cpp is short for c plus plus .... jeez
strange an old post of mine was deleted from this forum
i wonder why
Topic: Ixcoin TODO - page 17. (Read 631753 times)
erm no let me correct you, My problem is with the IXC community as a whole. The work i did on the ixcoin client, wasnt paid for, and its unreasonable for anyone to expect me to fix it.
It seems as though people here have selective memory. May i remind you about the ixc client me and groundrod worked on which wasnt adopted by mining pools and also had unrealistic requirements for us to meet.
Ahmed
It seems as though people here have selective memory. May i remind you about the ixc client me and groundrod worked on which wasnt adopted by mining pools and also had unrealistic requirements for us to meet.
Ahmed
I can't believe we're arguing over a 10 minute amount of work. And I thought I was nuts.
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
Am i the only one here who can read. There is no problem, it was just some advice
i have to admit ignorance.
i cant even tell what language it is - i would guess python?
Please don't force us to beg for your help.
All we want is things to run smoothly, i dont think deadsea was trying to provoke you.
but 2BTC is a considerable sum of money for something that we are yet to see up & running.
Sigh, the coinomi deva are saying that there is an error in one of the ixcoin tests which i refuse to help fix because i never got paid for all the work i previously did to it
My delay was out of my hands, the waiting on my side was for coinomi, entirely different.
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
Am i the only one here who can read. There is no problem, it was just some advice
i have to admit ignorance.
i cant even tell what language it is - i would guess python?
Please don't force us to beg for your help.
All we want is things to run smoothly, i dont think deadsea was trying to provoke you.
but 2BTC is a considerable sum of money for something that we are yet to see up & running.
i refuse to work for such a venomous community.
Ahmed
Ahmed
Trust: -4: -2 / +0
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
~CfA~
Ok, Ahmed, we'll take care of it. Thanks for your hard work.
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
Am i the only one here who can read. There is no problem, it was just some advice
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
Am i the only one here who can read. There is no problem, it was just some advice
Ahmed, looks like all that's needed is to fix the file adding nodes and removing an error. I would do it but you know my technical skills.
It's a 10 minute job. I'll pay you for the effort but please just get it done.
Thanks!
Are we really that bad in here?
I was under the impression we were a somewhat decent bunch of misfits..
is it really as simple as providing nodes? like these?
v.0.8.6
addnode=162.222.160.77
addnode=5.196.109.69
addnode=64.156.193.100
addnode=82.197.211.136
v.0.9.3
addnode=144.76.71.141
addnode=148.251.90.34
addnode=162.255.117.105
addnode=176.9.65.41
addnode=188.0.42.29
addnode=213.204.248.193
addnode=5.9.20.83
im sure we could do that - but i dont understand;
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
I was under the impression we were a somewhat decent bunch of misfits..
is it really as simple as providing nodes? like these?
v.0.8.6
addnode=162.222.160.77
addnode=5.196.109.69
addnode=64.156.193.100
addnode=82.197.211.136
v.0.9.3
addnode=144.76.71.141
addnode=148.251.90.34
addnode=162.255.117.105
addnode=176.9.65.41
addnode=188.0.42.29
addnode=213.204.248.193
addnode=5.9.20.83
im sure we could do that - but i dont understand;
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Ahmed, how much to finish this properly? It doesn't sound like much is left.
Come on, brother, let's not blow each other up.
Nothing, i refuse to work for such a venomous community. I did my part, All it is is a case of someone providing coinomi with a list of nodes. A simple 1 Minute task.
Ahmed
Ahmed, how much to finish this properly? It doesn't sound like much is left.
Come on, brother, let's not blow each other up.
@Ahmed: Please be as quick as you are at asking money
@Ahmed: received the below email from coinomi
Please Ahmed fix the problems. Thanks
"The ixcoind cannot connect to any other node and hence cannot download the blockchain. Can you please share some IPs we could use?
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
@Ahmed: received the below email from coinomi
Please Ahmed fix the problems. Thanks
"The ixcoind cannot connect to any other node and hence cannot download the blockchain. Can you please share some IPs we could use?
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
1) Thanks for the clever remark
2) Not my problem
3) I did my job, submitted working code to coinomi which was tested
4) I see no reason i should be doing more work, free of charge when people like yourself "deadsea" string me along for weeks until i end up complaining to get money which is rightfully mine.
So overall, The message coinomi sent was clear. They needed some addnodes to sync their ixcoind. Which as i recall was your task since you agreed to organise the hosting of the electrum server with coinomi. So now quit asking me to do your work.
Ahmed
+1000. This is urgent, Ahmed, plesso do what you can. Thx!
@Ahmed: Please be as quick as you are at asking money
@Ahmed: received the below email from coinomi
Please Ahmed fix the problems. Thanks
"The ixcoind cannot connect to any other node and hence cannot download the blockchain. Can you please share some IPs we could use?
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
@Ahmed: received the below email from coinomi
Please Ahmed fix the problems. Thanks
"The ixcoind cannot connect to any other node and hence cannot download the blockchain. Can you please share some IPs we could use?
Also when compiling there is an error with the src/test/DoS_tests.cpp file. You declare the following:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx);
But the only implementation that is close to this is in src/main.cpp:
src/main.cpp:
bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransaction& tx, NodeId peer)
Not a big issue but letting you know"
Thomas did it... He started the alt craze - and I'm glad he did; it give me a chance to join in too in a more substantial fashion than if there was only bitcoin. It definitely has come a loong way since. Nicey and spicy. thanx Thomas.
I too must give props to Thomas. Without him being first to clone Bitcoin, there would be no Nuggets or Shitcoin today. It's hard to imagine the world without them.
))For reals though, Thomas has gotten nothing but trash talk for 5 years. The man earned serious credit so I'm glad he's getting some. Maybe soon they'll be able to add something much more grand and glorious to his card.
Thomas did it... He started the alt craze - and I'm glad he did; it give me a chance to join in too in a more substantial fashion than if there was only bitcoin. It definitely has come a loong way since. Nicey and spicy. thanx Thomas.
Bahahahaaaaaa.
GENIUS! When is the Hollywood lawsuit gonna start? lol
What will happen when IXcoin is removed from CEX.io? that's going to happen in the long run, evidently.
I remember when Nasakioto posted this project in August 2011, the common opinion was that he had created it merely to enrich himself with more BTC.
You guys have been doing an amazing job keeping IX alive over the years. There's only so much you can do, though.
I remember when Nasakioto posted this project in August 2011, the common opinion was that he had created it merely to enrich himself with more BTC.
You guys have been doing an amazing job keeping IX alive over the years. There's only so much you can do, though.
Thomas could have dumped the entire premine and still not have made enough to pay for the server, domain and other costs. IX was never a get rich quick scheme for Thomas or anyone else associated with IX. It's either the real deal or nothing.
Regarding CEX, Long term it's hard to say but short term it's never good to lose such a big partner and 90% of your security. We'll see what happens.
Jump to: