Hey Kano,
Had some pretty funky networking issues going on the last few days. I think I have it all sorted out and I am bringing more hardware online, but the tubes stopped showing up in the workers section. My stats page says its getting and doing good work, and I can point it at slush and see it working so I know its not the controller. Any chance you can take a look on your end?
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1907. (Read 5352119 times)
December 31, 2015, 03:17:46 AM
December 31, 2015, 02:56:03 AM
CKDB restart complete. (I took 11 minutes in total)
December 31, 2015, 02:32:55 AM
Firstly, I'm gonna run a ckdb restart in about 10 minutes.
Anyone who has an app that can't handle that ... expect a false block alarm
I wont affect mining at all.
It's a major (but small code) change in how I store all the data in ram.
Tested well, but if there's any problems on the pool, I'll restart and roll it back to the previous version.
That's not expected, but just a warning in case I end up doing 2 restarts.
I expect only one, but letting you know just in case
--
That's the first block with the latest payout address: 1CVVn6sC46aZdokEnU1LThmi8WsMV4qzgh
I've added that to the top of the Payments page.
--
In about 15 blocks, diff is gonna go up again and it looks like it will be roughly 103G
So that block would still make it in!
The last 10 blocks:
8 out of 10 would still be good enough at the new diff
Anyone who has an app that can't handle that ... expect a false block alarm
I wont affect mining at all.
It's a major (but small code) change in how I store all the data in ram.
Tested well, but if there's any problems on the pool, I'll restart and roll it back to the previous version.
That's not expected, but just a warning in case I end up doing 2 restarts.
I expect only one, but letting you know just in case
--
HOLY BLOCK. Been here since mid June and finally got a block for the pool!!!!! 
407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
... and a good diff also 203% 407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
Code:
[2015-12-31 17:29:01.669+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 203.2% (189919365353/93448670796.3) dsppage.SS7H Pool 162559431115.0 163G 173.96%
That's the first block with the latest payout address: 1CVVn6sC46aZdokEnU1LThmi8WsMV4qzgh
I've added that to the top of the Payments page.
--
In about 15 blocks, diff is gonna go up again and it looks like it will be roughly 103G
So that block would still make it in!
The last 10 blocks:
Code:
[2015-12-23 15:28:39.329+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 190.0% (177556684696/93448670796.3) aluz
[2015-12-24 13:59:34.014+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 101.5% (94821318105/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-26 02:01:12.323+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 113.4% (105933542144/93448670796.3) nhminer
[2015-12-27 16:52:16.457+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 154.8% (144704064282/93448670796.3) aluz
[2015-12-27 18:42:28.186+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 145.0% (135490450248/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-29 00:32:25.091+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 3238.8% (3026600715050/93448670796.3) bitminerpro
[2015-12-29 12:33:09.217+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 2723.2% (2544831115593/93448670796.3) hashratech
[2015-12-29 22:39:12.243+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 11371.7% (10626708763838/93448670796.3) canaan
[2015-12-30 05:34:21.873+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 108.0% (100888000845/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-31 17:29:01.669+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 203.2% (189919365353/93448670796.3) dsppage
[2015-12-24 13:59:34.014+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 101.5% (94821318105/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-26 02:01:12.323+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 113.4% (105933542144/93448670796.3) nhminer
[2015-12-27 16:52:16.457+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 154.8% (144704064282/93448670796.3) aluz
[2015-12-27 18:42:28.186+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 145.0% (135490450248/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-29 00:32:25.091+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 3238.8% (3026600715050/93448670796.3) bitminerpro
[2015-12-29 12:33:09.217+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 2723.2% (2544831115593/93448670796.3) hashratech
[2015-12-29 22:39:12.243+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 11371.7% (10626708763838/93448670796.3) canaan
[2015-12-30 05:34:21.873+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 108.0% (100888000845/93448670796.3) hjry
[2015-12-31 17:29:01.669+11] BLOCK! ok Diff 203.2% (189919365353/93448670796.3) dsppage
8 out of 10 would still be good enough at the new diff
December 31, 2015, 01:52:22 AM
DOING THE BLOCK DANCE!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!!!! My Spider Senses are STRONG!
December 31, 2015, 01:51:30 AM
December 31, 2015, 01:51:17 AM
HOLY BLOCK. Been here since mid June and finally got a block for the pool!!!!!
407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
finally... jk, no complaints. good job knocking that one out [ two years earlier than stats for that speed
]. 
December 31, 2015, 01:38:19 AM
HOLY BLOCK. Been here since mid June and finally got a block for the pool!!!!!
407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
407 391079 dsppage.SS7H 25.05412314 2015-12-31 06:29:01+00 +1 Confirms ~162,559,976,043 ~173.956% 0.824 1
Elapsed GH/S(5s) GH/S(avg) FoundBlocks LocalWork Utility WU BestShare
34m22s 5,289.61 5,228.26 1 4,197,996 18.51 73,072.54 189919365353
Funny that I just rebooted that miner 34 min ago
December 31, 2015, 12:41:05 AM
Batch 6 of Antminer S7 is the best to overclock, many of them do about 5,2 Th/s right out of the box.
December 31, 2015, 12:24:32 AM
I'm happy with overclocking mine to 750MHz / 6Th/s.
6TH/s?? Do you mean 5TH/s, or do you know something I don't?
4.7 * 750 / 700 = ~5
Some of the earlier gens come at lower clocks, like 600hz, they have more chips so they can be overclocked to a much higher Hashrate. Not that this relevant to Kano CKPool.
Yep, I'm talking about the uncrippled S7s with 162 chips. 6TH/s is not a typo.
Which batch are you getting the 6th from? 1,3,5? Also what PSU are you using to get that? I have some 1,2,3,5,7 & 8, some with Bitmain PSU and some EVGA 1600
December 30, 2015, 11:54:14 PM
I'm happy with overclocking mine to 750MHz / 6Th/s.
6TH/s?? Do you mean 5TH/s, or do you know something I don't?
4.7 * 750 / 700 = ~5
Some of the earlier gens come at lower clocks, like 600hz, they have more chips so they can be overclocked to a much higher Hashrate. Not that this relevant to Kano CKPool.
Yep, I'm talking about the uncrippled S7s with 162 chips. 6TH/s is not a typo.
December 30, 2015, 11:50:33 PM
If I'm only going to hash small, I'm going to hash with a pool of small(ish) miners like this pool. Good luck to us all - and nice to see some familiar names on the hashlist - I know I'm in pretty good company around here. Thanks for running this Kano.
OH - and I will have to apologize in advance. Every pool I join suffers the worst luck ever.
Then. Let's ban him.
+1...Now...GET OUT!!
jk December 30, 2015, 11:31:41 PM
I smell a BLOCK COMING!!!
See if the chicken Alfredo (?) does the trick! LOL
December 30, 2015, 11:14:12 PM
Got some "invalid" on some older miner i added to the pool today.
Took a small screengrab of it :
https://i.imgur.com/dErIGTP.jpg
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Took a small screengrab of it :
https://i.imgur.com/dErIGTP.jpg
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Rejects happen. My invalid % (0.5%) is pretty close to my rejected (0.45%) you can see on the miner side. Such a low amount seem pretty normal to me. It should be mostly shares submitted that become invalid/stale because they were submitted/received too late.
Ah ok thnx, i will watch the miners next time im in the serverroom.
The Block :
December 30, 2015, 11:00:16 PM
I smell a BLOCK COMING!!!
Damn I hope so, if I eat any more chicken I'm going to sprout feathers and start clucking! Not that it would be a bad thing if we pop a block... December 30, 2015, 10:52:37 PM
I smell a BLOCK COMING!!!
December 30, 2015, 10:42:35 PM
I'm happy with overclocking mine to 750MHz / 6Th/s.
6TH/s?? Do you mean 5TH/s, or do you know something I don't?
4.7 * 750 / 700 = ~5
Some of the earlier gens come at lower clocks, like 600hz, they have more chips so they can be overclocked to a much higher Hashrate. Not that this relevant to Kano CKPool.
December 30, 2015, 10:37:20 PM
I'm happy with overclocking mine to 750MHz / 6Th/s.
6TH/s?? Do you mean 5TH/s, or do you know something I don't?
4.7 * 750 / 700 = ~5
December 30, 2015, 10:01:55 PM
If I'm only going to hash small, I'm going to hash with a pool of small(ish) miners like this pool. Good luck to us all - and nice to see some familiar names on the hashlist - I know I'm in pretty good company around here. Thanks for running this Kano.
OH - and I will have to apologize in advance. Every pool I join suffers the worst luck ever.
Then. Let's ban him.
December 30, 2015, 10:01:28 PM
Got some "invalid" on some older miner i added to the pool today.
Took a small screengrab of it :
https://i.imgur.com/dErIGTP.jpg
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Took a small screengrab of it :
https://i.imgur.com/dErIGTP.jpg
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Rejects happen. My invalid % (0.5%) is pretty close to my rejected (0.45%) you can see on the miner side. Such a low amount seem pretty normal to me. It should be mostly shares submitted that become invalid/stale because they were submitted/received too late.
December 30, 2015, 09:57:02 PM
Got some "invalid" on some older miner i added to the pool today.
Took a small screengrab of it :
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Took a small screengrab of it :
The S7 is on 0,1% , but both old KNC have more invalid, one of the antique avalon also has quite a lot invalids, 0,816%
What are thoose invalids ?
What are normal ?
Is it possible for a miner to send back garbage data with somewhat correct checksums so that a pool doesnt find the block becouse of junk data that gets into the system ?
Jump to: