Topic: Is the government can really make a way to end poverty or it depends on us? - page 4. (Read 1810 times)

They won't go away, because people tend to see things in binary positions. If there are rich, then there will be definitely poor. Even if these poor will be incomparably better off in the future compared to the poor now. This is one reason. And the other is that some people are actually comfortable being poor. This is an excuse for absolutely everything that can go wrong and fail in life. Many questions that require thinking and creativity are not raised at all. Much less responsibility must be borne. And people, in fact, get used to this state. It becomes much easier for them to dream about changing something, so that their life becomes better and more secure, but they do not do it, because it is very difficult.

Equalizing employment opportunities and determining minimum wages will also greatly influence the economy in a country, it will also reduce poverty levels. When world economic conditions are uncertain, the government must think about very urgent matters in society. I am also sure that the government has taken various ways to improve the welfare of its people, even though they are not perfect.

If the unemployment rate continues to increase, it will add to other problems which will also worsen the economic situation. The high rate of inflation and the increasing number of unemployed will have an impact on negative things, for example there will be a high crime rate and of course everyone will not want that to happen. Therefore, the government must be really detailed in looking at the turmoil and activities of its people, so that if there is assistance from the government, it is truly targeted at the beneficiaries.

Sadly the poor will always be with us.

please note 🗒️ this idea above is as old as christ himself

and i paraphrased it as I don’t
know  the exact bible quote.

I grew up in New York City and saw tens of thousands of
poor homeless people  . I am in a less crowded spot now but there are dozens of homeless near my area.

I have witnessed to poor in every state in the usa i visited. say 25 states.

I have seen poor people in every asian country I have been in.

so i simply think they will not go away.

If the government were able to keep corruption under control, then surely it can make the country free from poverty. Accumulation of wealth and development of particular regions of the nation is a major problem which creates opportunity for specific people and the rest gets ignored. When this gets overcome by the policies framed by the government, automatically scenario will change. Maybe this will be quite complicated at the beginning and things will change gradually.

In the traditional capitalist system, there must be different social classes, one of which is always in need of the other. The rich need the poor to do work for them and the poor need to work to survive. This means that the system (which is ruled by the wealthy class, of course) is always in need of “poverty” as a system of living that includes classes below it to maintain its control. The poor in the capitalist system are an evolved image of the slaves of antiquity and feudalism.
With the development of the capitalist system, countries emerged in which all citizens had a good standard of living, if not everyone was wealthy. This requires that there be poor countries that are exhausted to achieve this level.

The government can guide and help its constituents and elevate the status of its citizen by providing opportunities to people.  The government can also help its people by providing free education eliminating illiteracy among its people.  The government only provides possible solutions but the people should be actively participating in these activities.  In short, ending poverty is possible if the government and its people work hand in hand.

One of the government's efforts to overcome poverty is by providing general education and training to the community itself. So that people have their own skills to run independent businesses when there are not enough job vacancies for the community. And after people have the skills to open independent businesses, then the government will provide capital assistance to open businesses for people who really need business capital. Well, a program like this has been carried out by the government in my country since before the Covid19 virus came to my country. At that time the government was intensively developing entrepreneurship in my country. And at that time, even every young person who had just finished school could immediately get skills training in the world of work that he was interested in through an application launched by the government called Prakerja. And this method was actually very effective at that time in my country. But then Covid-19 came and destroyed people's entrepreneurship. As a result, the government's corrective steps have been set back. Because many people used business capital during the Covid 19 pandemic to survive. And when the pandemic is over they won't have the capital to open their business again.

So the point is that a government can indeed help solve the problem of poverty, although not in its totality. It's just that sometimes there are obstacles that make the government fail to carry out its programs. Because this was already done in my country before the pandemic came. But after the pandemic came and then it was over. Now everything is back to square one.

No any nation will say they don't forseen the increase in population of their on country just that they don't care about us, why is census taking place is it no the way each nation know their population. Government can't take away poverty but they can reduce unemployment by introducing a practical entrepreneurship course in our institution, then people will realized that there is no job out side and this alone can motivate them to pay more attention on the course. With a structure like government will be able to reduce unemployment, this is what the government can do and can not eradicate poverty completely.

Per capita income is usually used to determine the level of unemployment in a country or the level of poverty in a country. If the population increases every year by a certain amount, then the per capita income will decrease every year, as a result of which a country will never be able to come out of poverty. It is a big problem that people depend only for jobs, after completing education, they should try to do something by themselves instead of depending on jobs. When I can do something myself, I can introduce myself as an entrepreneur to others. If everyone tries to do something on their own, the pressure on the job market will be reduced so that those who remain will get jobs and a country will prosper economically.

Unemployment is not a cause, it's a consequence of problems. And the problems are quite different. From what I observe, in many countries, the main problems are several:
- Inept governance. This is solved quite simply by changing governments and state managers.
- Totalitarian regimes. Very difficult to change.
- Corruption. Also very difficult to solve.

The unemployment was considered one of the most important one,because the populated country will have huge population.The government will have stable income,if the population keep increasing means.The government can’t able to manage the economy and the population which leads to the unemployment.So the people should take care of themselves.The people should work and get some money from it,only by this way poverty can be eradicated from their society.Every individual should work for the money.

To eliminate poverty in the country, unemployment must be eliminated first. I don't think there will be a problem of poverty if everyone gets a chance to work according to their own merit. In every country there are many such students who are unemployed after completing their graduation. If a student who is unemployed after completing graduation gets employment then he can help his family a lot financially and his family will slowly rise from below the poverty line but unemployment is a big problem in today's world. While there is ample employment in developed countries, unemployment is a major problem in developing countries. Increasing the education rate is of no use if the government cannot guarantee employment to those people. Plan to eliminate unemployment before eliminating poverty and you will see that poverty is eliminated.

I agree with you when you emphasize the role of education in helping us escape poverty. But there is a problem that I see today: many families are so poor that they do not have enough food to eat, and in that situation, education cannot be more important than food. This happens because some governments do not introduce any policies to improve the lives of the poor, the lowest stratum of society. Many children dream of going to school, but because their families are too poor, they cannot go to school hungry and there is no free school if they don't have money. Whether we are rich or poor depends on ourselves, but the government also bears much of the responsibility if poverty occurs on a large scale in the country.

There is no advantage only in blaming the government. The government of a country always wants to develop its country. How the people of his country can get better services and live a better life is considered as one of the main tasks of the government of every country.
We should remember that the more active people are in the country, the government will be more stronger. The government depends on the people. If the people help their government then that government can be most powerful. Every country's government has a financial constraint. The head of government has to manage the country by considering the income and expenditure aspect. The more private companies are created in a country, the government will be more financially prosperous of that particular country. Therefore, if the people can not depend on the government but develop themselves, the country will move forward quickly.

The main cause is the increasing population but they have no interest in getting education as well as in finding a job. Because of this increase in population the number of agricultural land decrease as they went to those areas to occupying their living place.

Some individuals do not go to school for getting education while some of them are getting education but the have no abilities to use their skills in order to be involved in any field for earning. As the cultured land is not enough so there are also less amount of resources which will have massive effects on the health of individuals so if their health is not well they will also be not take part in stabilizing their economic situations.

Different country have their people will different rights in my country we are in the era where people have the rights to vote to their government officials but as always there's a history of family matters so they keep voting those people some of the votes can be bought due to being poor, to those people who want to fight fair other people who have power doing all the things just to be part of the government, if the government will become clean and really have a good ways manage the community or even the country the community will not be suffer. Just having a good leader makes the country become sufficient and there's no poverty.

Yes, poverty is really noticeable and evident in Asian countries compare to western countries. I think poverty in Asian region can be associated with only having less access to education which hinders people from getting out of poverty. One of the possible reasons for this can also be about less job opportunities. Since they have only gotten little to no education at all, they find it difficult to find a job. As what we can see, everything is interconnected and one factor may affect all the other aspects that's why it's hard to totally eradicate poverty.

In my own perspective, we cannot really end poverty but we can at least try to minimize it. And in order for that to happen, the government, together with its citizen, should work hand in hand because I believe that it is our shared responsibility and a shared effort to reduce the cases of poverty.

 

The level of educational equality is very important for the progress of a country. And an even level of education in society can also increase the opportunity to move a country towards a more developed country. It's just that getting a decent education also requires quite a large amount of capital in some countries. So there must be a government contribution in this case, such as making education fees free for the community. And after that the government needs to build awareness of the importance of education. Because in developed countries the level of education of the people is much higher. Meanwhile in developing countries. Indeed, there are still many areas that have not even been reached by technological advances. And there are still few school buildings. So many school children even have to travel kilometers to get to school. This makes some children even give up going to school.

This division that you make is too coarse. Western countries can mean the USA, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland, and can also mean Greece, Italy, Argentina, and Mexico. The economical, political, social, and educational situation in these Western countries is very different. You cannot compare Greece and Canada and say that the situation with poverty and education is equally better there than in Eastern countries. Not to mention the fact that within each of these countries the situation is also very different, depending on the region and social stratum of the population.

Just as the Eastern countries and even East Asian countries (you use two terms and I think they were East Asian countries used as synonyms) are far from homogeneous. There are countries of Eastern Europe, such as Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, and there are China and Japan. There is no way to say that education is worse in these countries. But the economic situation depends not only on what kind of education people have now. But also on the historical conditions that prevailed in these countries, and the consequences of which they are now experiencing, depending on them. Suffice it to say about the socialist past of the countries of the former Soviet bloc and the communist present of China. These factors cannot be corrected with seminars alone.

Poverty is a big problem of every country. In East Asian countries, poverty ratio is greater than in West countries. Poverty can be end by education.In East countries, there is no awareness, there is illiteracy and people give birth to more child than they afford. If organizations will organize seminars then poverty ratio will be minimum. Poverty is created by people own. If people will think that we have these resources and we have to  educate those people who we have, then their decisions will be better and they will contribute in economy of country. If public will be happy, government will be also happy. Public should give skills to child, in this way they will be successful in life if they will have working habits. Habits decides the future, they will be mature at early age and will take decisions correctly. When they will sit in the company of businessman they will become a business.