Pages:
Author

Topic: Israel: Operation Protective Edge - page 20. (Read 14685 times)

member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
July 24, 2014, 03:12:02 PM
when there is bad news for bitcoin, it will become headlines in the mainstream media around the world; when there is good news for bitcoin, the mainstream media keep quiet
until today, many ignorant people still think bitcoin had gone bankrupt when mtgox collapse

wake up people, don't trust everything you read in the mainstream media
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
July 24, 2014, 02:57:41 PM
History of the Israeli Palestinian Conflict

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Q_8ZrYku4
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 09:31:44 PM
U.N.: 1 child killed in Gaza every hour
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/palestinian-child-killed-every-2-hours-in-gaza-un-israel-hamas

Quote
Last Updated Jul 23, 2014 1:00 PM EDT

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip -- Israeli troops battled Hamas militants on Wednesday near a southern Gaza Strip town as the U.S. secretary of state flew into Israel to press top-gear efforts for a truce in the conflict that has so far killed at least 657 Palestinians and 31 Israelis.

Neither side appeared to be backing down, after Palestinian rocket fire led several international airlines to cancel flights to Tel Aviv and Israeli troops clashed with Hamas near the Gaza town of Khan Younis in heavy fighting that forced dozens of families to flee. Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal later demanded Gaza's borders be open and an end to the blockade against it, calling Palestinians "the true owners of the land."

Trapped by the fighting in Khan Younis, a town on the southern edge of the Gaza Strip, dozens of Palestinian families scrambled to flee the area.
 
John Kerry landed in Tel Aviv despite a Federal Aviation Administration ban following a Hamas rocket near the airport the day before, reflecting his determination to achieve a cease-fire agreement between the warring sides as international organizations, the United Nations and the U.S. government expressed mounting concern over the toll on Palestinian civilians.

"One child has been killed in Gaza every hour for the past two days," said a statement released Wednesday by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

According to OCHA, "a request for a humanitarian pause has been rejected by the Israeli authorities."

(...)
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 102
July 23, 2014, 08:55:14 PM
w?
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
July 23, 2014, 05:06:22 PM
Jihadi cleric calls for Muslim fighters to join the fighting in Gaza By ARIEL BEN SOLOMON

"Our heart yearns to arrive and fight the sons and brothers of the apes and pigs," says rebel fighter. isis caliphate

Quote
“Oh our brothers in Gaza, know that you are fighting an enemy following Satan’s path, whereas you are fighting in the way of [Allah] the merciful,” Maqdisi said.

He added that he and his fighters want to join the fighting in Gaza.

“True, we are fighting in Syria, but our heart yearns to arrive and fight the sons and brothers of the apes and pigs [the Jews],” MEMRI reported Maqdisi as saying The jihadi cleric said that Gazans must be patient and wait for either victory or martyrdom, adding that Allah will soon send “extraordinary soldiers who will fight and defeat the Jews.”

“The days of defeats have passed. Our concept today is offensive and therefore you must attack them [the Jews] so they won’t attack you, hold on, fortify yourself and trust in Allah so you may succeed,” Maqdisi said.

He threatened Israel, stating that the Jews will not be able to sleep because of the sounds of artillery, and that soldiers will reach and destroy them.

Calling on Muslims to help the struggle in Gaza, he said, “If you help them, Allah will help you, if you abandon them, Allah will abandon you. The choice is yours because on Judgment Day they will ask you did you help the Gazans or the men of al-Sham or not.”

http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Jihadi-cleric-calls-for-Muslim-fighters-to-join-the-fighting-in-Gaza-368628
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
July 23, 2014, 04:59:51 PM
Quote
World suspension of Israel flights a 'great victory': Hamas

Gaza City (Palestinian Territories) (AFP) - Hamas said Wednesday that the suspension of international flights to and from Israel over security concerns about Gaza rocket fire was a "great victory."

"The success of Hamas in closing Israeli airspace is a great victory for the resistance, and is the crown of Israel's failure," Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said in a statement.

A rocket fired from the embattled Palestinian territory hit near Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport on Tuesday, prompting US and European airlines to suspend all flights to and from the Jewish state.

The flight ban was still in place on Wednesday, as Israel bombarded Gaza for a 16th straight day in an operation to stop rocket fire and destroy tunnels constructed by Hamas, the main power in the territory.

More and video...http://news.yahoo.com/world-suspension-israel-flights-great-victory-hamas-161508458.html
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 12:09:49 PM

I’d suggest the fact that the Allies demonstrated a pretty clear resolve that killing civilians to achieve victory was acceptable is the entire reason why World War II was so successful while Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were not. Perhaps if America had opened up the war by turning Kandahar into a firestorm like Dresden, it would have sent a clearer message of what the price of attacking America is.

this is completely off topic and complete garbage.
Frankly I find the suggestion that Genocide is a solution to be very offensive.

WWII was resolved with finality because there were only 2 empires that controlled half of the world.
German and Japan..

both Germany and Japan were controlled from the top, they were both dictatorships with rigid hierarchies so once you removed the will to fight from the top the war was over.

This is not how insurgencies and guerrilla wars like vietnam and afghanistan operate.
the power structure is divided into cells there is no central control.

the Americans did try scorched earth in vietnam and it failed. it failed because it only fuelled the resolve of people of Vietnam to resist the invasion. and by the way Vietnam never attacked america.. they had no business being there at all..

movements like Hamas and now the problems in Fundamentalists in Iraq are like Hydras.. you cut off one head and another one grows.
it doesn't matter how many people you kill the more violent path is always doomed to fail because the more innocents you kill the more it turns the people against you and the people are the ones providing the soldiers not the military.

frankly Isreal are recklessly ignorant for not knowing this... but then again.. most right wing politicians are.. they stoke war because it is the warmongers that vote for them in the elections.

the way to deal with any insurgency is to convince the insurgents that life is better on your side.
this is how Communist Vietnam while having defeated the USA was actually eventually won over by them in the end.

this is how china and russia moved away from stalinism to embrace the free market.
the cold war was won with carrots not with sticks. The russians knew that they couldn't keep building weapons as their standard of living was declining.. and the Chinese knew they were falling behind economically.

if the Irealis really wanted lasting peace then they would help the people of gaza.. and I mean genuinely help the people.. but they do not want lasting peace they just want status quo. Which is: a state of the jews, for the jews and encompassing all the lands that were once held by jews 2000 years ago. they don't want Palestinians to come and live with them as equals with full equal rights and they don't want to give up the settlements in the west bank... neither of those options is acceptable to the Zionist movement.  An Isreal where the jews are in the minority is unthinkable and so is an isreal on only half of gods land.

Isreal has no carrot to give the Palestinians that is why they always use the stick.
and this is why they will eventually lose.

because what they are doing is immoral, unjust, unethical and unsustainable.
as for Hamas, they will lose too for the same reasons.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
July 23, 2014, 12:04:43 PM
Not really. You can fight an insurgency with the same weapons one would use in a conventional war. Russia did so quite nicely in Chechnya by using massive conventional firepower on Grozny and other insurgent-held, civilian-populated targets. Indeed, the sheer indiscriminate nature, destruction, and terror imposed on the civilian population helps to deter their resistance.

And the Groznyy bombing was a complete failure. Ordered by that drunkard Yeltsin, the bombings killed tens of thousands of civilians, most of whom were ethnic Russians with anti-separatist leanings (esp. children and the elderly). One of the reasons why more than 75% of those killed during the Chechen wars were ethnic Russians.

The bombings had no effect on the rebels, as very few ethnic Chechens died during that.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 11:36:15 AM
Quote
Seems a bit disingenuous to compare a formal war with an insurgency and terrorist related violence. The two aren't fought in the same way. Nor are they fought with the same weapons. You're stuck on WWII but it isn't the 40's anymore.
Not really. You can fight an insurgency with the same weapons one would use in a conventional war. Russia did so quite nicely in Chechnya by using massive conventional firepower on Grozny and other insurgent-held, civilian-populated targets. Indeed, the sheer indiscriminate nature, destruction, and terror imposed on the civilian population helps to deter their resistance.

I’d suggest the fact that the Allies demonstrated a pretty clear resolve that killing civilians to achieve victory was acceptable is the entire reason why World War II was so successful while Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were not. Perhaps if America had opened up the war by turning Kandahar into a firestorm like Dresden, it would have sent a clearer message of what the price of attacking America is.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 11:08:43 AM
Quote
Hasn't worked too well in over 50 years, seems like a new tactic should be called for.

And your grand strategy for conflict has already been utilized over the course of decades in the Sudan, probably to the best that anyone could hope to realistically utilize it. Bashir literally got away with genocide and ethnic cleansing and has been since 1989. And it has completely failed him. Sure he has been able to stay in power, but he lost the southern half of his country, and is losing control of a half dozen other internal states as well.

It simply doesn't work; and now when Bashir has tried to backtrack he's found the SPLM-N announce today that it is joining forced with the Janjaweed against Khartoum. He ended up losing control of his own monsters.

You also mentioned Sri Lanka? That ended, but it took 26 years. Not really a big win, and even now the harshness of how it ended is causing domestic problems. In fact there were warnings of rising extremism just today within Sri Lanka over clashes which have threatened the country with renewed instability.
It took 26 years because they kept getting distracted by Western bleeding hearts forcing them into peace talks. When they finally decided to just crush the Tamils, it worked fairly quickly. Sudan doesn’t have anything remotely close to Israel’s overwhelming conventional force either, so it’s a bad example.

You can’t realistically hope to stop insurgencies by providing a “legitimate alternative.” It’s basically never worked in a situation like Israel-Palestine. OTOH, the brute force method worked well in the North Caucasus in the 1940s and has been a lot more effective at pacifying Chechnya compared to American efforts in Afghanistan. It also did pretty well in 1991 when Saddam crushed Shia uprisings against his rule that, at their peak, caused him to lose control of the vast majority of Iraq.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 11:06:39 AM

Personally, I’d be far less restrained than the Israelis were being if insurgents in some neighboring country were firing rockets at mine.


that's just it.. they aren't in a neighboring country Isreal / Palestine is the same land and the same country.

If one day you were happily sitting in your house and someone came along at gun point and forced you and your family onto the street.. what would you do? stand there and hold up a sign saying "can I have my house back please?"... even if you did that.. could you do it for 50 years?

Now clearly the violence is not getting anyone anywhere but you cant really blame them for being frustrated considering they have been forced to live blockaded and surrounded on all sides by walls, fences and guns pointed at them.

its not like they have a choice to leave. Its not like they can tell the extremists in their group to "go away".. its not like they can store their weapons "away from civilians" they are all locked in together in a very densely packed tight space.

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 10:55:00 AM
Quote
It is largely Jihadi Salafi groups firing the rockets, groups that are actually opposed to Hamas, which is why it is easier to recognize the overzealous targeting of Hamas in the campaign. the same was true of their search for and accusations surrounding the missing students which third party groups claimed responsibility for, but which Netanyahu took the opportunity to blame on Hamas instead and used it as a justification to illegally harass and target Hamas affiliates.
Easy. Because these Salafist groups are operating because of either the incompetence of Hamas, or their weakness, and because of the acquiescence or support of the civilian population.
Collective responsibility merits collective punishment. Gaza's population supported Hamas, and acquiesces to, if not outright supports the Salafists. It makes absolute sense to hold them collectively responsible for allowing terrorists to operate amongst them.

There's never been a good example of an occupying force succeeding with a population-centric counter insurgency strategy. The most successful examples of crushing insurgencies, like Sri Lanka, involved a willingness to use violence and force to achieve victory.
You're contradicting yourself here, Salafists tend to hate the Muslim Brotherhood. Claiming that the Gazan population loves both the Salafists and Hamas doesn't make any sense. It's also dumb to assume that just because a group operates within a territory that 1.) the government likes them and 2.) that the population likes them. I'm pretty sure that the people who suffer from Mayi Mayi attacks in the DRC don't do so with smiles. Nor does it make sense to bomb government forces that are aligned against them if your goal is to see them destroyed. It's pretty dumb to bomb Kinshasa and kill their soldiers while asking them why they aren't able to kill off the M23 rebels.
Collective responsibility merits collective punishment. Gaza's population supported Hamas, and acquiesces to, if not outright supports the Salafists. It makes absolute sense to hold them collectively responsible for allowing terrorists to operate amongst them.

Of course using collective punishment like that in the Congo is stupid. It would be stupid to kill civilians in Herat or other non-Pashtun regions of Afghanistan in response to the Taliban’s insurgency for the same reason. In either case, they’re far removed from the conflict and don’t really have the ability to intervene.

In contrast, the Salafists are operating amongst civilians in Gaza. The civilians aren’t making any serious attempt to stop them and in all probability, are actively aiding them. If the M23 were getting support from particular villages, then it would make sense to target those civilians. Similarly, Pashtun villages that collaborate with insurgents should be demolished by carpet bombing. Gaza’s civilians must be taught to stop supporting people who attack Israel, so it makes sense to collectively punish them.

Personally, I’d be far less restrained than the Israelis were being if insurgents in some neighboring country were firing rockets at mine.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 441
July 23, 2014, 10:51:50 AM
so one conceptual thing i don't totally understand. if israel in some sense stole the lands from the palestinians, didn't the palestinians steal the land from the romans, who stole the land from the greeks, who stole the land from the persians, who stole the land from the babylonians, who stole the land from the assyrians, who stole the land from the jews? i don't understand why the "right" to the land started arbitrarily at one point in time (so the argument seems to me to go).
'palestinians' are a new creation/fabrication.

A weapon to use against Israel.

They are Arabs.

If you look at their surnames, many of them betray their origin. Far from being a 'palestinan' people, one of the most common names in Gaza is "Al-Masri" which means "The Egyptian".
By this logic since Israelis are mostly Russian and Polish and should be summarily sent back to their countries of origin.
Ignorant biased comment
200 Palestinians killed -> Human shields, missiles hidden in their houses
2 Israeli soldiers killed -> War crime
Half of Israel's six million Jews are from North Africa, Southwest Asia, and Ethiopia. The other three million are Eastern European.

I just had to clarify this.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 10:44:11 AM

Not a single coin, clay pot - nothing points to a 'palestinian' people.


there is so much archaeological evidence for the  philistines / Palestinians.. that its not funny.
its even written in the old testiment and the jewish version too.

Isreali archaeologists lead the way when it comes to philistine archaeology.

its like saying that the Canaanites and phonecians didn't exist either.
how can you live in so much denial?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8n6PsRdhV4


ok.they found an altar...where it says that was philistines altar?

listen to the guy when he explains it to you he talks about it for 3 minutes... Shocked

maybe this one will help you.. its clearer.. and more detailed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaf7BDlY1cE
No archaeological evidence exists that denies various groups of “sea people” were in Canaan long before the arrival of the main body in the early twelfth century B.C. (see Unger, 1954, p. 91; Archer, 1964, p. 266; Harrison, 1963, p. 32). To assume that not a single group of Philistines lived in Palestine during the time of Abraham because archaeology has not documented them until about 1190 B.C. is to argue from negative evidence and is without substantial weight. In response to those who would deny the Philistines’ existence based upon their silence in the archeological world before this time, professor Kitchen stated: “Inscriptionally, we know so little about the Aegean peoples as compared with those of the rest of the Ancient Near East in the second millennium B.C., that it is premature to deny outright the possible existence of Philistines in the Aegean area before 1200 B.C.” (1966, p. 80n). Likely, successive waves of sea peoples from the Aegean Sea migrated to Canaan, even as early as Abraham’s time, and continued coming until the massive movement in the twelfth century B.C. (Archer, 1970, p. 18).
https://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=6&article=671
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 10:42:26 AM
so one conceptual thing i don't totally understand. if israel in some sense stole the lands from the palestinians, didn't the palestinians steal the land from the romans, who stole the land from the greeks, who stole the land from the persians, who stole the land from the babylonians, who stole the land from the assyrians, who stole the land from the jews? i don't understand why the "right" to the land started arbitrarily at one point in time (so the argument seems to me to go).
'palestinians' are a new creation/fabrication.

A weapon to use against Israel.

They are Arabs.

If you look at their surnames, many of them betray their origin. Far from being a 'palestinan' people, one of the most common names in Gaza is "Al-Masri" which means "The Egyptian".
By this logic since Israelis are mostly Russian and Polish and should be summarily sent back to their countries of origin.
Ignorant biased comment
200 Palestinians killed -> Human shields, missiles hidden in their houses
2 Israeli soldiers killed -> War crime
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 10:40:31 AM
European countries do not want the baboons running wild in the streets. They're already suffering with riots in the likes of France - where Muslim riots seem like an annual event.

I think most Israelis believe that a two state solution needs to be tried, but also believe that it won't be the end of the conflict.

The question is, how big a price will Israel have to pay to try this two state solution out - and if it proves to be disastrous with continued attacks on Israel, will they finally be vindicated? or will they (as I suspect) still get the blame in some measure.
.....and 13 Israeli Soldiers have died in an operation in Gaza.

I think if you study the past you will find that Jews and Palestinians have a shared history of 3000 years..
education is the key to social harmony. what hamas and isreal are doing right now is filling their peoples heads with propaganda.

the only thing that can fix that is dialog and education.


sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 10:38:54 AM
European countries do not want the baboons running wild in the streets. They're already suffering with riots in the likes of France - where Muslim riots seem like an annual event.

I think most Israelis believe that a two state solution needs to be tried, but also believe that it won't be the end of the conflict.

The question is, how big a price will Israel have to pay to try this two state solution out - and if it proves to be disastrous with continued attacks on Israel, will they finally be vindicated? or will they (as I suspect) still get the blame in some measure.
.....and 13 Israeli Soldiers have died in an operation in Gaza.
You can thank Israeli conservatives for that. Meanwhile, the IDF is shelling Shajayea and has killed over 60 Palestinians there.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 441
July 23, 2014, 10:38:38 AM
I really cannot comprehend how there is an "anti isreal" argument in this, let alone mass riots in other countries against them defending their citizens.

It pretty much is this is my mind... If you are against Isreal in this conflict, you are an anti-semitic piece of shit human who deserves to die choking on your own feces.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
July 23, 2014, 10:35:02 AM
European countries do not want the baboons running wild in the streets. They're already suffering with riots in the likes of France - where Muslim riots seem like an annual event.

I think most Israelis believe that a two state solution needs to be tried, but also believe that it won't be the end of the conflict.

The question is, how big a price will Israel have to pay to try this two state solution out - and if it proves to be disastrous with continued attacks on Israel, will they finally be vindicated? or will they (as I suspect) still get the blame in some measure.
.....and 13 Israeli Soldiers have died in an operation in Gaza.
Pages:
Jump to: