The JP node network stopped responding at 02:52 but the network came back to life a minute later.
All workers on the JP node failed over, but connected straight back and all have now failed back to JP
(it can take cgminer up to 5 minutes to fail back)
All other mining was ok.
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1022. (Read 5352445 times)
March 22, 2017, 10:00:33 PM
March 22, 2017, 04:48:42 PM
i alwasy thought all my miners where broken
but they work, so thats nice March 22, 2017, 04:44:48 PM
i seem to visit the internet to little.. i found 2 blocks it seems.!! i never thought they would find any
For a PPLNS pool where we all get rewarded, like bitcoin works, only when blocks are found ... that's what matters 
Keep at it!
March 22, 2017, 04:39:28 PM
i seem to visit the internet to little.. i found 2 blocks it seems.!! i never thought they would find any
March 22, 2017, 04:37:04 PM
You can get lots of disconnects due to the GFW and latency will be high.
So, since I currently don't have a node in china for people to mine to - the answer is probably no.
That may change soon.
So, since I currently don't have a node in china for people to mine to - the answer is probably no.
That may change soon.
Hopefully it will change soon enough. Until then any recommendations?
March 22, 2017, 04:23:35 PM
You can get lots of disconnects due to the GFW and latency will be high.
So, since I currently don't have a node in china for people to mine to - the answer is probably no.
That may change soon.
So, since I currently don't have a node in china for people to mine to - the answer is probably no.
That may change soon.
Hopefully it will change soon enough. Until then any recommendations?
March 22, 2017, 04:10:24 PM
Hey guys is it a good idea to mine on this pool if my miners are hosted in china?
You can get lots of disconnects due to the GFW and latency will be high.So, since I currently don't have a node in china for people to mine to - the answer is probably no.
That may change soon.
March 22, 2017, 04:07:10 PM
Hey guys is it a good idea to mine on this pool if my miners are hosted in china?
March 22, 2017, 03:04:48 PM
Schweeeeet! Doing the Block dance191!!! Cha cha cha!
Now enough of the 100+% diff blocks, time for a slew of sub-centuries!
Now enough of the 100+% diff blocks, time for a slew of sub-centuries!
March 22, 2017, 02:47:24 PM
Way to go dance!
March 22, 2017, 02:45:06 PM
dance191 with their 27th! Crushing it!
March 22, 2017, 02:44:05 PM
Block by dance191! And 1.75BTC in fees!
March 22, 2017, 01:20:09 PM
Blocks, Blocks now ..
March 22, 2017, 11:24:20 AM
Come on block already!
March 21, 2017, 06:14:37 PM
FYI I didn't watch the link, my reply was just what I know about asic-boost and S9s
March 21, 2017, 12:12:23 PM
...not going to discuss something not directly relevant to the kano's pool here (there are plenty of threads in Speculation).
As far as the "hatred" part, I was referring to his repeated statement the we miners are "milking the community" due to taking fees. 
March 21, 2017, 11:54:37 AM
...youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
...
That should be re-titled "How to NOT Answer a Direct Question While Pushing Your Personal Hatred for Bitmain and Miners"...
I got the answer to my question from kano, not going to discuss something not directly relevant to the kano's pool here (there are plenty of threads in Speculation).
March 21, 2017, 11:35:24 AM
...youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
...
That should be re-titled "How to NOT Answer a Direct Question While Pushing Your Personal Hatred for Bitmain and Miners" ...
March 21, 2017, 10:57:20 AM
A side note, but relevant to S9, perhaps.
Trace Mayer implies that Bitmain uses asic-boost in their miners and asic-boost might be affected by segwit, hence Bitmain's opposition to Segwit.
https://youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
My question is: is it possible that asic-boost gone bad is responsible for some unusual stats for S9v1 on kano's?
Yes I've comment about the asic boost before.Trace Mayer implies that Bitmain uses asic-boost in their miners and asic-boost might be affected by segwit, hence Bitmain's opposition to Segwit.
https://youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
My question is: is it possible that asic-boost gone bad is responsible for some unusual stats for S9v1 on kano's?
I posted in the S9 thread Bitmain documents showing they had it in their S9s
Bitmain's code for that was what caused the initial S9s to not work on ckpool since they changed the stratum authentication to something that didn't work with the ckpool stratum implementation.
You can tell it hasn't made any blocks due to the fact that the blocks created by asic boost would have a different block version number - which is the main complaint about it.
... and yes I implied that it was possible that was a cause of the terrible S9v1 block luck.
By the way the CDF[Erl] for S9v1 is still above 0.99 (and going up again)
March 21, 2017, 10:33:11 AM
A side note, but relevant to S9, perhaps.
Trace Mayer implies that Bitmain uses asic-boost in their miners and asic-boost might be affected by segwit, hence Bitmain's opposition to Segwit.
https://youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
My question is: is it possible that asic-boost gone bad is responsible for some unusual stats for S9v1 on kano's?
Trace Mayer implies that Bitmain uses asic-boost in their miners and asic-boost might be affected by segwit, hence Bitmain's opposition to Segwit.
https://youtu.be/PuW66xlUW9A?t=1764
My question is: is it possible that asic-boost gone bad is responsible for some unusual stats for S9v1 on kano's?
Jump to: