I’d suggest the fact that the Allies demonstrated a pretty clear resolve that killing civilians to achieve victory was acceptable is the entire reason why World War II was so successful while Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were not. Perhaps if America had opened up the war by turning Kandahar into a firestorm like Dresden, it would have sent a clearer message of what the price of attacking America is.
this is completely off topic and complete garbage.
Frankly I find the suggestion that Genocide is a solution to be very offensive.
WWII was resolved with finality because there were only 2 empires that controlled half of the world.
German and Japan..
both Germany and Japan were controlled from the top, they were both dictatorships with rigid hierarchies so once you removed the will to fight from the top the war was over.
This is not how insurgencies and guerrilla wars like vietnam and afghanistan operate.
the power structure is divided into cells there is no central control.
the Americans did try scorched earth in vietnam and it failed. it failed because it only fuelled the resolve of people of Vietnam to resist the invasion. and by the way Vietnam never attacked america.. they had no business being there at all..
movements like Hamas and now the problems in Fundamentalists in Iraq are like Hydras.. you cut off one head and another one grows.
it doesn't matter how many people you kill the more violent path is always doomed to fail because the more innocents you kill the more it turns the people against you and the people are the ones providing the soldiers not the military.
frankly Isreal are recklessly ignorant for not knowing this... but then again.. most right wing politicians are.. they stoke war because it is the warmongers that vote for them in the elections.
the way to deal with any insurgency is to convince the insurgents that life is better on your side.
this is how Communist Vietnam while having defeated the USA was actually eventually won over by them in the end.
this is how china and russia moved away from stalinism to embrace the free market.
the cold war was won with carrots not with sticks. The russians knew that they couldn't keep building weapons as their standard of living was declining.. and the Chinese knew they were falling behind economically.
if the Irealis really wanted lasting peace then they would help the people of gaza.. and I mean genuinely help the people.. but they do not want lasting peace they just want status quo. Which is: a state of the jews, for the jews and encompassing all the lands that were once held by jews 2000 years ago. they don't want Palestinians to come and live with them as equals with full equal rights and they don't want to give up the settlements in the west bank... neither of those options is acceptable to the Zionist movement. An Isreal where the jews are in the minority is unthinkable and so is an isreal on only half of gods land.
Isreal has no carrot to give the Palestinians that is why they always use the stick.
and this is why they will eventually lose.
because what they are doing is immoral, unjust, unethical and unsustainable.
as for Hamas, they will lose too for the same reasons.