Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 200. (Read 5352229 times)

Got that one out of the way finally.   Let's get this next one.


MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

Blblblblblblblblblllllllooooocccckkkk by CryptoStarrrrrrrrrr!!!

Apparently should be back online and working within the next day.

Engineer here,so well trained to not believe anything unless its in my house and powered on and working as stated,but it sounds pretty interesting,japos always were tech savy  
Time will tell
BLOCK! BTCBTCBTC
MINE ON!

Barely a blip on the variance these days...

But we seem to have lost a bit from sidewinder - hopefully any troubles get sorted out soon

BTCamm!!! The extra HashPower should help plow through them quickly. 

The 200% blocks go by pretty quickly these days

Block! by cryptostarusa

What kano said....Moore's law is catching up to ASIC's right now...just like it did with CPU chips (INTC, AMD)...

I'm not exactly sure how anyone would believe marketing hype where a company says they can do something a LOT harder than what Intel, nVidia and AMD have yet to achieve with just CPUs and GPUs

I see no 10nm CPUs or GPUs in the near future, and Bitcoin mining is a lot more power intensive and thus a lot more difficult to manufacture workable chips.

Yet they're boasting jumping straight to 7nm ... ... ...

There's also google-able reasons (related to power issues) why there are no 10nm CPUs and GPUs yet

News update from our Japanese friends over in Tokyo :

GMO Miner B2 is launching on sale apparently at the end~ish of October this year,
Their new miner seems to boast a 7nm process ,more info to be added at a press conference on 6/6/2018 at a hotel over there,(consumption,hashrate,etcetera).
Designed and manufactured in Japan,that alone could tip the scales on the Chinese,cause those Shitmains are really really bad at quality,hopefully there`s some juice behind those statements.

On their site,some information can be found regarding some performance stats on their server blades that they mine with,apparently they want to also release a GPU-slot mining card that`s around 8TH with 300~ish W consumption 
If these figures turn out true,we might see 16nm processes go completely absolete ,cause these new performance stats look so so damn hot!!!
Gotta say ,that sounds pretty bloody interesting!

If we`ll get some shipped globally,fingers crossed,this might start the new hardware 7nm-Gen Rush (2019 early maybe ?)
MINE ON!

Now that I rebuilt the blocks (be aware that I have not fixed the bug for new blocks yet), here are the final totals for April (which matches what ZorzyZii stated for Slush's April count).

Kano - 22 blocks, average 134.35Th/s, 0.0280175 payout for 13.5Th/s
Slush - 496 blocks, average 3.12Ph/s, 0.0273638 payout for 13.5Th/s

My personal payout for roughly 13.58 Th/s from Kano was 0.0278895, so these numbers are close (there are all kinds of rounding differences since pool reporting is done in Th/s, etc).

Here are the CDT values (Coins per Day per Th/s) that also show Kano over Slush short and long term.
Name   Week CDT      Month CDT      Quarter CDT   Year CDT
KanoPool   0.00010197   0.00006459   0.00008834   0.00021177
SlushPool   0.00005526   0.00005896   0.00006884   0.00020906

For April our month luck was 100.37% - so we pretty much hit right on target.

Firstly:
You can NEVER expect any pool to get better than 100% luck.
You must always assume 100% luck minus fees.
So if a pool hits 100% luck then someone can not claim any magical crystal ball future predictions saying they'll get more at another pool with higher fees

We do keep up the luck around 100% long term, and do keep hitting blocks every diff change, so fees really are the only metric that will allow you to compare 'expected' reward between us and another pool.

No idea about the data, but I can point out that the only way mining on slush could have made 11% more than us last month is if their month luck was:
Luck here was 100.37% * 101.1% (extra fees) * 111%
So they'd have to have had 112.64% luck for the month of April.

Now if they got 500 blocks in that month, then the CDF[Erl] of them getting 112.64% luck is ... 0.996835 or once in about 26.3 years
Sounds unlikely they had a 500 block month at 112.6% luck

--

This also indirectly explains variance for anyone who's interested
The more blocks a pool finds, the less likely they are going to have large swings in luck - the CDF[Erl] calculation effectively proves that since the number of events (blocks) reduces the calculated chance of a large swing in the mean (the luck)

We've been pretty high on the variance in the past, so we got high and low months like 143% luck and 44% luck
Since we've grown well above the size in February - more expected blocks per month - we'll find those high swings in variance less likely.

Thank you for looking into this but please don't put too much stock in this report yet.  As I mentioned, I believe I still have some funky business going on with the blocks.  The pool stats such as shares, users, etc are being gathered each minute (for slush and kano) while the block is being processed.  Once the block is found, the "in process" block is supposed to be replaced with the block number found by the pool. For some reason with my coding for Slush, there were a lot of these "in process" blocks that got updated to the found block plus 1.  When the public block gathering code came along, the found block number was not in the system so it added another record for that block.  As I said, I will look into this more next week since I have several issues for my digital signage paying customer base that I have to take care of this week.

*Edit - if you want to actually count the blocks, you can find them at https://slushpool.com/stats/blocks/.  I just purged the entire block table for slush and am reprocessing them again.

Kano and the rest of us look at this,
They lie to show better results. THEY LIE. Look at it here, https://btc.com/stats/pool/SlushPool it says that in April Slush pool found 496 blocks, and on this link  https://www.minergain.com/?btcstats&poolid=-1&hash=13.5&groupby=30 is written 553. 57 blocks more.
How is it no shame for them that they have to lie to show better results?
They started to lie because they fear KanoPool will be better and better. You'll see, It will.
In my previous calculation I have shown that the Kano Pool with 150PHs has approximately the same earnings as Slush, and now that we have 50PHs, we will have more profit from the Slush Pool on one S9.
Kano, please comment this. Why do they lie about the data?

You cannot recover 2FA from the website.

You can manually enter the 2FA into a 2nd device, the only thing required is the Secret Key - but if you saved the actual QRCode then you just need to scan that again into another device.

If you need to manually enter the code, the relevant settings are: TOTP, 6 digits, SHA256, 30 seconds

Well let's just MINE THE F ON THEN! 

Heh - it dropped an hour ago due to a power issue for some miners.
It'll be back.

It might be something else going on, Kano seemed pretty confident it was settled at ~190ish.

And the hash rate becomes more "normal" again after the chasers have left.  They totally missed out last weekend.   


MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!