICO is influenced by many other factors. Sometimes I judge the success of an ICO project by twitter
Large chats in telegram are often bots or threaded users. Therefore, I do not pay attention to the number of participants. I'm more looking for team responses to questions from participants and updates on the project. It is also important to pay attention to other social networks - Twitter, FB, Medium.
sort of, but not all the time, because now a days almost telegram members are fake and most are from air-droppers and few numbers are concerned about the project plan about progressing state. much better to look hardly the project for future usage and can benefit for all of us.
No, very easy to get 50k subs by just having an airdrop.
For me Telegram is just one indicator. In General the use of Social Media is important for new Projekts but will Not guarantee the Success of the project. Most important will stay the roadmap and content the project itself is providing.
Before i invest into a Initial Coin Offering (ICO) ill make sure that there telegram have good volume of investor or a member.Because for me higher volume of investor big chances to success.
I don't think that the Telegram have been made the ICO. This offer is for a limited number of investors. This can be called not the sale of tokens, but the attraction of investments. Moreover, it is not yet known which product will make the Telegram and maybe it will be a failure.
Though it is just a social media, telegram connected people all over the world. It helps for the investors and developers to communicate for the welfare of all. I also set telegram as a standard for a successful ICO because yhe more people joined the telegram, the more it will is popular.
The telegram group is very important for community building, but many ICOs try to manipulate the numbers by ofering somthing just for joining, so is not always trustable.
I think it's just another popular social network. Only it is considered anonymous, which allows more people to participate in this.
Telegram only measure how many people are there in a community of an ICO, for me the measurement of ICO success is the number of tokens sold in their token sale.
Yes because community involvement can help spread the good news of the ICO. But I don't think of it 100% because i've been into one of the biggest ICO scam in history with a community members in their telegram channel that almost reach 70,000 members who joined. The project really looks promising but nobody really didn't know that it was just a scam.
This may well be, because as far as I know, Pavel was able to collect a very large amount of money, that public sales were not even needed, so I think that now we just have to wait until Pavel completes what he started very impulsively.
I think social media are the best ways to promote a project and get investors to invest in that project if they are well designed and well presented. Telegram as a social media platform is a way to promote a project and attract investors because it is used globally. It is easy to access and you only need to post the project in the groups you are into and you get peoples opinion about the work. You can connect easily with as much people as you want on this platform.
Jump to: