And new block confirmed:
https://blockchain.info/block-index/497180/00000000000000000ed46b33dda9ebee4d9a46dcd877349441a90f8ad70f03cf
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2230. (Read 5350247 times)
November 14, 2014, 01:29:14 AM
November 14, 2014, 01:21:51 AM
yeah... another block found 329931
nice...
nice...
November 13, 2014, 08:53:24 PM
FYI I am running 3 tubes no problem. Just pointed them to a windows server running bfgminer in proxy pointed here. Works great has been up 5 days 18 hours so far no problems.
November 13, 2014, 08:37:54 PM
question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .
If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
Long term plan, but not any time soon.
Ugh! I guess all my hopes reside in Sidehack to figure a way to proxy them to you.
November 13, 2014, 08:27:00 PM
question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .
If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
Long term plan, but not any time soon.
November 13, 2014, 08:16:10 PM
blocks blocks blocks and more to come. coins are still up around 415usd. I think I will have a nice holiday season.
question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .
question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .
November 13, 2014, 08:02:16 PM
Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?
Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.
The listing of 594M diff means 594 million diff1 share equivalents, it doesn't mean the share itself was only 594M or it wouldn't have solved the block as you correctly said.Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.
Great. Thanks for the quick reply. I understand now. The 594M was just how many diff1 equivalent shares had been submitted when it was solved.
November 13, 2014, 07:50:17 PM
And another block for good measure 
I was developing on a rig at the time I spotted this:
Pool console output was still up showing this:
https://blockchain.info/tx/50a545448349cf7b6982593185f1657d599a7f9d38e1887e311b4b19fd2a5f6c
EDIT: Confirmed
I was developing on a rig at the time I spotted this:
Code:
[2014-11-13 16:45:58] Pool 0 message: Block 329896 solved by ckpool!
[2014-11-13 16:45:59] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
Pool console output was still up showing this:
Code:
[2014-11-14 10:46:01] Possible block solve diff 48144757906.104950 !
[2014-11-14 10:46:01] Submitting block data!
[2014-11-14 10:46:02] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2014-11-14 10:46:02] Solved and confirmed block 329896
https://blockchain.info/tx/50a545448349cf7b6982593185f1657d599a7f9d38e1887e311b4b19fd2a5f6c
EDIT: Confirmed
November 13, 2014, 07:44:37 PM
Would it be better to run it in passthru proxy or standalone? I've used it as standalone for some other pools before. It worked pretty well. Way easier than having 40 smaller miners opening their own connections.
Passthrough is really only designed for the server end as it is simply designed to collate connections into one. Clients (users) should be using the proxy mode themselves if they wish to consolidate their connections to the pool so as to set up only one pool for all of their devices. November 13, 2014, 07:41:35 PM
Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?
Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.
The listing of 594M diff means 594 million diff1 share equivalents, it doesn't mean the share itself was only 594M or it wouldn't have solved the block as you correctly said. Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.
November 13, 2014, 07:38:52 PM
Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?
Luck 😉 Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?
Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.
November 13, 2014, 04:42:54 PM
Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?
Luck 😉 November 13, 2014, 01:42:49 PM
Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?
November 13, 2014, 10:12:22 AM
Added CDF in case anyone wants it and understands it 
Calculation courtesy of organofcorti - thanks!
Calculation courtesy of organofcorti - thanks!
November 13, 2014, 05:12:01 AM
Its really convenient to be able to check confirmations without logging in too.
November 13, 2014, 03:37:38 AM
Just added a public Pool->Blocks menu so non-members can see the awesomeness of our past luck on the web site without having to login 
November 13, 2014, 01:05:33 AM
Hi Kano,
Just wanted to let you know something about "REGISTERING."
The first time I registered under the user name "Proud Clown" [with a space], my rigs never did want to connect to your pool with Proud Clown_worker1 in my S3's.
When I went back in and created another account with the user name "ProudClown" [no space], my rigs connected just fine with ProudClown_worker1 in my S3's.
When registering, it never told me I could not use a space. I was quite happy at first because it appeared that I could WHEN REGISTERING. However, when I entered my worker name with a space in my worker box in "miner configuration" it would not connect. It was dead every time.
So, when you have the time [which I know that is limited at the moment] you might want to look into making it where people cannot register with a user name with a space in it.
Proud Clown
I'd guess you missed putting quotes around it like "Proud Clown_worker1" for cgminer?Just wanted to let you know something about "REGISTERING."
The first time I registered under the user name "Proud Clown" [with a space], my rigs never did want to connect to your pool with Proud Clown_worker1 in my S3's.
When I went back in and created another account with the user name "ProudClown" [no space], my rigs connected just fine with ProudClown_worker1 in my S3's.
When registering, it never told me I could not use a space. I was quite happy at first because it appeared that I could WHEN REGISTERING. However, when I entered my worker name with a space in my worker box in "miner configuration" it would not connect. It was dead every time.
So, when you have the time [which I know that is limited at the moment] you might want to look into making it where people cannot register with a user name with a space in it.
Proud Clown
I've registered a username on my home test pool with a space and it works ok for me - so that's probably the reason.
Yeah the home pool is the same thing - it's where I test changes also before they go live - so far I'm 1.85% of a block on my home pool since I started writing ckdb
Though that keeps going down ... since I don't mine much there ... diff rises make it go down each time - I think it was above 2% once.
November 12, 2014, 08:22:11 PM
This is tempting!
November 12, 2014, 08:12:40 PM
Another block
74% diff
https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205
74% diff
https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205
dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......
having an issue with a new long tube that came in today. I have it running at www.mmpool.org but can't get it to run here. using minera will post a screen shot after supper.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
no worries then I will move some other miners around to you.
November 12, 2014, 07:40:46 PM
Another block
74% diff
https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205
74% diff
https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205
dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......
having an issue with a new long tube that came in today. I have it running at www.mmpool.org but can't get it to run here. using minera will post a screen shot after supper.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.
ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.
Jump to: