Pages:
Author

Topic: Is Your Money Safer In Crypto than at the Bank? - page 54. (Read 9898 times)

member
Activity: 336
Merit: 12
I ts very difiicult question and i dont think anyone could answer it pefectly but as we all know from 2008 and ealrlier people lost everything just in one day like if they were lost thier private key from wallet i think ,crypto will be much more safer one day.

I think cryptocurrency won't ever be safer perhaps only after many decades when the technology is connected with biology, and digital codes are embedded in the human DNA. Nowadays we use keys which can be lost or forbidden or stolen by hacks. Even large exchanges such as Binance suffer from hacker attacks.
member
Activity: 712
Merit: 15
SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE
The safety of your money in this post depends on what you desire. If you are referring to security then your money is safer and easily accessible in the bank than in cryptos. But if you are referring to which is more profitable to keep your money then crypto is the best because you can make a whole lot of profit from it.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
if we talking about security then it will be safer stored in the bank, because, in the bank, there are guarantees from the state about our money,
whereas in crypto there is no guarantee our money will be safe.
but if we talking about crypto is everything about investment, our money/assets will grow as long as the development of crypto capitalization. but if in the bank, our money cannot grow significantly, only from interest.

newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
According of my knowledge, I suppose  banks are the most secure place to spare cash, on the grounds that the quantity of robberies in banks is little. in any case, on the off chance that you need to twofold your cash with a bigger esteem, crypto is the place to duplicate it! however, here there is no certification.
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
Of course I love cryptocurrencies, but I believe that while the bank is much more reliable right now. So there's a lower percentage rate.
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 124
hard question. if the bank is a governmental bank and you live in a strong europian country your money is very safe in that bank. but crypto wallets are also  very safe if you use paper wallets or hardware wallets.
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
It is obvious that the main purpose of banks is to store money safely.
And crypto is an assent similar to known financial instruments.
For banks, the main purpose is not to keep money, but to take possession. Your money is never stored in the Bank, they always work, sometimes in the negative, sometimes in the plus. And you get your money back at the expense of others. It's like a pyramid scheme, only here money is forced to work to pay off customers. And swift helps to be flexible with 1-3% interest rate on loans.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 14
It is obvious that the main purpose of banks is to store money safely.
And crypto is an asset similar to known financial instruments.
jr. member
Activity: 344
Merit: 1
To be candid, it is better to save your money in the bank, very safe there, I would only say if u have crypto with u, u will be able to make more money over time with it compared to when it is just in the bank..... For safety  I believe it is more safe in the bank
newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
Yeah it safe enough to have your asset in crypto, but there some risk you need to consider before move your fiat into crptocurrency, the value is not stable today you buy it at 100 usd tomorrow it can be 10. And you better ready if that happend or youll be broke af.

For me better not to put all your money in crypto. For now it still so risky its good if you leave some percent of your savings in bank at least there its secure. In crypto in case it will suddenly collapse nowhere to find complain and its difficult to get your money back.
full member
Activity: 453
Merit: 100
Meh, I rather have all in crypto, I hate banks and their agenda, like:  - Supporting wars, So don't get me started with that they print it however much they like
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
Tim Draper: More Secure in Bitcoin Than the Money Sitting in Wells Fargo

Venture capitalist Tim Draper is bullish on Bitcoin and believes it will reach $250,000 in the next four years.

During a debate hosted by Intelligence Squared and the Adam Smith Society, Tim Draper was asked how Bitcoin compared with his previous tech investments in Hotmail, Skype, and Tesla. He replied bullishly, saying, “Bitcoin will be bigger than all three combined.” However, Draper didn’t leave it at that — he thinks it will be bigger than the iron age, the Renaissance, and the internet and says that the nascent technology will affect the entire world in a faster and more prevalent way than ever imagined.

The Debate: “Bitcoin is more than a bubble and here to stay.”
Backed up by Patrick Byrne (CEO of overstock), Draper took on Financial Times journalist, Gillian Tett, and Professor of Law, Eric Posner, both of whom argued that Bitcoin is indeed a bubble and strongly contested Draper’s claims. Posner and Tett called into question the “strengths” of Bitcoin, arguing that they could be regarded as weaknesses. Posner suggested that the pseudonymization of identity enabled by the technology makes Bitcoin transactions the perfect vehicle for sophisticated criminal transactions. Tett focused on the risk involved with trusting computers with finance as they can be hacked, are prone to faults, and that Bitcoin is a “terrible store of value.”

These arguments won’t be anything new to anyone who has studied the space, and the rebuttals of Draper and Byrne won’t come as a surprise either. The pair acknowledged that Bitcoin was imperfect and drew attention to the fact the technology was designed to be open source so that unforeseen problems can be managed by the community. Byrne also pointed out that although Bitcoin has been “hacked at” more than anything in history, but unlike banks, it has yet to be defeated.

Draper was more brazen in his responses and implored the crowd to use fiat if they were looking to facilitate their own criminal activity as many Bitcoin criminals get caught. The venture capitalist responded to Tett’s admission that she invests in several different fiat currencies by saying, “I’m so much more secure in my Bitcoin than I am in the money that’s sitting there in Wells Fargo.”

Who is right?
The short answer is it’s far too early to tell, but it is good to see the subject being discussed in this manner. Before the debate, Gillian Tett remarked that if both sides of an argument aren’t heard in the same room, on the same day, then the conversations can “go past one another.” It’s probably safe to say she’s right here because, although there is no shortage of media on either side of the argument, real debate on the subject can be difficult to find.

If crypto is going to head down the road Draper expects, its advocates need to be able to argue their case outside of the crypto community, and debate should be welcome as it not only gives both sides the ability to speak but also the ability to listen.

Draper’s comments are to be expected
As crypto enthusiasts, it’s easy to agree when figures like Draper sing the praises of Bitcoin, but we shouldn’t let confirmation bias get in the way of the issues. Draper is a successful investor, and he hasn’t arrived there without making mistakes. He could be wholly right, wrong, or somewhere in between — the latter is most likely. Draper allegedly owns 30,000 BTC, so he has a vested interest in Bitcoin’s success. That does not mean he is wrong, but it does mean his comments should be taken with a pinch of salt. Well-reasoned arguments are far more convincing than hype and chest beating because they allow people to make up their own minds.

The emergence of DLT might eclipse the impact of other innovations, but for now, the emphasis is not on critics to prove the crypto community wrong. It’s up to those who champion DLT to convince the world they’re right.

Originally published at cryptodisrupt.com

Of course, it is safer to store money in a Bank than in a cryptocurrency. Perhaps over time the situation will change. However, at the moment, cryptocurrencies are a very volatile tool and this makes it possible to quickly get a big profit. However, at the same time, the risks of investment loss increase very much.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
both are the twin, reckoning on our consignment, reason I conjecture consignment, seeing both are both stored in the doublespeak, is sheltered, of degree safe however the conceivability of both as well be taken, how hacks be smarter, exclusive when we save in our protection bank more guaranteed.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
No doubt it sufficiently safe to have your benefit in crypto, yet there some hazard you have to consider before move your fiat into crptocurrency, the esteem isn't steady today you get it at 100 usd tomorrow it can be 10. Furthermore, you better prepared if that happend or youll be down and out af.
jr. member
Activity: 184
Merit: 2
In fact, it can not be said that it is safer to keep money in the crypto or it is safer to keep money in the bank. Both the bank and the crypto are insecure. Risks are everywhere, even in real estate. In this world you can not be sure of at all anything.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 114
Of course not. But the bank will not give such income, in case of success. The bank deposit is a very passive, minimum and long-term income. But if there is no certainty and acceptance of risks, then this is also a good option, provided that the deposit insurance will give safer at times.
Well, do not forget about the goals. Well, cryptocurrency is not excluding the holding of any money asset in bank.
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
Bank will be the safer place if we compare it with crypto. But in bank, the chance to get massive profit won't be exist.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 266
> CAMPAIGN MANAGER < https://t.me/TheAndy500
In some part of course yes cause there you decide what will be done with it and you could always make decisions if you want to withdraw, use, transfer to different coin or other things. So for me it could be safer.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
In my own opinion is safer in cryptocurrency in terms of money than at the bank because the cryptocurrency industry is the safest but if you hold a big money, I think its much safer to put it on the bank. Because when you invest it into a crypto, there is a risk factor, there is a much chance that by just holding on it, you already gain profit.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 3
Definitely not. What is in your bank is your real money. In crypto u can loose 30% overnight because of the excessive fluctuation. Crypto is just investment, not the holding for your all money.
Pages:
Jump to: